Developmental Biology and Cancer Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK; Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;4(2):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30342-6. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
Marked variation exists in the use of genomic data in tumour diagnosis, and optimal integration with conventional diagnostic technology remains uncertain despite several studies reporting improved diagnostic accuracy, selection for targeted treatments, and stratification for trials. Our aim was to assess the added value of molecular profiling in routine clinical practice and the impact on conventional and experimental treatments.
This population-based study assessed the diagnostic and clinical use of DNA methylation-based profiling in childhood CNS tumours using two large national cohorts in the UK. In the diagnostic cohort-which included routinely diagnosed CNS tumours between Sept 1, 2016, and Sept 1, 2018-we assessed how the methylation profile altered or refined diagnosis in routine clinical practice and estimated how this would affect standard patient management. For the archival cohort of diagnostically difficult cases, we established how many cases could be solved using modern standard pathology, how many could only be solved using the methylation profile, and how many remained unsolvable.
Of 484 patients younger than 20 years with CNS tumours, 306 had DNA methylation arrays requested by the neuropathologist and were included in the diagnostic cohort. Molecular profiling added a unique contribution to clinical diagnosis in 107 (35%; 95% CI 30-40) of 306 cases in routine diagnostic practice-providing additional molecular subtyping data in 99 cases, amended the final diagnosis in five cases, and making potentially significant predictions in three cases. We estimated that it could change conventional management in 11 (4%; 95% CI 2-6) of 306 patients. Among 195 historically difficult-to-diagnose tumours in the archival cohort, 99 (51%) could be diagnosed using standard methods, with the addition of methylation profiling solving a further 34 (17%) cases. The remaining 62 (32%) cases were unresolved despite specialist pathology and methylation profiling.
Together, these data provide estimates of the impact that could be expected from routine implementation of genomic profiling into clinical practice, and indicate limitations where additional techniques will be required. We conclude that DNA methylation arrays are a useful diagnostic adjunct for childhood CNS tumours.
The Brain Tumour Charity, Children with Cancer UK, Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity, Olivia Hodson Cancer Fund, Cancer Research UK, and the National Institute of Health Research.
在肿瘤诊断中,基因组数据的使用存在显著差异,尽管有几项研究报告称其可提高诊断准确性、选择靶向治疗以及临床试验分层,但与常规诊断技术的最佳整合仍不确定。我们的目的是评估分子谱分析在常规临床实践中的附加价值及其对常规和实验治疗的影响。
本基于人群的研究使用英国的两个大型队列评估了 DNA 甲基化谱分析在儿童中枢神经系统肿瘤中的诊断和临床应用。在诊断队列中-包括 2016 年 9 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 1 日期间常规诊断的中枢神经系统肿瘤-我们评估了甲基化谱如何改变或完善常规临床实践中的诊断,并估计这将如何影响标准的患者管理。对于诊断困难的存档队列,我们确定了使用现代标准病理学可以解决多少病例,仅使用甲基化谱可以解决多少病例,以及仍有多少病例无法解决。
在 484 名年龄小于 20 岁的患有中枢神经系统肿瘤的患者中,有 306 名患者的神经病理学家要求进行 DNA 甲基化分析,并被纳入诊断队列。在常规诊断实践中,分子谱分析在 107 例(35%;95%CI 30-40)中为临床诊断提供了独特的贡献-在 99 例中提供了额外的分子亚型数据,在 5 例中修改了最终诊断,并在 3 例中做出了潜在的重要预测。我们估计,它可能会改变 306 名患者中的 11 名(4%;95%CI 2-6)的常规治疗方法。在存档队列中 195 例历史上难以诊断的肿瘤中,有 99 例(51%)可以使用标准方法诊断,添加甲基化谱分析后,又解决了 34 例(17%)。尽管进行了专科病理学和甲基化谱分析,但仍有 62 例(32%)病例无法解决。
这些数据共同提供了对将基因组谱分析常规应用于临床实践可能产生的影响的估计,并表明在需要额外技术的地方存在局限性。我们的结论是,DNA 甲基化分析是儿童中枢神经系统肿瘤的有用诊断辅助手段。
脑肿瘤慈善机构、英国儿童癌症协会、大奥蒙德街儿童医院慈善机构、奥利维亚·霍德森癌症基金、癌症研究英国、国家卫生研究院。