Suppr超能文献

行人与车辆碰撞事故:儿童、青少年和成年人的风险认知与责任归因

Pedestrian-vehicle crashes: Risk perception and responsibility attribution among children, adolescents and adults.

作者信息

Yu Sophie, Wu Yue, Mrug Sylvie, Wang Huarong, Ridley Scarlett, Hu Guoqing, Schwebel David C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Campbell Hall 415, 1530 3rd Avenue South. Birmingham, AL 35294-1170. Email:

出版信息

J Inj Violence Res. 2020 Jan;12(1):29-38. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v12i1.1243. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Child pedestrian injuries in China result from crashes not just with cars. We considered how Chinese youth and young adults perceive pedestrian risk from four vehicle types-bicycles, electric bicycles, cars, buses-evaluating perceptions for two factors that may influence pedestrian behavior and risk-taking, perception of road environment risk and responsibility to avoid crashes. Understanding how pedestrians perceive risk, and how these perceptions change as children grow older, could guide prevention efforts.

METHODS

383 children (grades 3-4, 5-6, 8) and university students completed self-report surveys. We analyzed overall responses, plus age/gender differences in risk perception and responsibility attribution, across vehicle types and number of vehicles approaching, using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models.

RESULTS

Overall, larger vehicles were perceived as riskier (p less than .001). Compared to children, university students perceived bicycles and electric bicycles as less risky (Mean=2.66 vs. 3.69, 3.34 vs. 3.62, respectively, p less than .05). Cars and buses were perceived as equally risky across age groups. Across all vehicle types and number of vehicles traversing the road, both children and young adults perceived more pedestrian responsibility to avoid collisions relative to drivers (p less than .001). Children attributed less personal responsibility to avoid pedestrian-vehicle crashes than university students (e.g., buses odds ratio (OR)=0.20, p less than .001; OR=0.26, p less than .01; OR=0.28, p less than .01 for third/fourth, fifth/sixth, eighth graders, respectively). University students and fifth/sixth graders also identified greater pedestrian responsibility to avoid collisions with multiple vs. one vehicle approaching (e.g., university students/cars OR=4.17, p less than .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss cognitive and perceptual development factors in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood that may contribute to differences in risk perception and responsibility attribution among Chinese pedestrians and suggest future research should explore those processes and subsequently develop evidence-based interventions to reduce pedestrian injury risk.

摘要

背景

在中国,儿童行人受伤不仅是由与汽车相撞导致的。我们研究了中国青少年和青年如何看待来自四种车辆类型(自行车、电动自行车、汽车、公交车)的行人风险,评估了可能影响行人行为和冒险行为的两个因素,即对道路环境风险的认知以及避免碰撞的责任。了解行人如何感知风险,以及随着儿童年龄增长这些认知如何变化,可为预防工作提供指导。

方法

383名儿童(三年级至四年级、五年级至六年级、八年级)和大学生完成了自我报告调查。我们使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)和广义估计方程(GEE)模型,分析了总体反应,以及不同车辆类型和接近车辆数量下风险认知和责任归因的年龄/性别差异。

结果

总体而言,较大型车辆被认为风险更高(p小于0.001)。与儿童相比,大学生认为自行车和电动自行车的风险较低(平均值分别为2.66对3.69、3.34对3.62,p小于0.05)。各年龄组对汽车和公交车的风险认知相同。在所有车辆类型和穿越道路的车辆数量方面,儿童和青年都认为行人相对于司机有更多避免碰撞的责任(p小于0.001)。儿童比大学生更少将个人责任归咎于避免行人与车辆碰撞(例如,公交车的优势比(OR)=0.20,p小于0.001;OR=0.26,p小于0.01;OR=0.28,p小于0.01,分别对应三/四年级、五/六年级、八年级学生)。大学生和五/六年级学生还认为,行人在避免与多辆车辆接近而非一辆车辆接近时负有更大的避免碰撞责任(例如,大学生/汽车的OR=4.17,p小于0.001)。

结论

我们讨论了儿童期、青少年期和青年期可能导致中国行人风险认知和责任归因差异的认知和感知发展因素,并建议未来的研究应探索这些过程,随后制定基于证据的干预措施以降低行人受伤风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验