• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非开普敦儿童行人安全知识、行为与道路伤害情况

Child pedestrian safety knowledge, behaviour and road injury in Cape Town, South Africa.

作者信息

Koekemoer Karin, Van Gesselleen Megan, Van Niekerk Ashley, Govender Rajen, Van As Arjan Bastiaan

机构信息

South African Medical Research Council-University of South Africa Violence, Injury and Peace Research Unit, PO Box 19070, Tygerberg, 7505, Cape Town, South Africa; Institute for Social and Health Sciences, University of South Africa, PO Box 1087, Lenasia, 1820, South Africa.

South African Medical Research Council-University of South Africa Violence, Injury and Peace Research Unit, PO Box 19070, Tygerberg, 7505, Cape Town, South Africa; Institute for Social and Health Sciences, University of South Africa, PO Box 1087, Lenasia, 1820, South Africa.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.020
PMID:27960100
Abstract

Pedestrian injuries are a leading cause of death among South African children, and young children residing in low-income communities are more at risk, due to various factors such as inadequate road infrastructure, exposure to traffic due to reliance on walking as a means of transport, and lack of supervision. This study used a cross-sectional, non-randomized self-report survey to assess pedestrian safety knowledge, road-crossing behaviour and pedestrian injuries of primary school children in selected low-income settings in Cape Town. The survey focused on three primary schools that had joined the Safe Kids Worldwide Model School Zone Project and was administered to 536 children aged 6-15 years, in their home language of isiXhosa. Descriptive and bivariate analyses as well as multivariate regression analyses were conducted to investigate potential predictor variables for pedestrian collision severity and unsafe road-crossing behaviour. Walking was the sole form of travel for 81% of the children, with a large proportion regularly walking unsupervised. Children who walk to or from school alone were younger and reported riskier road-crossing behaviour, although children who walk accompanied tended to have higher pedestrian collision severity. "Negligent Behaviour" related to road-crossing was significantly associated with higher pedestrian collision severity, with predictors of "Negligent Behaviour" including the lack of pedestrian safety knowledge and greater exposure to traffic in terms of time spent walking. More than half of the reported pedestrian collisions involved a bicycle, and older boys (10-15 years) were most at risk of experiencing a severe pedestrian injury. The findings substantiate emerging evidence that children in low-income settings are at greater risk for child pedestrian injury, and emphasise the need for evidence-based safety promotion and injury prevention interventions in these settings.

摘要

行人受伤是南非儿童死亡的主要原因之一,居住在低收入社区的幼儿面临的风险更高,这是由多种因素造成的,比如道路基础设施不足、因依赖步行作为出行方式而暴露于交通环境中,以及缺乏监管。本研究采用横断面、非随机自我报告调查,以评估开普敦选定低收入地区小学生的行人安全知识、过马路行为及行人受伤情况。该调查聚焦于三所加入了“全球安全儿童示范校区项目”的小学,以孩子们的母语科萨语对536名6至15岁的儿童进行了调查。进行了描述性和双变量分析以及多变量回归分析,以调查行人碰撞严重程度和不安全过马路行为的潜在预测变量。81%的儿童唯一的出行方式是步行,很大一部分儿童经常在无人监管的情况下步行。独自步行上下学的儿童年龄更小,报告的过马路行为风险更高,不过有陪同步行的儿童行人碰撞严重程度往往更高。与过马路相关的“疏忽行为”与更高的行人碰撞严重程度显著相关,“疏忽行为”的预测因素包括缺乏行人安全知识以及步行时间方面更多地暴露于交通环境中。报告的行人碰撞事件中,超过一半涉及自行车,年龄较大的男孩(10至15岁)遭受严重行人伤害的风险最高。研究结果证实了新出现的证据,即低收入环境中的儿童遭受儿童行人伤害的风险更大,并强调在这些环境中需要开展基于证据的安全促进和伤害预防干预措施。

相似文献

1
Child pedestrian safety knowledge, behaviour and road injury in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦儿童行人安全知识、行为与道路伤害情况
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
2
Parental supervision and discomfort with children walking to school in low-income communities in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦低收入社区中父母对孩子步行上学的监督及担忧
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 May 19;19(4):391-398. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1420904. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Child pedestrian crossing behaviour and associated risk factors in school zones: a video-based observational study in Kampala, Uganda.儿童在学校区域的过街行为及其相关风险因素:乌干达坎帕拉的基于视频的观察性研究。
Inj Prev. 2024 May 20;30(3):216-223. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044932.
4
The association of road safety knowledge and risk behaviour with paediatric road traffic injury in Guangzhou, China.中国广州道路安全知识、风险行为与儿童道路交通伤害的相关性研究。
Inj Prev. 2011 Feb;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.027540. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
5
Motor vehicle-pedestrian collisions and walking to school: the role of the built environment.机动车-行人碰撞与步行上学:建成环境的作用。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):776-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2317. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted.行人自我报告的智能手机使用情况:积极态度和高暴露度会影响分心时过马路的意图。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
7
Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines.菲律宾马尼拉都会区涉及行人的道路交通事故严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Older Adults at Increased Risk as Pedestrians in Victoria, Australia: An Examination of Crash Characteristics and Injury Outcomes.澳大利亚维多利亚州老年行人面临更高风险:碰撞特征与受伤结果研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S161-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061662.
9
Personal injury recovery cost of pedestrian-vehicle collisions in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州行人与车辆碰撞事故的人身伤害恢复成本。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):508-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1115025. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Pedestrian crossing location influences injury severity in urban areas.行人穿越地点影响城市地区的伤害严重程度。
Inj Prev. 2012 Dec;18(6):365-70. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040246. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Assessment of Physical Activity-Related Built Environment in Soweto, South Africa: What Is the Role of Contextual Familiarity?南非索韦托与体育活动相关的建成环境的虚拟评估:情境熟悉度的作用是什么?
J Urban Health. 2024 Dec;101(6):1221-1234. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00914-3. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Trends in transport injuries burden and risk factors among children under 14 years old in China: 1990-2019.中国 1990-2019 年 14 岁以下儿童交通伤害负担及危险因素变化趋势
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):2273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19755-5.
3
Child pedestrian crossing behaviour and associated risk factors in school zones: a video-based observational study in Kampala, Uganda.
儿童在学校区域的过街行为及其相关风险因素:乌干达坎帕拉的基于视频的观察性研究。
Inj Prev. 2024 May 20;30(3):216-223. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044932.
4
An analysis of the adolescents' hazard perception when crossing road from the perspective of personality characteristics based on an eye-tracking study.基于眼动追踪研究的人格特征视角下青少年过道路危险感知分析
PLoS One. 2022 May 6;17(5):e0267309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267309. eCollection 2022.
5
Characteristics and outcomes following motorized and non-motorized vehicular trauma in a resource-limited setting.资源有限环境下机动和非机动车辆创伤后的特点和结局。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52(9):2645-2650. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.035. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Children's fear in traffic and its association with pedestrian decisions.儿童在交通中的恐惧及其与行人决策的关系。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
Profiles of Active Transportation among Children and Adolescents in the Global Matrix 3.0 Initiative: A 49-Country Comparison.《全球矩阵 3.0 倡议中儿童和青少年积极交通方式概况:49 个国家比较》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 18;17(16):5997. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165997.
8
The Road User Behaviours of Chinese Adolescents: Data From China and a Comparison With Adolescents in Other Countries.中国青少年的道路使用者行为:来自中国的数据以及与其他国家青少年的比较。
Ann Glob Health. 2019 May 28;85(1):76. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2452.
9
Evaluation of the effectiveness of traffic calming measures on vehicle speeds and pedestrian injury severity in Ghana.评估加纳交通稳静化措施对车辆速度和行人伤害严重程度的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):336-342. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1581925. Epub 2019 Apr 29.