Suppr超能文献

反式全肩关节置换术后肩峰骨折是否为轻微并发症?:系统评价。

Is Acromial Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty a Negligible Complication?: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(4):427-435. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.427. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and clinical and radiological outcomes of treatment of the fracture.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies that reported the results of treatment of acromial fractures after RTSA. A literature search was conducted by two investigators using four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (2,857 shoulders) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The incidence of acromial fracture after RTSA was 4.0% (114 / 2,857). The mean age of the patients at the time of fracture was 72.9 years (range, 51 to 91 years). The mean time from RTSA to diagnosis of acromial fracture was 9.4 months (range, 1 to 94 months). One hundred shoulders (87.7%) were treated conservatively and 14 shoulders (12.3%) were treated surgically. The mean follow-up period after acromial fracture was 33.8 months. The overall union rate was 50.0% (43.8% for conservative treatment and 87.5% for operative treatment). The fracture incidence was significantly different among the medial glenoid and medial humerus prosthesis design (8.4%), the lateral glenoid and medial humerus design (4.0%), and the medial glenoid and lateral humerus design (2.8%). The mean values at final follow-up were as follows: visual analog scale score, 2.2; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59.1; Constant score, 59.7; and Simple Shoulder Test, 5.8. The mean forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 102.3°, 92.3°, and 25.8°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acromial fractures after RTSA are a complication neither uncommon nor negligible. In the absence of studies with high-level evidence, there is a controversy on the outcomes after treatment. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies with a long-term follow-up should be performed to ascertain the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of acromial fractures after RTSA.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后肩峰骨折的发生率以及骨折治疗的临床和影像学结果。

方法

通过两位研究者使用四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 和 Ovid Medline)进行系统评价,以确定报道 RTSA 后肩峰骨折治疗结果的研究。

结果

15 项研究(2857 个肩关节)符合纳入标准。RTSA 后肩峰骨折的发生率为 4.0%(114/2857)。骨折时患者的平均年龄为 72.9 岁(5191 岁)。从 RTSA 到肩峰骨折诊断的平均时间为 9.4 个月(194 个月)。100 个肩关节(87.7%)采用保守治疗,14 个肩关节(12.3%)采用手术治疗。肩峰骨折后的平均随访时间为 33.8 个月。总体愈合率为 50.0%(保守治疗为 43.8%,手术治疗为 87.5%)。内侧盂肱假体设计和外侧盂肱假体设计(8.4%)、内侧盂肱假体设计和外侧盂肱假体设计(4.0%)以及内侧盂肱假体设计和外侧盂肱假体设计(2.8%)之间的骨折发生率差异有统计学意义。末次随访时的平均数值如下:视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分 2.2,美国肩肘外科协会(ASES)评分 59.1,Constant 评分 59.7,简易肩功能测试(Simple Shoulder Test)评分 5.8。肩关节前屈、外展和外旋的平均角度分别为 102.3°、92.3°和 25.8°。

结论

RTSA 后肩峰骨折是一种并不罕见且不容忽视的并发症。在缺乏高质量证据的研究情况下,关于治疗后结果存在争议。需要进一步开展设计良好的前瞻性随机对照研究,并进行长期随访,以明确 RTSA 后肩峰骨折的诊断、治疗和预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/944b/6867909/1633acbc6289/cios-11-427-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验