• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于更新导航器自身定位的提示组合,而不是家庭位置。

Cue combination used to update the navigator's self-localization, not the home location.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alberta.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Dec;46(12):2314-2339. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000794. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000794
PMID:31789563
Abstract

This study investigated when the Bayesian cue combination of piloting and path integration occurs in human homing behaviors. The Bayesian cue combination was hypothesized to occur in estimating the home location or self-localization. In Experiment 1, the participants learned the locations of 5 objects (1 located at the learning position) in the presence of distal landmarks before walking a 2-leg path without viewing the landmarks and objects. At the end of the path, the participants indicated the original locations of the objects in 4 cue conditions: (a) path integration only, (b) landmarks only where the participants were disoriented and the landmarks reappeared, (c) both path integration and the reappearing landmarks, and (d) path integration and conflicting landmarks rotated 45°. The participants' heading, position, and homing estimations were calculated. The ratio of the length of the second leg to that of the first leg was manipulated to be 0.5, 1, or 2. The results showed evidence of the Bayesian cue combination for heading estimates in all leg ratios, and for homing estimates in a small leg ratio (0.5) but not in a large leg ratio (2). The following experiments replicated the results of the Bayesian cue combination for heading but not for homing estimates for the large leg ratio (2) when participants did a typical homing task without learning the locations of objects (Experiment 2) and when proximal landmarks replaced distal landmarks (Experiments 3-4). These findings suggest that the Bayesian cue combination occurs in self-localization prior to homing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究探讨了贝叶斯线索组合在人类归巢行为中何时发生。假设贝叶斯线索组合发生在估计归巢位置或自我定位时。在实验 1 中,参与者在行走没有观察地标和物体的两段路径之前,在存在远距离地标时学习 5 个物体(1 个位于学习位置)的位置。在路径的尽头,参与者在 4 种线索条件下指示物体的原始位置:(a)仅路径集成,(b)参与者迷失方向且地标重新出现时仅地标,(c)路径集成和重新出现的地标,以及(d)路径集成和冲突的地标旋转 45°。计算参与者的航向、位置和归巢估计。第二腿的长度与第一腿的长度之比被操纵为 0.5、1 或 2。结果表明,在所有腿比中,对航向估计存在贝叶斯线索组合的证据,在小腿比(0.5)中对归巢估计存在证据,但在大腿比(2)中不存在。在以下实验中,当参与者在没有学习物体位置的情况下进行典型的归巢任务时(实验 2)以及当近端地标代替远端地标时(实验 3-4),复制了贝叶斯线索组合对于大腿比(2)的航向但不是归巢估计的结果。这些发现表明,贝叶斯线索组合在归巢前发生在自我定位中。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Cue combination used to update the navigator's self-localization, not the home location.用于更新导航器自身定位的提示组合,而不是家庭位置。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Dec;46(12):2314-2339. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000794. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
2
Cue combination in goal-oriented navigation.目标导向导航中的线索组合。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1981-2001. doi: 10.1177/17470218211015796. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment.在大规模沉浸式虚拟环境中驾驶时选择性重置位置和航向估计。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):335-350. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5417-x. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Piloting systems reset path integration systems during position estimation.试点系统在位置估计期间重置路径积分系统。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Mar;43(3):472-491. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000324. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Relative cue precision and prior knowledge contribute to the preference of proximal and distal landmarks in human orientation.
Cognition. 2024 Jun;247:105772. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105772. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Path integration, rather than being suppressed, is used to update spatial views in familiar environments with constantly available landmarks.路径整合并非被抑制,而是用于在熟悉的环境中更新空间视图,其中有不断可用的地标。
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105662. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
Dissociating position and heading estimations: rotated visual orientation cues perceived after walking reset headings but not positions.分离位置和方向估计:行走后感知到的旋转视觉方向线索会重置方向但不会重置位置。
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):553-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
8
How you get there from here: interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation.你如何从这里到达那里:人类导航中视觉地标与路径整合的相互作用。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):915-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797615574952. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.线索整合用于对共同学习的地标进行空间搜索,而非用于对单独学习的地标进行空间搜索。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1857-1871. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000416. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.导航过程中环境线索与路径整合的最佳组合。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):89-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0747-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Test-retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: Accuracy, variability, and cue weighting.导航过程中视觉与自我运动线索组合的重测信度:准确性、变异性和线索权重
Spat Cogn Comput. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553.
2
Frontal-midline theta and posterior alpha oscillations index early processing of spatial representations during active navigation.额中线θ波和后顶叶α波振荡指数在主动导航过程中对空间表象的早期加工。
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
3
Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.
人类空间导航过程中的统计最优线索整合
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1621-1642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02254-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
Spatial memory distortions for the shapes of walked paths occur in violation of physically experienced geometry.在违背物理经验几何的情况下,会出现对走过路径形状的空间记忆扭曲。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0281739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281739. eCollection 2023.
5
Does path integration contribute to human navigation in large-scale space?在大尺度空间中,路径整合是否有助于人类导航?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):822-842. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02216-8. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction.在估计朝向时,路径整合与地标导航的组合与竞争。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Feb 10;18(2):e1009222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009222. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Integration of visual landmark cues in spatial memory.视觉地标线索在空间记忆中的整合。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1636-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01581-8. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Vestibular cues improve landmark-based route navigation: A simulated driving study.前庭线索能提高基于地标物的路线导航:一项模拟驾驶研究。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Nov;49(8):1633-1644. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01181-2. Epub 2021 May 20.
9
Cue combination in goal-oriented navigation.目标导向导航中的线索组合。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1981-2001. doi: 10.1177/17470218211015796. Epub 2021 May 12.