Sjolund Lori A, Kelly Jonathan W, McNamara Timothy P
Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, W112 Lagomarcino Hall, Ames, IA, 50011-3180, USA.
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):89-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0747-7.
Navigation is influenced by body-based self-motion cues that are integrated over time, in a process known as path integration, as well as by environmental cues such as landmarks and room shape. In two experiments we explored whether humans combine path integration and environmental cues (Exp. 1: room shape; Exp. 2: room shape, single landmark, and multiple landmarks) to reduce response variability when returning to a previously visited location. Participants walked an outbound path in an immersive virtual environment before attempting to return to the path origin. Path integration and an environmental cue were both available during the outbound path, but experimental manipulations created single- and dual-cue conditions during the return path. The response variance when returning to the path origin was reduced when both cues were available, consistent with optimal integration predicted on the basis of Bayesian principles. The findings indicate that humans optimally integrate multiple spatial cues during navigation. Additionally, a large (but not a small) cue conflict caused participants to assign a higher weight to path integration than to environmental cues, despite the relatively greater precision afforded by the environmental cues.
导航受到基于身体的自我运动线索的影响,这些线索会随着时间的推移在一个被称为路径整合的过程中进行整合,同时也受到诸如地标和房间形状等环境线索的影响。在两项实验中,我们探究了人类是否会结合路径整合和环境线索(实验1:房间形状;实验2:房间形状、单个地标和多个地标),以便在返回先前访问过的位置时减少反应变异性。参与者在沉浸式虚拟环境中走出一条路径,然后尝试返回路径起点。在外出路径中,路径整合和环境线索都是可用的,但实验操作在返回路径中创造了单线索和双线索条件。当两种线索都可用时,返回路径起点时的反应方差会降低,这与基于贝叶斯原理预测的最优整合一致。研究结果表明,人类在导航过程中会最优地整合多种空间线索。此外,尽管环境线索提供了相对更高的精度,但大(而非小)的线索冲突会导致参与者赋予路径整合比环境线索更高的权重。