Departments of Anesthesiology.
Neurosurgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;33(3):239-246. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000664.
Glioma is associated with high recurrence and poor survival, despite the success of tumor resection surgery. This may be partly because the immune microenvironment within a glioma is susceptible to perioperative immunosuppression. Therefore, intraoperative anesthesia-related immunomodulators, such as scalp block, intravenous anesthesia, the opioid dosage administered, and transfusions, may influence oncological outcomes among patients with glioma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the influence of anesthetic techniques on oncological outcomes after craniotomy for glioma resection, particularly the effects of scalp block, intravenous anesthesia, and inhalation anesthesia.
Consecutive patients who underwent primary glioma resection surgeries between January 2010 and December 2017 were analyzed to compare postcraniotomy oncological outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival) by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis. A propensity score-matched regression analysis including prognostic covariates was also conducted to analyze the selected relevant anesthetic factors of the unmatched regression model.
A total of 230 patients were included in the final analysis. No analyzed anesthetic factor was associated with overall survival. Patients who received scalp block had a more favorable median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (55.37 [95% CI, 12.63-62.23] vs. 14.07 [95% CI, 11.27-17.67] mo; P=0.0053). Scalp block was associated with improved PFS before (hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% CI, 0.272-0.794; P=0.0050) and after (hazard ratio, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.173-0.779; P=0.0091) propensity score-matched Cox regression analysis. By contrast, intravenous anesthesia, amount of opioid consumed, and transfusion were not associated with PFS.
The study results suggest that the scalp block improves the recurrence profiles of patients receiving primary glioma resection.
尽管肿瘤切除术取得了成功,但胶质瘤仍然与高复发率和生存率低有关。这可能部分是因为胶质瘤内的免疫微环境容易受到围手术期免疫抑制的影响。因此,术中与麻醉相关的免疫调节剂,如头皮阻滞、静脉麻醉、给予的阿片类药物剂量和输血,可能会影响胶质瘤患者的肿瘤学结局。本回顾性研究旨在探讨麻醉技术对胶质瘤切除术后肿瘤学结局的影响,特别是头皮阻滞、静脉麻醉和吸入麻醉的影响。
分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受原发性胶质瘤切除术的连续患者,以比较术后肿瘤学结局(无进展生存期 [PFS] 和总生存期),使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和多变量 Cox 回归分析。还进行了倾向评分匹配回归分析,包括预后协变量,以分析未匹配回归模型中选定的相关麻醉因素。
共有 230 例患者纳入最终分析。没有分析的麻醉因素与总生存期相关。接受头皮阻滞的患者中位(95%置信区间 [CI])PFS 更有利(55.37 [95%CI,12.63-62.23] vs. 14.07 [95%CI,11.27-17.67] mo;P=0.0053)。头皮阻滞与术前(风险比,0.465;95%CI,0.272-0.794;P=0.0050)和术后(风险比,0.367;95%CI,0.173-0.779;P=0.0091)倾向评分匹配 Cox 回归分析均与 PFS 相关。相比之下,静脉麻醉、阿片类药物的使用量和输血与 PFS 无关。
研究结果表明头皮阻滞改善了接受原发性胶质瘤切除术患者的复发情况。