Ma Shiyang, McDermott Michael P
Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Stat Med. 2020 Mar 15;39(6):757-772. doi: 10.1002/sim.8444. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
In the process of developing drugs, proof-of-concept studies can be helpful in determining whether there is any evidence of a dose-response relationship. A global test for this purpose that has gained popularity is a component of the multiple comparisons procedure with modeling techniques (MCP-Mod), which involves the specification of a candidate set of several plausible dose-response models. For each model, a test is performed for significance of an optimally chosen contrast among the sample means. An overall P-value is obtained from the distribution of the maximum of the contrast statistics. This is equivalent to basing the test on the minimum of the P-values arising from these contrast statistics and, hence, can be viewed as a method for combining dependent P-values. We generalize this idea to the use of different statistics for combining the dependent P-values, such as Fisher's combination method or the inverse normal combination method. Simulation studies show that the generalized multiple contrast tests (GMCTs) based on the Fisher and inverse normal methods are generally more powerful than the MCP-Mod procedure based on the minimum of the P-values except for cases where the true dose-response model is, in a sense, near the extremes of the candidate set of dose-response models. The proposed GMCTs can also be used for model selection and dosage selection by employing a closed testing procedure.
在药物研发过程中,概念验证研究有助于确定是否存在剂量反应关系的证据。为此,一种广受欢迎的全局检验是多重比较程序与建模技术(MCP-Mod)的一个组成部分,该程序涉及指定一组几个合理的剂量反应模型的候选集。对于每个模型,对样本均值中最优选择的对比进行显著性检验。通过对比统计量最大值的分布获得一个总体P值。这等同于基于这些对比统计量产生的P值中的最小值进行检验,因此,可以看作是一种合并相关P值的方法。我们将这一思想推广到使用不同的统计量来合并相关P值,如费舍尔合并法或逆正态合并法。模拟研究表明,基于费舍尔法和逆正态法的广义多重对比检验(GMCT)通常比基于P值最小值的MCP-Mod程序更具功效,但在某种意义上,真实剂量反应模型接近剂量反应模型候选集极端情况的情形除外。所提出的GMCT还可通过采用封闭检验程序用于模型选择和剂量选择。