维基百科：为何大众知识资源仍被学术界忽视？
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?
机构信息
Kozminski University, Management in Networked and Digital Societies (MINDS) department, Jagiellonska 59, 03301 Warszawa, Poland.
出版信息
Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz139.
Abstract
Wikipedia is by far the largest online encyclopedia, and the number of errors it contains is on par with the professional sources even in specialized topics such as biology or medicine. Yet, the academic world is still treating it with great skepticism because of the types of inaccuracies present there, the widespread plagiarism from Wikipedia, and historic biases, as well as jealousy regarding the loss of the knowledge dissemination monopoly. This article argues that it is high time not only to acknowledge Wikipedia's quality but also to start actively promoting its use and development in academia.
摘要
维基百科是迄今为止最大的在线百科全书，其包含的错误数量与专业来源相当，即使在生物学或医学等专业领域也是如此。然而，学术界仍然对它持怀疑态度，因为它存在的不准确类型、广泛的维基百科抄袭以及历史偏见，以及对知识传播垄断的丧失的嫉妒。本文认为，现在不仅是承认维基百科的质量的时候了，也是开始积极促进其在学术界的使用和发展的时候了。
相似文献
1
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?维基百科：为何大众知识资源仍被学术界忽视？
Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz139.
2
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科：一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
3
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学：量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
4
Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.维基百科：全球公共卫生促进的关键工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 31;13(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589.
5
Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future.维基百科医学内容的演变：过去、现在和未来。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1122-1129. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208601. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
Is Wikipedia a complete and accurate source for musculoskeletal anatomy?维基百科是肌肉骨骼解剖学完整且准确的信息来源吗？
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Oct;41(10):1187-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02280-1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
[Wikipedia and wikinutrition: key tools for the global promotion of nutrition].[维基百科与维基营养：全球营养推广的关键工具]
Nutr Hosp. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1375-9. doi: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.5.5984.
8
More than 2 billion pairs of eyeballs: Why aren't you sharing medical knowledge on Wikipedia?超过20亿双眼睛：你为什么不在维基百科上分享医学知识呢？
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):90-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111040. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
9
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量：定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.
10
Wikipedia--challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education.维基百科——医学教育提升中的挑战与新视野。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 6;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0309-2.
引用本文的文献
1
A research agenda for encouraging prosocial behaviour on social media.一份关于鼓励社交媒体上亲社会行为的研究议程。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):441-449. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02102-y. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
2
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Wikipedia as an academic service-learning tool in science and technology: higher education case from Siberia.维基百科作为科技领域的学术服务学习工具：来自西伯利亚的高等教育案例
J Community Genet. 2024 Apr;15(2):147-161. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00692-6. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Wikipedia as a tool for contemporary history of science: A case study on CRISPR.维基百科作为科学当代史的工具：以 CRISPR 为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0290827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290827. eCollection 2023.
5
Ten quick tips for editing Wikidata.编辑维基数据的十条快速提示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 20;19(7):e1011235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011235. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Wikipedia page views for health research: a review.维基百科健康研究页面浏览量：一项综述
Front Big Data. 2023 Jul 4;6:1199060. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1199060. eCollection 2023.
7
Medical Education 4.0: A Neurology Perspective.医学教育4.0：神经学视角
Cureus. 2022 Nov 19;14(11):e31668. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31668. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
What's hot and what's not in lay psychology: Wikipedia's most-viewed articles.大众心理学中的热门与冷门：维基百科浏览量最高的文章。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Oct 12:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03826-0.
9
Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.需要引用？COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的维基百科文献计量学。
Gigascience. 2022 Jan 12;11(1). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab095.
10
Student usage of open educational resources and social media at a Sri Lanka Medical School.斯里兰卡医学院学生对开放教育资源和社交媒体的使用情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03106-2.
本文引用的文献
1
Is Wikipedia a complete and accurate source for musculoskeletal anatomy?维基百科是肌肉骨骼解剖学完整且准确的信息来源吗？
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Oct;41(10):1187-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02280-1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
2
Submit a Topic Page to PLOS Computational Biology and Wikipedia.向《公共科学图书馆·计算生物学》和维基百科提交一个主题页面。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 May 31;14(5):e1006137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006137. eCollection 2018 May.
3
Academics can help shape Wikipedia.学者可以帮助塑造维基百科。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):557-558. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0462. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
4
Gene Wiki Reviews-Raising the quality and accessibility of information about the human genome.基因维基评论——提升人类基因组信息的质量与可获取性。
Gene. 2016 Nov 5;592(2):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.053. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
HUMAN COMPUTATION. The power of crowds.人类计算。群体的力量。
Science. 2016 Jan 1;351(6268):32-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6499.
6
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head.互联网百科全书正面交锋。
Nature. 2005 Dec 15;438(7070):900-1. doi: 10.1038/438900a.
Zotero 插件