• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。

Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2024.1730
PMID:39119167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11305477/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Wikipedia is the most frequently accessed online health information resource and is well positioned as a valuable tool for public health communication and knowledge translation. The authors aimed to explore their institution's health and medical research reach by analyzing its presence in Wikipedia articles.

METHODS

In October 2022, a comprehensive database search was constructed in PubMed to retrieve clinical evidence syntheses published by at least one author affiliated with McMaster University from 2017 to 2022, inclusive. Altmetric Explorer was queried using PubMed Identifiers and article titles to access metadata and Wikipedia citation data. 3,582 health evidence syntheses from at least one McMaster University affiliated author were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six percent (n=219) of health evidence syntheses from the authors' institution were cited 568 times in 524 unique Wikipedia articles across 28 different language editions. 45% of citations appeared in English Wikipedia, suggesting a broad global reach for the institutions' research outputs. When adjusted for open access publications, 8% of McMaster University's health evidence syntheses appear in Wikipedia.

CONCLUSION

Altmetric Explorer is a valuable tool for exploring the reach of an institution's research outputs. Isolating Altmetric data to focus on Wikipedia citations has value for any institution wishing to gain more insight into the global, community-level reach of its contributions to the latest health and medical evidence.

摘要

目的

维基百科是最常被访问的在线健康信息资源,它是公共卫生交流和知识转化的宝贵工具。作者旨在通过分析其在维基百科文章中的存在来探讨其机构的健康和医学研究影响力。

方法

在 2022 年 10 月,在 PubMed 中构建了一个全面的数据库搜索,以检索至少有一位麦马斯特大学附属作者发表的 2017 年至 2022 年期间的临床证据综合。使用 PubMed 标识符和文章标题在 Altmetric Explorer 中查询元数据和维基百科引文数据。分析了至少有一位麦马斯特大学附属作者的 3582 项健康证据综合。

结果

作者机构的健康证据综合中有 6%(n=219)被引用了 568 次,出现在 28 种不同语言版本的 524 篇独特的维基百科文章中。45%的引文出现在英文维基百科中,表明该机构的研究成果在全球范围内得到了广泛的关注。当调整为开放获取出版物时,麦马斯特大学的健康证据综合中有 8%出现在维基百科中。

结论

Altmetric Explorer 是探索机构研究成果影响力的有用工具。将 Altmetric 数据隔离出来关注维基百科引文,对于任何希望更深入了解其对最新健康和医学证据的全球、社区层面影响力的机构都具有价值。

相似文献

1
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential.妇产科研究的 Altmetric 和文献计量分析:公众参与对引文潜力的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):300.e1-300.e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.任何人都可以编辑的参考文献:同行评议的健康科学文献中对维基百科引文的审查。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 6;348:g1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1585.
4
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.维基百科所评选的最具影响力医学期刊:定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 18;21(1):e11429. doi: 10.2196/11429.
5
'WP2Cochrane', a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance.WP2Cochrane,一种将维基百科与考科蓝图书馆链接起来的工具:对文章质量和重要性进行文献计量分析的结果。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):1881-1897. doi: 10.1177/1460458219892711. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded. A bibliometric analysis for 1958 - 2012.《科学引文索引扩展版》中医疗保健科学与服务领域的高被引文章。1958 - 2012年的文献计量分析
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):446-58. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0022. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
7
Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.需要引用?COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的维基百科文献计量学。
Gigascience. 2022 Jan 12;11(1). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab095.
8
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学:量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
9
Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology: A Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis from 2005 to 2022.《伊朗过敏、哮喘与免疫学杂志》:2005年至2022年的文献计量学与替代计量学分析
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Feb 11;23(1):29-51. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v23i1.14952.
10
Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia.维基百科作为生物医学研究的入口:英文维基百科中引用的相对分布与使用情况
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0190046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190046. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Research citations building trust in Wikipedia: Results from a survey of published authors.研究引用增强了对维基百科的信任:对已发表作者的调查结果
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0320334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320334. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels.《柳叶刀倒计时报告 2022:健康在化石燃料面前不堪一击》。
Lancet. 2022 Nov 5;400(10363):1619-1654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Wikipedia in Health Professional Schools: from an Opponent to an Ally.健康专业院校中的维基百科:从对手到盟友
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Sep 29;31(6):2209-2216. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01408-6. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric.根据 Altmetric,媒体和社交媒体对撤回文章的关注。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0248625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248625. eCollection 2021.
4
Investigation of Digital Technology Use in the Transition to Parenting: Qualitative Study.向为人父母转变过程中数字技术使用情况的调查:定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Feb 17;4(1):e25388. doi: 10.2196/25388.
5
Integrating Wikipedia editing into health professions education: a curricular inventory and review of the literature.将维基百科编辑融入卫生专业教育:课程清单及文献综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Dec;9(6):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Knowledge translation: Cochrane, Wikipedia and students initiatives.知识转化:考克兰协作网、维基百科与学生倡议
Medwave. 2020 Mar 26;20(2):e7859. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2020.02.7859.
7
Adding evidence of the effects of treatments into relevant Wikipedia pages: a randomised trial.将治疗效果的证据添加到相关的维基百科页面中:一项随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e033655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033655.
8
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review.将维基百科置于不同情境下的健康信息资源:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 18;15(2):e0228786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228786. eCollection 2020.
9
Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.通过维基百科看科学:通过共引网络呈现的开放知识新形式
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228713. eCollection 2020.
10
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?维基百科:为何大众知识资源仍被学术界忽视?
Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz139.