• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维基百科医学内容的演变:过去、现在和未来。

Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1122-1129. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208601. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2016-208601
PMID:28847845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5847101/
Abstract

As one of the most commonly read online sources of medical information, Wikipedia is an influential public health platform. Its medical content, community, collaborations and challenges have been evolving since its creation in 2001, and engagement by the medical community is vital for ensuring its accuracy and completeness. Both the encyclopaedia's internal metrics as well as external assessments of its quality indicate that its articles are highly variable, but improving. Although content can be edited by anyone, medical articles are primarily written by a core group of medical professionals. Diverse collaborative ventures have enhanced medical article quality and reach, and opportunities for partnerships are more available than ever. Nevertheless, Wikipedia's medical content and community still face significant challenges, and a socioecological model is used to structure specific recommendations. We propose that the medical community should prioritise the accuracy of biomedical information in the world's most consulted encyclopaedia.

摘要

作为最常被阅读的在线医学信息来源之一,维基百科是一个有影响力的公共卫生平台。自 2001 年创建以来,其医学内容、社区、合作和挑战一直在不断发展,医学领域的参与对于确保其准确性和完整性至关重要。百科全书的内部指标以及对其质量的外部评估都表明,其文章的质量差异很大,但在不断提高。虽然任何人都可以编辑内容,但医学文章主要由一群核心医学专业人员撰写。各种合作项目提高了医学文章的质量和影响力,合作机会比以往任何时候都更加丰富。然而,维基百科的医学内容和社区仍然面临着重大挑战,社会生态学模型被用来构建具体的建议。我们提出,医学界应该优先考虑世界上最受欢迎的百科全书中生物医学信息的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/b22e84f1cd85/jech-2016-208601f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/8f3dbfcf205f/jech-2016-208601f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/1b12b6e918b6/jech-2016-208601f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/0106ce8ef21b/jech-2016-208601f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/e7c1f5096eac/jech-2016-208601f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/b22e84f1cd85/jech-2016-208601f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/8f3dbfcf205f/jech-2016-208601f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/1b12b6e918b6/jech-2016-208601f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/0106ce8ef21b/jech-2016-208601f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/e7c1f5096eac/jech-2016-208601f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b05/5847101/b22e84f1cd85/jech-2016-208601f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future.维基百科医学内容的演变:过去、现在和未来。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1122-1129. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208601. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
2
Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.维基百科:全球公共卫生促进的关键工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 31;13(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589.
3
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学:量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
4
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科:一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
5
Integrating Wikipedia editing into health professions education: a curricular inventory and review of the literature.将维基百科编辑融入卫生专业教育:课程清单及文献综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Dec;9(6):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Using health information technology to prevent and treat diabetes.利用健康信息技术预防和治疗糖尿病。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15 Suppl 1:S60-74. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.1507.
7
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?维基百科:为何大众知识资源仍被学术界忽视?
Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz139.
8
Motivations for contributing to health-related articles on Wikipedia: an interview study.为维基百科上与健康相关的文章做贡献的动机:一项访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 3;16(12):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3569.
9
WikiProject Medicine making progress.维基医学计划正在取得进展。
CMAJ. 2015 Mar 3;187(4):245. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4982. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for crowdsourcing hearing health information: a comparative study of educational programs and volunteer-based campaigns on Wikimedia.众包听力健康信息的策略:Wikimedia 上教育项目和志愿者活动的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):2646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20105-8.
2
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.
3
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.

本文引用的文献

1
Access, attitudes and training in information technologies and evidence-based medicine among medical students at University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences.津巴布韦大学健康科学学院医学生对信息技术和循证医学的获取、态度及培训情况
Afr Health Sci. 2016 Sep;16(3):860-865. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i3.29.
2
Growing Wikipedia Across Languages via Recommendation.通过推荐实现维基百科跨语言发展。
Proc Int World Wide Web Conf. 2016 Apr;2016:975-985. doi: 10.1145/2872427.2883077.
3
Medical journals and Wikipedia: a global health matter.医学期刊与维基百科:一个全球健康问题。
维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study.评估维基百科和百度百科中关于肠易激综合征信息的医学信息:比较研究。
PeerJ. 2024 May 24;12:e17264. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17264. eCollection 2024.
5
Who are the "Heroes of CRISPR"? Public science communication on Wikipedia and the challenge of micro-notability.谁是“CRISPR 英雄”?维基百科上的公众科学传播与微知名度的挑战
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Oct;33(7):918-934. doi: 10.1177/09636625241229923. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss: 50 Years of Research and Recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.预防职业性听力损失:美国国家职业安全与健康研究所50年的研究与建议
Semin Hear. 2023 Aug 3;44(4):351-393. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769499. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Wikipedia page views for health research: a review.维基百科健康研究页面浏览量:一项综述
Front Big Data. 2023 Jul 4;6:1199060. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1199060. eCollection 2023.
8
A Study on User-Oriented Subjects of Child Abuse on Wikipedia: Temporal Analysis of Wikipedia History Versions and Traffic Data.基于用户导向的维基百科儿童虐待主题研究:维基百科历史版本和流量数据的时间分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e43901. doi: 10.2196/43901.
9
The Promotion of Hearing Health through Wikipedia Campaigns: Article Quality and Reach Assessment.通过维基百科活动促进听力健康:文章质量与传播范围评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 27;11(11):1572. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111572.
10
Using logical constraints to validate statistical information about disease outbreaks in collaborative knowledge graphs: the case of COVID-19 epidemiology in Wikidata.使用逻辑约束来验证协作知识图谱中有关疾病爆发的统计信息:以维基数据中的COVID-19流行病学为例。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Sep 29;8:e1085. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1085. eCollection 2022.
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e791. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30254-6.
4
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科:一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
5
Profiles: Kudos for female Antarctic researchers.简介:向南极女研究人员致敬。
Nature. 2016 Aug 11;536(7615):148. doi: 10.1038/536148b.
6
Gene Wiki Reviews-Raising the quality and accessibility of information about the human genome.基因维基评论——提升人类基因组信息的质量与可获取性。
Gene. 2016 Nov 5;592(2):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.053. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Wikidata as a semantic framework for the Gene Wiki initiative.维基数据作为基因维基计划的语义框架。
Database (Oxford). 2016 Mar 17;2016. doi: 10.1093/database/baw015. Print 2016.
8
Utilizing the Wikidata system to improve the quality of medical content in Wikipedia in diverse languages: a pilot study.利用维基数据系统提高维基百科中多种语言医学内容的质量:一项试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 5;17(5):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4163.
9
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学:量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
10
The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson's disease.英文维基百科上关于帕金森病的文章的可读性。
Neurol Sci. 2015 Jun;36(6):1045-6. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2077-5. Epub 2015 Jan 18.