• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种解决多猫问题家庭福利干预的新方法。

A novel approach to welfare interventions in problem multi-cat households.

机构信息

Greater Manchester Animal Hospital, 411 Eccles New Road, Salford, M5 5NN, UK.

Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, College Road, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2019 Dec 3;15(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2183-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12917-019-2183-3
PMID:31796018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6891977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thousands of injured, stray and relinquished cats are received at the RSPCA Greater Manchester Animal Hospital each year. A significant and challenging proportion of these cats are confiscated from multicat households by RSPCA Inspectors, due to the owners' inability to care for them. These households share many characteristics of animal hoarding, including poor owner compliance with suggested welfare improvements and recidivism. The relatively poor adoption potential of animals from such households are a perennial problem for the charity. The aim of this study was to determine if offering female cat neutering assistance to multi-cat owners significantly improved colony welfare.

RESULTS

Ten multicat households with a history of public complaint to the RSPCA were recruited. An RSPCA veterinary surgeon (VS) initially assessed the overall welfare of each household's cat population, individual cat welfare and the living environment. All entire female cats aged over 8 weeks were neutered and basic animal care education provided. Follow up visits were completed two and 12 months later to reassess welfare parameters and population numbers. The total number of cats was 176 across ten households (range 7-33, median 16). All owners consented to having all entire female cats spayed. At the first visit, mean individual cat welfare scores ranged from 5.4-8.7/ 16 across the 10 households, where 16 represented best possible welfare. Overall household mean welfare scores were significantly improved at both the 2 month and 12 month revisits (p = 0.011 and p = 0.01 respectively) when compared to the initial visits. By the end of the study period, three out of the ten households had voluntarily relinquished all of their cats, and overall there was a 40% reduction in the number of cats.

CONCLUSIONS

Animal hoarding has previously been an intractable welfare concern with little evidence informing intervention techniques. These results show that positive veterinary engagement on site, focused on preventative care and population control, can yield significant improvement in welfare scoring systems in relatively short timescales. Promptly collecting and neutering all female cats at a site, combined with advice and support, show promise in improving welfare.

摘要

背景

每年,RSPCA 大曼彻斯特动物医院都会接收数千只受伤、流浪和被遗弃的猫。这些猫中有相当大的一部分是由 RSPCA 检查员从多猫家庭中没收的,因为这些猫的主人无法照顾它们。这些家庭与动物囤积有许多共同特征,包括主人对改善福利建议的配合度差和累犯。从这些家庭收养动物的相对较差的潜力是慈善机构的一个长期问题。本研究的目的是确定为多猫主人提供母猫绝育援助是否能显著改善群体福利。

结果

招募了 10 个有 RSPCA 投诉史的多猫家庭。一名 RSPCA 兽医(VS)首先评估了每个家庭的猫群的整体福利、每只猫的福利和生活环境。所有 8 周以上的所有母猫都进行了绝育手术,并提供了基本的动物护理教育。在 2 个月和 12 个月后进行了随访,以重新评估福利参数和种群数量。十个家庭共有 176 只猫(范围为 7-33,中位数为 16)。所有主人都同意让所有的母猫都做绝育手术。在第一次访问时,10 个家庭的每只猫的福利评分从 5.4-8.7/16 不等,其中 16 代表最佳的福利。与初次访问相比,在 2 个月和 12 个月的复查时,整个家庭的平均福利评分显著提高(p=0.011 和 p=0.01 分别)。在研究结束时,10 个家庭中有 3 个自愿放弃了他们所有的猫,总的来说,猫的数量减少了 40%。

结论

动物囤积一直是一个难以解决的福利问题,几乎没有证据表明干预技术的有效性。这些结果表明,现场积极的兽医干预,重点是预防保健和种群控制,可以在相对较短的时间内显著提高福利评分系统。在现场迅速收集和绝育所有母猫,并提供建议和支持,显示出改善福利的前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a0/6891977/c58dc733db17/12917_2019_2183_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a0/6891977/59874774d069/12917_2019_2183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a0/6891977/c58dc733db17/12917_2019_2183_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a0/6891977/59874774d069/12917_2019_2183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a0/6891977/c58dc733db17/12917_2019_2183_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel approach to welfare interventions in problem multi-cat households.一种解决多猫问题家庭福利干预的新方法。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Dec 3;15(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2183-3.
2
The neuter status of cats at four and six months of age is strongly associated with the owners' intended age of neutering.猫在四个月和六个月大时的中性状态与主人计划的绝育年龄密切相关。
Vet Rec. 2013 Jun 1;172(22):578. doi: 10.1136/vr.101362. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
3
The environmental needs of many Australian pet cats are not being met.许多澳大利亚宠物猫的环境需求未得到满足。
J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Oct;22(10):898-906. doi: 10.1177/1098612X19890189. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
The contribution of cat owners' attitudes and behaviours to the free-roaming cat overpopulation in Tel Aviv, Israel.以色列特拉维夫猫主人的态度和行为对流浪猫过剩的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Apr 1;104(1-2):125-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.006. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
5
Influence of living in a multicat household on health and behaviour in a cohort of cats from the United Kingdom.生活在多猫家庭对英国一组猫的健康和行为的影响。
Vet Rec. 2020 Jul;187(1):27. doi: 10.1136/vr.104801.
6
Risk factors for redemption of feline neutering vouchers issued by welfare organisations.福利组织发放的猫绝育代金券赎回的风险因素。
Vet Rec. 2017 Oct 21;181(16):427. doi: 10.1136/vr.104379. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM II: current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare.生物伦理学研讨会二:影响动物认知及其福利的当前因素
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):1821-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
8
Demographics and husbandry of pet cats living in Sydney, Australia: results of cross-sectional survey of pet ownership.澳大利亚悉尼宠物猫的人口统计学特征与饲养情况:宠物拥有情况横断面调查结果
J Feline Med Surg. 2009 Jun;11(6):449-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
9
Risk factors for relinquishment of cats to an animal shelter.将猫送到动物收容所的风险因素。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996 Aug 1;209(3):582-8.
10
Early-age neutering of dogs and cats in the United States (a review).美国犬猫的早期绝育(综述)
J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2001;57:223-32.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Approach to Engaging Communities Through the Use of Human Behaviour Change Models to Improve Companion Animal Welfare and Reduce Relinquishment.一种通过运用人类行为改变模型来吸引社区参与,以改善伴侣动物福利并减少遗弃行为的新方法。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;15(7):1036. doi: 10.3390/ani15071036.
2
Animal Hoarding: a systematic review.动物囤积:一项系统综述。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2023 May 1;45(4):356-65. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2022-3003.
3
The Impact of Lethal, Enforcement-Centred Cat Management on Human Wellbeing: Exploring Lived Experiences of Cat Carers Affected by Cat Culling at the Port of Newcastle.

本文引用的文献

1
A description of 17 animal hoarding case files from animal control and a humane society.描述了来自动物管制和动物保护协会的 17 个动物囤积案例档案。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Feb;272:365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.127. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
2
Females who maltreat animals.虐待动物的女性。
Behav Sci Law. 2018 Nov;36(6):752-765. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2390.
3
Integrating Trap-Neuter-Return Campaigns Into a Social Framework: Developing Long-Term Positive Behavior Change Toward Unowned Cats in Urban Areas.将诱捕-绝育-放归活动融入社会框架:在城市地区培养对流浪猫的长期积极行为改变。
以执法为中心的致命猫管理对人类福祉的影响:探索受纽卡斯尔港猫捕杀影响的养猫者的生活经历。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;13(2):271. doi: 10.3390/ani13020271.
4
Animal hoarding cases in England: Implications for public health services.英国的动物囤积案例:对公共卫生服务的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;10:899378. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.899378. eCollection 2022.
5
Evidence to guide ethical decision-making in the management of older people living in squalor: a narrative review.指导老年人肮脏生活管理中伦理决策的证据:叙事评论。
Intern Med J. 2022 Aug;52(8):1304-1312. doi: 10.1111/imj.15862. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
6
Behavior and adoptability of hoarded cats admitted to an animal shelter.收容所中囤积猫的行为和收养率。
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Aug;24(8):e232-e243. doi: 10.1177/1098612X221102122. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Oct 24;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
4
Animal hoarding: The challenge for mental health, law enforcement, and animal welfare professionals.动物囤积:对心理健康、执法和动物福利专业人员的挑战。
Behav Sci Law. 2018 Nov;36(6):698-716. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2373. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Presidential Address: Team Science Across Disciplines: Advancing CBT Research and Practice on Hoarding.主席演讲:跨学科的团队科学:推进囤积症的 CBT 研究和实践。
Behav Ther. 2018 Sep;49(5):643-652. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
A Collaborative Model for Managing Animal Hoarding Cases.一种管理动物囤积案件的协作模式。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):267-278. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1490183. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Assessing the impact of different persuasive messages on the intentions and behaviour of cat owners: A randomised control trial.评估不同说服性信息对猫主人意图和行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Animal Hoarding Disorder: A new psychopathology?动物囤积症:一种新的精神病理学?
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.030. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Frequency and spatial distribution of animal and object hoarder behavior in Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil.巴西巴拉那州库里蒂巴动物和物品囤积行为的频率及空间分布
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Mar 30;33(2):e00001316. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00001316.
10
Born to roam? Surveying cat owners in Tasmania, Australia, to identify the drivers and barriers to cat containment.天生爱游荡?对澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州的猫主人进行调查,以确定限制猫咪活动的驱动因素和障碍。
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Dec 1;122(3):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 10.