• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字大小如何影响眼球运动的时空间参数?

How does number magnitude influence temporal and spatial parameters of eye movements?

机构信息

Université de Paris, VAC, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jan;238(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05701-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-019-05701-0
PMID:31797009
Abstract

The influence of numerical processing on individuals' behavior is now well documented. The spatial representation of numbers on a left-to-right mental line (i.e., SNARC effect) has been shown to have sensorimotor consequences, the majority of studies being mainly concerned with its impact on the response times. Its impact on the motor programming stage remains less documented, although swiping movement amplitudes have recently been shown to be modulated by number magnitude. Regarding saccadic eye movements, the few available studies have not provided clear-cut conclusions. They showed that spatial-numerical associations modulated ocular drifts, but not the amplitude of memory-guided saccades. Because these studies held saccadic coordinates constant, which might have masked potential numerical effects, we examined whether spontaneous saccadic eye movements (with no saccadic target) could reflect numerical effects. Participants were asked to look either to the left or to the right side of an empty screen to estimate the magnitude (< or > 5) of a centrally presented digit. Latency data confirmed the presence of the classical SNARC and distance effects. More critically, saccade amplitude reflected a numerical effect: participants' saccades were longer for digits far from the standard (1 and 9) and were shorter for digits close to it (4 and 6). Our results suggest that beyond response times, kinematic parameters also offer valuable information for the understanding of the link between numerical cognition and motor programming.

摘要

数值处理对个体行为的影响现在已经有充分的记录。数字在从左到右的心理线上的空间表示(即 SNARC 效应)已被证明具有运动感觉后果,大多数研究主要关注其对反应时间的影响。其对运动编程阶段的影响的记录较少,尽管最近已经表明滑动运动幅度受数字大小的调节。关于眼跳运动,少数可用的研究没有提供明确的结论。它们表明空间-数字关联调节眼漂移,但不调节记忆引导的眼跳幅度。由于这些研究保持眼跳坐标不变,这可能掩盖了潜在的数值效应,我们检查了自发眼跳运动(没有眼跳目标)是否可以反映数值效应。要求参与者向左或向右看空屏幕的一侧,以估计中央呈现的数字的大小(<或> 5)。潜伏期数据证实了经典的 SNARC 和距离效应的存在。更重要的是,眼跳幅度反映了数值效应:参与者的眼跳对于远离标准(1 和 9)的数字更长,对于接近标准的数字更短(4 和 6)。我们的结果表明,除了反应时间之外,运动学参数也为理解数字认知和运动编程之间的联系提供了有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
How does number magnitude influence temporal and spatial parameters of eye movements?数字大小如何影响眼球运动的时空间参数?
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jan;238(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05701-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
2
The programming of sequences of saccades.扫视序列的编排
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):1009-1018. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05481-7. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).数字的空间数字反应编码联合效应受比较指令的调节(并且类似于一些非数字效应)。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):127-37. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0745-2. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of smooth pursuit and illusory stimulus motion.对记忆目标的扫视:平稳跟踪和虚幻刺激运动的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3617-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3617.
5
Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.用于反应选择的左右编码对比不一定必须与数字特征对比相关联才能产生SNARC效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102887. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102887. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.关于健康人类数字表征与空间注意力交互作用的不稳定性和制约因素:文献综述及新实验证据简述
Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:223-56. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Saccade-contingent spatial and temporal errors are absent for saccadic head movements.扫视性头部运动不存在与扫视相关的空间和时间误差。
Cortex. 2005 Apr;41(2):205-12. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70895-5.
8
Disrupting saccadic updating: visual interference prior to the first saccade elicits spatial errors in the secondary saccade in a double-step task.破坏扫视更新:在双步任务中,首次扫视之前的视觉干扰会在二次扫视中引发空间误差。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jun;233(6):1893-905. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4261-5. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
9
The effects of task-relevant saccadic eye movements performed during the encoding of a serial sequence on visuospatial memory performance.在连续序列编码过程中执行的与任务相关的扫视眼动对视觉空间记忆表现的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1519-1529. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4915-6. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect.笛卡尔周围的数字:一项关于三维SNARC效应的预注册研究。
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104111. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104111. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Similarities of SNARC, cognitive Simon, and visuomotor Simon effects in terms of response time distributions, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics.在反应时间分布、手与刺激的接近程度以及时间动态方面,SNARC效应、认知西蒙效应和视运动西蒙效应的相似性。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):607-620. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01866-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: revealed in a cue-based trisection task.空间数字对应编码(SNARC)效应受中央执行控制调节:在基于线索的三分任务中揭示。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2223-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01407-z. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.语义加工和反应潜伏期对SNARC效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 May;196:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
Compatibility between object size and response side in grasping: the left hand prefers smaller objects, the right hand prefers larger objects.抓握时物体大小与反应手的兼容性:左手更喜欢较小的物体,右手更喜欢较大的物体。
PeerJ. 2018 Dec 3;6:e6026. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6026. eCollection 2018.
3
Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.
更靠右:在视觉探索过程中,观察距离会调节注意力不对称性(“假性忽视”)。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Feb;129:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.不同数字形式的 SNARC 效应的时间依赖性:来自眼跳反应的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1485-1495. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1010-y. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
5
Time course of overt attentional shifts in mental arithmetic: Evidence from gaze metrics.心算中明显注意力转移的时间进程:来自注视指标的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):1009-1019. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318931. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
6
Numbers in Action.数字的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 29;10:388. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00388. eCollection 2016.
7
Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic.数字认知洞察:数字处理与算术运算中的眼动注视考量
Psychol Res. 2016 May;80(3):334-59. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0739-9. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.自主眼球运动将注意力引向心理数字空间。
Psychol Res. 2016 May;80(3):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0741-2. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
9
Ocular drift along the mental number line.沿心理数字线的眼动漂移。
Psychol Res. 2016 May;80(3):379-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0731-4. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
10
Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements.计数是一个空间过程:来自眼动的证据。
Psychol Res. 2016 May;80(3):399-409. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0722-5. Epub 2015 Nov 25.