Suppr超能文献

在动物实验中通过动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)定量参数评估恶性骨肿瘤髓内浸润范围

Evaluating the scope of intramedullary invasion of malignant bone tumor by DCE-MRI quantitative parameters in animal study.

作者信息

Zhang Yuan, Tan Yiqing, Dong Cheng, Gao Sai, Xu Wenjian, Chen Haisong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital (Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University), Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China.

Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.

出版信息

J Bone Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;19:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100269. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The purpose was to analyze the value of quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI in evaluating micro-infiltration of malignant bone tumors.

METHODS

Thirty-nine New Zealand white rabbits were used to establish malignant bone tumor models by implanting VX2 tumor fragments into the right tibiae. After three weeks, models were examined by conventional MRI and DCE-MRI; then the right tibiae were cut into sagittal sections and partitioned into histology slices for comparison with microscopic findings. Micro-infiltration groups were selected and the range of infiltration was determined under the microscope, and corresponding DCE images analyzed to obtain the quantitative parameters include and in parenchyma areas, micro-infiltration areas and simple edema areas. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences of the parameters between the three areas. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were plotted to determine the accuracy of different parameters by area under curves (AUCs).

RESULTS

22 cases (22/39, 56.4%) were included in the micro-infiltration group and the infiltration depth ranged from 1.3 mm to 4.6 mm, with an average depth of 3.2 mm ± 0.8 mm. The statistical results of quantitative parameters in the three areas were as follows: values were (0.494 ± 0.052), (0.403  ±  0.049), (0.173 ± 0.047) min ( = =0.000), values were (1.959 ± 0.65), (1.528 ± 0.372), (1.174 ± 0.486) min ( = =0.000), values were (0.247 ± 0.068), (0.283 ± 0.057), (0.168 ± 0.062) min ( = =0.000), values were (0.125 ± 0.036), (0.108 ± 0.033), (0.098 ± 0.025) min ( = =0.022), respectively. and values had significant difference in the three areas after comparing between-groups, respectively. However, there were no significant difference in values between parenchyma and micro-infiltration areas ( = =0.078), micro-infiltration and simple edema areas ( = =0.315), and values between parenchyma and micro-infiltration areas ( = =0.056). The values were higher in parenchyma and micro-infiltration areas then simple edema areas. had highest accuracy in differentiating different areas (AUC > 0.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative parameters and can assess the extent of intramedullary invasion of malignant bone tumors. have highest accuracy in differentiating different regions.

摘要

未标注

目的是分析动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)定量参数在评估恶性骨肿瘤微浸润中的价值。

方法

选用39只新西兰白兔,通过将VX2肿瘤碎片植入右胫骨建立恶性骨肿瘤模型。3周后,对模型进行常规MRI和DCE-MRI检查;然后将右胫骨切成矢状面切片并分成组织学切片,与显微镜下的结果进行比较。选择微浸润组,在显微镜下确定浸润范围,并分析相应的DCE图像以获得定量参数,包括实质区域、微浸润区域和单纯水肿区域的[具体参数1]和[具体参数2]。采用单因素方差分析比较三个区域参数的差异。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),通过曲线下面积(AUC)确定不同参数的准确性。

结果

微浸润组纳入22例(22/39,56.4%),浸润深度为1.3 mm至4.6 mm,平均深度为3.2 mm±0.8 mm。三个区域定量参数的统计结果如下:[具体参数1]值分别为(0.494±0.052)、(0.403±0.049)、(0.173±0.047)min(F=P=0.000),[具体参数2]值分别为(1.959±0.65)、(1.528±0.372)、(1.174±0.486)min(F=P=0.000),[具体参数3]值分别为(0.247±0.068)、(0.283±0.057)、(0.168±0.062)min(F=P=0.000),[具体参数4]值分别为(0.125±0.036)、(0.108±0.033)、(0.098±0.025)min(F=P=0.022)。组间比较后,[具体参数1]和[具体参数2]值在三个区域有显著差异。然而,实质区域和微浸润区域之间的[具体参数3]值无显著差异(P=P=0.078),微浸润区域和单纯水肿区域之间的[具体参数3]值无显著差异(P=P=0.315),实质区域和微浸润区域之间的[具体参数4]值无显著差异(P=P=0.056)。实质区域和微浸润区域的[具体参数1]和[具体参数2]值高于单纯水肿区域。[具体参数1]在区分不同区域方面准确性最高(AUC>0.9)。

结论

定量参数[具体参数1]和[具体参数2]可评估恶性骨肿瘤髓内浸润程度。[具体参数1]在区分不同区域方面准确性最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce5/6881657/2f6fb78bb02e/gr1a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验