Suppr超能文献

糖尿病数字 APP 技术:效益、挑战和建议。欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)糖尿病技术工作组的共识报告。

Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.

机构信息

Kinexum, PO Box 1260, Harpers Ferry, WV, 25425, USA.

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):229-241. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05034-1.

Abstract

Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ('apps'), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardise how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organisations. We found that, across the USA and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organisations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and WHO, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policymakers, professional organisations, researchers, people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardisation, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.

摘要

数字健康技术,尤其是数字医疗应用程序(“apps”),发展迅速,旨在帮助人们管理糖尿病。智能手机和其他无线设备上提供了许多与健康相关的应用程序,可支持需要根据血糖监测数据采取生活方式干预或药物调整的糖尿病患者。然而,监管和指导方针尚未跟上快速发展的步伐,无法规范移动健康应用程序的审查和监测,以确保患者安全和临床有效性。移动健康应用程序,尤其是针对糖尿病的应用程序的安全性和有效性的现有证据仍然有限。因此,欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)对现有的糖尿病数字健康技术(仅指独立的糖尿病应用程序,而不是那些作为受监管医疗器械的一部分,如胰岛素泵、连续血糖监测系统和自动胰岛素输送系统)的现状以及监管机构和组织的实践进行了联合审查。我们发现,在美国和欧洲,除非移动应用程序符合治疗和/或诊断目的的医疗器械的定义,否则用于管理健康和健康的移动应用程序在很大程度上不受监管。包括国际医疗器械监管者论坛和世界卫生组织在内的国际组织在对不同类型的数字健康技术进行分类和将数字健康技术纳入医疗器械领域方面取得了进展。随着糖尿病数字健康领域的不断发展并更加全面地融入日常生活,我们希望确保其基于安全性和有效性的最佳证据。因此,我们提出了一些问题,糖尿病界,包括监管机构、政策制定者、专业组织、研究人员、糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员,需要解决这些问题,以确保糖尿病健康技术能够发挥其全部潜力。这些问题包括应用程序准确性和临床有效性的证据不足、缺乏培训提供、互操作性和标准化差以及数据安全性不足。我们以一系列建议的行动结束,以解决其中的一些不足之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验