Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China.
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;307:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.040. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
The prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) with or without coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization has not been clarified. We sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing FFR-guided revascularization according to the existence of DM and CMD.
A total of 283 patients with available FFR data as well as index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were selected from the 3 V FFR-FRIENDS study. CMD was defined as an IMR ≥25U. Patients were grouped according to the presence of DM and CMD into group A (DM-, CMD-), group B (DM-, CMD+), group C (DM+, CMD-), and group D (DM+, CMD+). The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, and cardiac death) at 2 years.
DM patients displayed a notably higher risk of MACEs in comparison with non-DM patients (HR 4.88, 95% CI 1.54-15.48, p = 0.003). MACEs at 2 years among the four groups were 2.2%, 2.0%, 7.0%, and 18.5%, respectively. Group D exhibited a significantly higher risk of MACEs as compared to group A (HR 8.98, 95% CI 2.15-37.41, p = 0.003). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the presence of DM and CMD was an independent predictor of a 2-year MACE (HR 11.24, 95% CI 2.53-49.88, p = 0.002), and integrating CMD into a model with DM increased discriminant ability (C-index 0.683 vs. 0.710, p = 0.010, integrated discrimination improvement 0.015, p = 0.040).
Among the patients undergoing FFR-guided revascularization, those with DM and CMD were correlated with an augmented risk of MACEs. Integration of CMD improved risk stratification in predicting the occurrence of a MACE.
在接受血流储备分数(FFR)指导的血运重建的患者中,合并或不合并冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)的糖尿病(DM)的预后影响尚未明确。我们旨在研究根据 DM 和 CMD 的存在,接受 FFR 指导的血运重建的患者的临床结局。
从 3V FFR-FRIENDS 研究中选取了 283 例有 FFR 数据和微血管阻力指数(IMR)的患者。CMD 定义为 IMR≥25U。根据 DM 和 CMD 的存在,患者分为 4 组:A 组(DM-,CMD-)、B 组(DM-,CMD+)、C 组(DM+,CMD-)和 D 组(DM+,CMD+)。主要终点为 2 年时的主要不良心脏事件(MACE,包括心肌梗死、缺血驱动的血运重建和心脏性死亡的复合终点)。
与非 DM 患者相比,DM 患者发生 MACE 的风险明显更高(HR 4.88,95%CI 1.54-15.48,p=0.003)。4 组患者 2 年时的 MACE 发生率分别为 2.2%、2.0%、7.0%和 18.5%。与 A 组相比,D 组发生 MACE 的风险显著更高(HR 8.98,95%CI 2.15-37.41,p=0.003)。多变量回归分析显示,DM 的存在和 CMD 是 2 年 MACE 的独立预测因素(HR 11.24,95%CI 2.53-49.88,p=0.002),将 CMD 纳入包含 DM 的模型可提高判别能力(C 指数 0.683 比 0.710,p=0.010,综合判别改善 0.015,p=0.040)。
在接受 FFR 指导的血运重建的患者中,DM 合并 CMD 与 MACE 风险增加相关。CMD 的整合改善了预测 MACE 发生的风险分层。