Hwang Doyeon, Zhang Jinlong, Lee Joo Myung, Doh Joon-Hyung, Nam Chang-Wook, Shin Eun-Seok, Hoshino Masahiro, Murai Tadashi, Yonetsu Taishi, Mejía-Rentería Hernán, Kakuta Tsunekazu, Escaned Javier, Koo Bon-Kwon
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug;74(8):682-690. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Has been performed of the prognostic value of coronary physiological indices in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) after coronary revascularization deferral.
We analyzed 714 patients (235 with DM) with deferred revascularization according to fractional flow reserve (> 0.80). A comprehensive physiological evaluation including coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve was performed at the time of revascularization deferral. The median values of the CFR (2.88), fractional flow reserve (0.88), and index of microcirculatory resistance (17.85) were used to classify patients into high- or low-index groups. The primary outcome was the patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) at 5 years, comprising all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization.
Compared with the non-DM population, the DM population showed higher risk of POCO (HR, 2.49; 95%CI, 1.64-3.78; P<.001). In the DM population, the low-CFR group had a higher risk of POCO than the high-CFR group (HR, 3.22; 95%CI, 1.74-5.97; P <.001). In contrast, CFR values could not differentiate the risk of POCO in the non-DM population. There was a significant interaction between CFR and the presence of DM regarding the risk of POCO (P for interaction=.025). Independent predictors of POCO were a low CFR and family history of coronary artery disease in the DM population and percent diameter stenosis and multivessel disease in the non-DM population.
The association between coronary physiological indices and clinical outcomes differs according to the presence of DM. In deferred patients, CFR is the most important prognostic factor in patients with DM, but not in those without DM.
对冠状动脉血运重建延迟的糖尿病(DM)患者进行了冠状动脉生理指标的预后价值评估。
我们根据血流储备分数(>0.80)分析了714例血运重建延迟的患者(235例患有DM)。在血运重建延迟时进行了包括冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)、微循环阻力指数和血流储备分数在内的全面生理评估。CFR的中位数(2.88)、血流储备分数(0.88)和微循环阻力指数(17.85)被用于将患者分为高指数组或低指数组。主要结局是5年时以患者为导向的综合结局(POCO),包括全因死亡、任何心肌梗死和任何血运重建。
与非DM人群相比,DM人群发生POCO的风险更高(HR,2.49;95%CI,1.64 - 3.78;P<.001)。在DM人群中,低CFR组发生POCO的风险高于高CFR组(HR,3.22;95%CI,1.74 - 5.97;P<.001)。相比之下,CFR值不能区分非DM人群中POCO的风险。关于POCO的风险,CFR与DM的存在之间存在显著交互作用(交互作用P值 =.025)。POCO的独立预测因素在DM人群中是低CFR和冠状动脉疾病家族史,在非DM人群中是直径狭窄百分比和多支血管病变。
冠状动脉生理指标与临床结局之间的关联因是否存在DM而异。在延迟患者中,CFR是DM患者最重要的预后因素,但在非DM患者中并非如此。