Suppr超能文献

教授利益冲突与共同决策以改善风险沟通:一项随机对照试验

Teaching Conflicts of Interest and Shared Decision-Making to Improve Risk Communication: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Koch Cora, Dreimüller Nadine, Weißkircher Janosch, Deis Nicole, Gaitzsch Eva, Wagner Stefanie, Stoll Marlene, Bäßler Franziska, Lieb Klaus, Jünger Jana

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):473-480. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05420-w. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk communication is a core aspect of a physician's work and a fundamental prerequisite for successful shared decision-making. However, many physicians are not able to adequately communicate risks to patients due to a lack of understanding of statistics as well as inadequate management of conflicts of interest (COI).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of an integrated curriculum encompassing COI and shared decision-making on the participants' risk communication competence, that is, their competence to advise patients on the benefits and harms of diagnostic or therapeutic interventions.

DESIGN

A rater-blind randomized controlled trial with a 30 (± 1)-week follow-up conducted from October 2016 to June 2017 at two German academic medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-three medical students in their fourth or fifth year.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants received either a newly developed 15-h curriculum or a course manual adapted from teaching as usual.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcome: change in risk communication performance in a video-observed structured clinical examination (VOSCE).

KEY RESULTS

Participants were 25.7 years old on average (SD 3.6); 73% (46/63) were female. Increase in risk communication performance was significantly higher in the intervention group with post-intervention Cohen's d of 2.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62 to 3.01, p < 0.01) and of 1.83 (CI 1.13 to 2.47, p < 0.01) 30 (± 1) weeks later. Secondary outcomes with the exception of frequency of interactions with the pharmaceutical industry also showed relevant improvements in the intervention as compared with the control group (d between 0.91 and 2.04 (p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that an integrated curriculum encompassing COI and risk communication leads to a large and sustainable increase in risk communication performance. We interpret the large effect sizes to be a result of the integration of topics that are usually taught separately, leading to a more effective organization of knowledge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry with the trial number DRKS00010890.

摘要

背景

风险沟通是医生工作的核心内容,也是成功进行共同决策的基本前提。然而,由于对统计学缺乏理解以及利益冲突管理不当,许多医生无法充分向患者传达风险。

目的

评估一门涵盖利益冲突和共同决策的综合课程对参与者风险沟通能力的影响,即他们就诊断或治疗干预的益处和危害向患者提供建议的能力。

设计

一项评定者盲法随机对照试验,于2016年10月至2017年6月在德国的两个学术医学中心进行,随访30(±1)周。

参与者

63名四、五年级医学生。

干预措施

参与者要么接受新开发的15小时课程,要么接受根据常规教学改编的课程手册。

主要测量指标

主要结局:视频观察结构化临床检查(VOSCE)中风险沟通表现的变化。

关键结果

参与者平均年龄25.7岁(标准差3.6);73%(46/63)为女性。干预组风险沟通表现的提升显著更高,干预后科恩d值为2.35(95%置信区间(CI)1.62至3.01,p<0.01),30(±1)周后为1.83(CI 1.13至2.47,p<0.01)。与对照组相比,除了与制药行业互动频率外,干预组的次要结局也显示出相关改善(d值在0.91至2.04之间(p<0.001))。

结论

我们的结果表明,一门涵盖利益冲突和风险沟通的综合课程可使风险沟通表现大幅且持续提升。我们将较大的效应量解释为通常分开讲授的主题整合的结果,从而实现了更有效的知识组织。

试验注册

该试验已在国际临床试验注册中心注册,试验编号为DRKS00010890。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b84/7018910/3f868b362ed9/11606_2019_5420_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验