Suppr超能文献

德国医学院校利益冲突政策的数量与质量:一项横断面研究与调查

Quantity and quality of conflict of interest policies at German medical schools: a cross-sectional study and survey.

作者信息

Grabitz Peter, Friedmann Zoe, Gepp Sophie, Hess Leonard, Specht Lisa, Struck Maja, Tragert Sophie Kira, Walther Tobias, Klemperer David

机构信息

Universities Allied for Essential Medicines Europe e.V, Berlin, Germany

QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH),Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 30;10(9):e039782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039782.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quantity and evaluate the quality of policies and curricula focusing on conflicts of interests (COI) at medical schools across Germany.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study, survey of medical schools, standardised web search.

SETTING

Medical schools, Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

38 German medical schools.

INTERVENTIONS

We collected relevant COI policies, including teaching activities, by conducting a search of the websites of all 38 German medical schools using standardised keywords for COI policies and teaching. Further, we surveyed all medical schools' dean's offices. Finally, we adapted a scoring system for results we obtained with 13 categories based on prior similar studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Presence or absence of COI-related policies, including teaching activities at medical school. The secondary outcome was the achieved score on a scale from 0 to 26, with high scores representing restrictive policies and sufficient teaching activities.

RESULTS

We identified relevant policies for one medical school via the web search. The response rate of the deans' survey was 16 of 38 (42.1%). In total, we identified COI-related policies for 2 of 38 (5.3%) German medical schools, yet no policy was sufficient to address all COI-related categories that were assessed in this study. The maximum score achieved was 12 of 26. 36 (94.7%) schools scored 0. No medical school reported curricular teaching on COI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate a low level of action by medical schools to protect students from undue commercial influence. No participating dean was aware of any curriculum or instruction on COI at the respective school and only two schools had policies in place. The German Medical Students Association and international counterparts have called for a stronger focus on COI in the classroom. We conclude that for German medical schools, there is still a long way to go.

摘要

目的

评估德国各医学院校中关注利益冲突(COI)的政策和课程的数量并评价其质量。

设计

横断面研究,对医学院校进行调查,采用标准化网络搜索。

地点

德国医学院校。

参与者

38所德国医学院校。

干预措施

我们使用COI政策和教学的标准化关键词,对德国所有38所医学院校的网站进行搜索,收集包括教学活动在内的相关COI政策。此外,我们对所有医学院校的院长办公室进行了调查。最后,我们根据之前的类似研究,采用一个针对13个类别的评分系统来评估我们获得的结果。

主要结局和指标

是否存在与COI相关的政策,包括医学院校的教学活动。次要结局是在0至26分的量表上获得的分数,高分代表限制性政策和充足的教学活动。

结果

通过网络搜索,我们为一所医学院校找到了相关政策。院长调查的回复率为38所中的16所(42.1%)。总共,我们为38所德国医学院校中的2所(5.3%)找到了与COI相关的政策,但没有一项政策足以涵盖本研究中评估的所有与COI相关的类别。获得的最高分是26分中的12分。36所(94.7%)学校得分为0。没有医学院校报告有关COI的课程教学。

结论

我们的结果表明,医学院校在保护学生免受不当商业影响方面的行动水平较低。没有一位参与调查的院长知晓各自学校有任何关于COI的课程或教学内容,只有两所学校制定了相关政策。德国医学生协会和国际同行呼吁在课堂上更加强调COI。我们得出结论,对于德国医学院校来说,还有很长的路要走。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2daf/7528426/b54a2565f343/bmjopen-2020-039782f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验