• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《客户报告的避孕咨询质量量表的制定与验证:测量计划生育项目中的质量和权利实现》

Development and Validation of the Client-Reported Quality of Contraceptive Counseling Scale to Measure Quality and Fulfillment of Rights in Family Planning Programs.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):137-158. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12092. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1111/sifp.12092
PMID:31120147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6618078/
Abstract

We developed the Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC) Scale to improve measurement of client experiences with providers in the era of rights-based service delivery. We generated scale items drawing on the previously published QCC Framework and qualitative research on women's preferences for counseling in Mexico, and refined them through cognitive interviews (n = 29) in two Mexican states. The item pool was reduced from 35 to 22 items after pilot testing using exit interviews in San Luis Potosí (n = 257). Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed three underlying dimensions (Information Exchange, Interpersonal Relationship, Disrespect and Abuse); this dimensionality was reproduced in Mexico City (n = 242) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Item Response Theory analyses confirmed acceptable item properties in both states, and correlation analyses established convergent, predictive, and divergent validity. The QCC Scale and subscales fill a gap in measurement tools for ensuring high quality of care and fulfillment of human rights in contraceptive services, and should be evaluated and adapted in other contexts.

摘要

我们开发了避孕咨询质量(QCC)量表,以改善基于权利的服务提供时代客户对提供者的体验的测量。我们借鉴了先前发表的 QCC 框架和关于墨西哥妇女对咨询偏好的定性研究,生成了量表项目,并通过在两个墨西哥州的认知访谈(n=29)对其进行了完善。在圣路易斯波托西州(n=257)使用退出访谈进行试点测试后,项目池从 35 项减少到 22 项。探索性因素分析显示出三个潜在维度(信息交流、人际关系、不尊重和虐待);这一维度在墨西哥城(n=242)使用验证性因素分析得到了再现。项目反应理论分析在两个州都证实了可接受的项目属性,相关性分析建立了收敛性、预测性和发散性有效性。QCC 量表及其子量表填补了避孕服务中确保高质量护理和履行人权的测量工具的空白,应在其他环境中进行评估和调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/9281a58c117c/SIFP-50-137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/8cfa3573c5b2/SIFP-50-137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/09d17980077b/SIFP-50-137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/9281a58c117c/SIFP-50-137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/8cfa3573c5b2/SIFP-50-137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/09d17980077b/SIFP-50-137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d6/6618078/9281a58c117c/SIFP-50-137-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Client-Reported Quality of Contraceptive Counseling Scale to Measure Quality and Fulfillment of Rights in Family Planning Programs.《客户报告的避孕咨询质量量表的制定与验证:测量计划生育项目中的质量和权利实现》
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):137-158. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12092. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Adaptation and validation of the quality of contraceptive counseling (QCC) scale for use in Ethiopia and India.适应和验证避孕咨询质量(QCC)量表在埃塞俄比亚和印度的使用。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 31;18(3):e0283925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283925. eCollection 2023.
3
Client, provider, and visit factors associated with quality in contraceptive counseling in Mexico: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis.客户、提供者和就诊因素与墨西哥避孕咨询中的质量相关:探索性横断面分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01291-9.
4
Reduction of the Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC) scale to a short version (QCC-10) in Ethiopia, India, and Mexico.在埃塞俄比亚、印度和墨西哥将避孕咨询质量量表(QCC)简化为简短版本(QCC - 10)。
Contraception. 2023 Feb;118:109890. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.128. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Choice, access, information are among clients' rights.选择权、获取权、知情权均属于客户的权利。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1993 Aug;14(1):24-6.
6
Development of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale.人际关系质量计划生育关怀量表(Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale)的简短版,即以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale,PCCC)的研制。
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Development of a patient-reported measure of the interpersonal quality of family planning care.一项患者报告的计划生育护理人际质量测量方法的开发。
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Validation and Predictive Utility of a Person-Centered Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) Scale in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study of Family Planning Clients and a New Indicator for Measuring High-Quality, Rights-Based Care.以患者为中心的避孕咨询质量(QCC-10)量表在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的验证和预测效用:一项针对计划生育服务对象的多国研究及高质量、基于权利的护理新指标
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):119-143. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12229. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
9
Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.开发并现场测试一款决策支持工具,以促进避孕咨询中的共享决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Service delivery characteristics associated with contraceptive use among youth clients in integrated voluntary counseling and HIV testing clinics in Kenya.肯尼亚综合自愿咨询与艾滋病毒检测诊所中与青年客户使用避孕药具相关的服务提供特征。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(10):1290-301. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.658753. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
DMPA-SC self-injection experiences of clients and providers in Uganda: the role of community health workers in reproductive self-care service delivery.乌干达客户和提供者的醋酸甲羟孕酮皮下注射自我注射经历:社区卫生工作者在生殖自我保健服务提供中的作用
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 10;25(Suppl 1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03850-9.
2
[Analysis of the reports of contraceptive service providers in Mexico: between reproductive autonomy and contraceptive coercion].[墨西哥避孕服务提供者报告分析:生殖自主权与避孕强制之间]
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Mar 31;41(2):e00103324. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XES103324. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.可持续发展目标时代的高质量卫生系统:是时候进行一场变革了。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
2
Development of a Person-Centered Family Planning Scale in India and Kenya.在印度和肯尼亚开发以个人为中心的计划生育量表。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):237-258. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12069. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling in Mexico: Results from a focus group study.
Person-centered contraceptive counseling and associations with contraceptive practices among a nationally representative sample of women in Ethiopia.
以个人为中心的避孕咨询以及埃塞俄比亚全国代表性女性样本中避孕措施的相关性。
Contracept X. 2024 Nov 19;6:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100114. eCollection 2024.
4
Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.避孕护理就诊的目标与结果:来自布基纳法索、巴基斯坦和坦桑尼亚的证据。
Stud Fam Plann. 2024 Dec;55(4):315-332. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12279. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
5
Methods and Measures to Assess Health Care Provider Behavior and Behavioral Determinants in Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: A Rapid Review.评估生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康领域医疗服务提供者行为和行为决定因素的方法和措施:快速综述。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Nov 30;11(Suppl 1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00407.
6
Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: The Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM).验证一种用于评估三个中低收入国家计划生育服务中决策自主权的衡量标准:计划生育自主决策量表(FP-ADM)。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0293586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293586. eCollection 2023.
7
Balancing client preferences and population-level goals: a qualitative study of the ways in which public health providers and facility administrators interpret and incentivise quality of care in contraceptive counselling in Ethiopia, Mexico and India.平衡客户偏好和人群目标:埃塞俄比亚、墨西哥和印度公共卫生提供者和医疗机构管理人员在解释和激励避孕咨询中护理质量的方式的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2229220. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2229220.
8
Person-centred sexual and reproductive health: A call for standardized measurement.以人为主导的性与生殖健康:呼吁标准化测量。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1384-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13781. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Adaptation and validation of the quality of contraceptive counseling (QCC) scale for use in Ethiopia and India.适应和验证避孕咨询质量(QCC)量表在埃塞俄比亚和印度的使用。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 31;18(3):e0283925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283925. eCollection 2023.
10
Validation and Predictive Utility of a Person-Centered Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) Scale in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study of Family Planning Clients and a New Indicator for Measuring High-Quality, Rights-Based Care.以患者为中心的避孕咨询质量(QCC-10)量表在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的验证和预测效用:一项针对计划生育服务对象的多国研究及高质量、基于权利的护理新指标
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):119-143. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12229. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
墨西哥女性对避孕咨询的偏好:一项焦点小组研究的结果。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 16;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0569-5.
4
Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights-based Family Planning.基于权利的计划生育背景下修订计划生育优质服务框架。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Jun;49(2):171-179. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12052. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Measuring and monitoring quality of care in family planning: are we ignoring negative experiences?衡量和监测计划生育服务的质量:我们是否忽视了负面经历?
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 May 26;7:97-108. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S101281. eCollection 2016.
6
Methods used in prevalence studies of disrespect and abuse during facility based childbirth: lessons learned.基于医疗机构分娩的不尊重和虐待发生率研究中使用的方法:经验教训。
Reprod Health. 2017 Oct 11;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0389-z.
7
Development of a patient-reported measure of the interpersonal quality of family planning care.一项患者报告的计划生育护理人际质量测量方法的开发。
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Defining quality in contraceptive counseling to improve measurement of individuals' experiences and enable service delivery improvement.界定避孕咨询服务的质量,以改进对个人体验的衡量,并促进服务提供的改善。
Contraception. 2017 Sep;96(3):133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
A call for collaboration on respectful, person-centered health care in family planning and maternal health.呼吁在计划生育和孕产妇保健领域就尊重个人的以患者为中心的医疗保健开展合作。
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 2;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0280-y.
10
Comparison of family-planning service quality reported by adolescents and young adult women in Mexico.墨西哥青少年和年轻成年女性报告的计划生育服务质量比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;134(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Mar 23.