• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测脓毒症危重症患者的临床病程:一项队列研究。

Predicting the clinical trajectory in critically ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Department of Mathematics, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Dec 12;23(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2687-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-019-2687-z
PMID:31831072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6909511/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To develop a mathematical model to estimate daily evolution of disease severity using routinely available parameters in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adults with sepsis and categorized patients as (1) being at risk for developing (more severe) organ dysfunction, (2) having (potentially still reversible) limited organ failure, or (3) having multiple-organ failure. Daily probabilities for transitions between these disease states, and to death or discharge, during the first 2 weeks in ICU were calculated using a multi-state model that was updated every 2 days using both baseline and time-varying information. The model was validated in independent patients.

RESULTS

We studied 1371 sepsis admissions in 1251 patients. Upon presentation, 53 (4%) were classed at risk, 1151 (84%) had limited organ failure, and 167 (12%) had multiple-organ failure. Among patients with limited organ failure, 197 (17%) evolved to multiple-organ failure or died and 809 (70%) improved or were discharged alive within 14 days. Among patients with multiple-organ failure, 67 (40%) died and 91 (54%) improved or were discharged. Treatment response could be predicted with reasonable accuracy (c-statistic ranging from 0.55 to 0.81 for individual disease states, and 0.67 overall). Model performance in the validation cohort was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model that estimates daily evolution of disease severity during sepsis may eventually support clinicians in making better informed treatment decisions and could be used to evaluate prognostic biomarkers or perform in silico modeling of novel sepsis therapies during trial design.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01905033.

摘要

背景

开发一种数学模型,使用重症监护病房(ICU)中常规可用的参数来估计疾病严重程度的每日变化。

方法

在 3 年期间,我们前瞻性地连续招募患有败血症的成年患者,并将患者分为(1)有发展(更严重)器官功能障碍风险的患者,(2)有(潜在的仍然可逆)有限器官衰竭的患者,或(3)有多器官衰竭的患者。使用多状态模型计算这些疾病状态之间以及 ICU 前 2 周内死亡或出院的每日转移概率,该模型每 2 天使用基线和时变信息进行更新。该模型在独立患者中进行了验证。

结果

我们研究了 1251 名患者中的 1371 例败血症入院。就诊时,53 例(4%)被归类为有风险,1151 例(84%)有有限的器官衰竭,167 例(12%)有多个器官衰竭。在有限器官衰竭的患者中,197 例(17%)发展为多器官衰竭或死亡,809 例(70%)在 14 天内好转或出院。在多器官衰竭的患者中,67 例(40%)死亡,91 例(54%)好转或出院。治疗反应可以合理准确地预测(个体疾病状态的 C 统计量范围为 0.55 至 0.81,总体为 0.67)。验证队列中的模型性能相似。

结论

该预测模型可估计败血症期间疾病严重程度的每日变化,最终可能有助于临床医生做出更明智的治疗决策,并可用于评估预后生物标志物或在试验设计中进行新型败血症治疗的计算机模拟。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01905033。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/927fc0f94f06/13054_2019_2687_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/6de5032d2b7a/13054_2019_2687_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/d4bfc326edaa/13054_2019_2687_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/4456b0ff71c2/13054_2019_2687_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/927fc0f94f06/13054_2019_2687_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/6de5032d2b7a/13054_2019_2687_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/d4bfc326edaa/13054_2019_2687_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/4456b0ff71c2/13054_2019_2687_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e78/6909511/927fc0f94f06/13054_2019_2687_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting the clinical trajectory in critically ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.预测脓毒症危重症患者的临床病程:一项队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 12;23(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2687-z.
2
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
3
A combination of SOFA score and biomarkers gives a better prediction of septic AKI and in-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a pilot study.SOFA 评分与生物标志物联合应用可更好地预测重症外科患者脓毒症急性肾损伤和住院病死率:一项初步研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Sep 10;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0202-5. eCollection 2018.
4
Utility of illness severity scoring for prediction of prolonged surgical critical care.疾病严重程度评分对预测延长的外科重症监护的效用。
J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):513-8; discussion 518-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00002.
5
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.
6
Rifle classification for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill sepsis patients.用于预测重症脓毒症患者院内死亡率的里弗尔分类法
Shock. 2009 Feb;31(2):139-45. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31817d419e.
7
Sepsis and organ system failure are major determinants of post-intensive care unit mortality.脓毒症和器官系统功能衰竭是重症监护病房后死亡率的主要决定因素。
J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
8
Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill patients.可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体作为危重症患者的预后生物标志物
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality.临床医生对重症监护病房死亡率的预测。
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000126402.51524.52.
10
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合,在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面,与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Early detection of ICU-acquired infections using high-frequency electronic health record data.利用高频电子健康记录数据早期检测重症监护病房获得性感染
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03031-6.
2
Forecasting disease trajectories in critical illness: comparison of probabilistic dynamic systems to static models to predict patient status in the intensive care unit.预测危重病患者的疾病轨迹:概率动态系统与静态模型预测重症监护病房患者状态的比较。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e079243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079243.
3
Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction errors for state occupation and transition probabilities in multi-state models.多状态模型中状态占据和转移概率的预测误差。
Biom J. 2018 Jan;60(1):34-48. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600191. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
The attributable mortality of delirium in critically ill patients: prospective cohort study.危重症患者谵妄的归因死亡率:前瞻性队列研究。
基于被动抬腿等液体反应性试验的液体管理能否改善脓毒症的结局?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(5):18-23. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220304202556.
4
Predicting Future Care Requirements Using Machine Learning for Pediatric Intensive and Routine Care Inpatients.使用机器学习预测儿科重症和常规护理住院患者未来的护理需求。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Aug 10;3(8):e0505. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000505. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症管理、流行病学、评分及识别方面的研究重点
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2021 Jul 2;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40635-021-00400-z.
6
Survival prediction of patients with sepsis from age, sex, and septic episode number alone.仅根据年龄、性别和感染发作次数预测脓毒症患者的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 13;10(1):17156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73558-3.
7
Criticality: A New Concept of Severity of Illness for Hospitalized Children.危重度:一种新的住院儿童疾病严重程度概念。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):e33-e43. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002560.
8
Correction to: Predicting the clinical trajectory in critically ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.对《预测脓毒症重症患者的临床病程:一项队列研究》的更正
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 6;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2758-1.
BMJ. 2014 Nov 24;349:g6652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6652.
4
Interobserver agreement of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for classifying infections in critically ill patients.疾病预防控制中心分类标准在重症患者感染分类中的观察者间一致性。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2373-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182923712.
5
Clinical course of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in a cohort of infected patients from ten Colombian hospitals.从哥伦比亚的十家医院感染患者的队列中,观察脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的临床病程。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 24;13:345. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-345.
6
Predisposition, insult/infection, response, and organ dysfunction: A new model for staging severe sepsis.易感性、损伤/感染、反应及器官功能障碍:一种严重脓毒症分期的新模型
Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1329-35. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819d5db1.
7
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.2001年危重病医学会/欧洲重症监护医学学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国胸科学会/危重病医学学会国际脓毒症定义会议。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Apr;29(4):530-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
8
Risk stratification and therapeutic decision making in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征的风险分层与治疗决策
JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):876-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.876.