• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用高频电子健康记录数据早期检测重症监护病房获得性感染

Early detection of ICU-acquired infections using high-frequency electronic health record data.

作者信息

Varkila Meri R J, Lancia Giacomo, van Smeden Maarten, Bonten Marc J M, Spitoni Cristian, Cremer Olaf L

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03031-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-03031-6
PMID:40691575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12278606/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the ICU. Earlier identification of these complications may facilitate better clinical management and improve outcomes. We developed a dynamic prediction model that leveraged high-frequency longitudinal data to estimate infection risk 48 h ahead of clinically overt deterioration.

METHODS

We used electronic health record data from consecutive adults who had been treated for > 48 h in a mixed tertiary ICU in the Netherlands enrolled in the Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis (MARS) cohort from 2011 to 2018. All infectious episodes were prospectively adjudicated. ICU-acquired infection (ICU-AI) risk was estimated using a Cox landmark model with high-resolution vital sign data processed via a convolutional neural network (CNN).

RESULTS

We studied 32,178 observation days in 4444 patients and observed 1197 infections, yielding an overall infection risk of 3.5% per ICU day. Discrimination of the composite model was moderate with c-index values varying between 0.64 (95%CI: 0.58-0.69) and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.66-0.78) across timepoints, with some overestimation of ICU-AI risk overall (mean calibration slope 0.58). Compared to 38 common features of infection, a CNN risk score derived from five vital sign signals consistently ranked as a strong predictor of ICU-AI across all time points but did not substantially change risk prediction of ICU-AI.

CONCLUSION

A dynamic modelling approach that incorporates machine learning of high-frequency vital sign data shows promise as a continuous bedside index of infection risk. Further validation is needed to weigh added complexity and interpretability of the deep learning model against potential benefits for clinical decision support in the ICU.

摘要

背景

医院感染是重症监护病房(ICU)发病和死亡的主要原因。尽早识别这些并发症可能有助于更好的临床管理并改善预后。我们开发了一种动态预测模型,该模型利用高频纵向数据在临床明显恶化前48小时估计感染风险。

方法

我们使用了来自荷兰一家综合性三级ICU连续治疗超过48小时的成年患者的电子健康记录数据,这些患者纳入了2011年至2018年的脓毒症分子诊断和风险分层(MARS)队列。所有感染事件均进行前瞻性判定。使用Cox标志性模型估计ICU获得性感染(ICU-AI)风险,该模型利用通过卷积神经网络(CNN)处理的高分辨率生命体征数据。

结果

我们研究了4444例患者的32178个观察日,观察到1197例感染,ICU每日总体感染风险为3.5%。复合模型的辨别力中等,各时间点的c指数值在0.64(95%CI:0.58-0.69)和0.72(95%CI:0.66-0.78)之间变化,总体上对ICU-AI风险有一些高估(平均校准斜率0.58)。与38个常见感染特征相比,从五个生命体征信号得出的CNN风险评分在所有时间点始终被列为ICU-AI的强预测指标,但并未实质性改变ICU-AI的风险预测。

结论

一种结合高频生命体征数据机器学习的动态建模方法显示出有望作为感染风险的连续床边指标。需要进一步验证,以权衡深度学习模型增加的复杂性和可解释性与对ICU临床决策支持的潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/2a03b72ec914/12911_2025_3031_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/4399088d9623/12911_2025_3031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/976b6e7c7064/12911_2025_3031_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/29c512abf07a/12911_2025_3031_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/2a03b72ec914/12911_2025_3031_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/4399088d9623/12911_2025_3031_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/976b6e7c7064/12911_2025_3031_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/29c512abf07a/12911_2025_3031_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/12278606/2a03b72ec914/12911_2025_3031_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early detection of ICU-acquired infections using high-frequency electronic health record data.利用高频电子健康记录数据早期检测重症监护病房获得性感染
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03031-6.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Two-step interpretable modeling of ICU-AIs.两步可解释 ICU-AI 建模。
Artif Intell Med. 2024 May;151:102862. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102862. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Deployment of machine learning algorithms to predict sepsis: systematic review and application of the SALIENT clinical AI implementation framework.
部署机器学习算法预测脓毒症:SALIENT 临床人工智能实施框架的系统评价与应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1349-1361. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad075.
4
Sepsis biomarkers and diagnostic tools with a focus on machine learning.聚焦于机器学习的脓毒症生物标志物和诊断工具。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104394. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
5
Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis.采用 TREWS 机器学习为基础的脓毒症早期预警系统后,对患者预后的前瞻性、多中心研究。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1455-1460. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods.存在竞争风险时预测模型的验证:现代方法指南
BMJ. 2022 May 24;377:e069249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069249.
7
Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review.脓毒症的生物标志物:不仅仅是发热和白细胞增多——一篇叙述性综述。
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 6;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03862-5.
8
Lessons learnt when accounting for competing events in the external validation of time-to-event prognostic models.在对生存预后模型进行外部验证时考虑竞争事件所得到的经验教训。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 May 9;51(2):615-625. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab256.
9
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients.在住院患者中验证广泛实施的专有脓毒症预测模型的外部有效性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
10
Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习对重症监护病房中的脓毒症进行早期预测:一项系统综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 28;8:607952. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.607952. eCollection 2021.