SCK-CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.
Greek Atomic Energy Commission, EEAE, Agia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020 Jun 12;188(1):22-29. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz253.
Medical staff in interventional procedures are among the professionals with the highest occupational doses. Active personal dosemeters (APDs) can help in optimizing the exposure during interventional procedures. However, there can be problems when using APDs during interventional procedures, due to the specific energy and angular distribution of the radiation field and because of the pulsed nature of the radiation. Many parameters like the type of interventional procedure, personal habits and working techniques, protection tools used and X-ray field characteristics influence the occupational exposure and the scattered radiation around the patient. In this paper, we compare the results from three types of APDs with a passive personal dosimetry system while being used in real clinical environment by the interventional staff. The results show that there is a large spread in the ratios of the passive and active devices.
介入手术中的医务人员属于职业照射剂量最高的群体之一。主动个人剂量计(APD)有助于优化介入手术中的照射。然而,在介入手术中使用 APD 时,由于辐射场的特定能量和角度分布,以及辐射的脉冲性质,可能会出现问题。许多参数,如介入手术的类型、个人习惯和工作技术、使用的防护工具以及 X 射线场特性,都会影响职业照射和患者周围的散射辐射。在本文中,我们比较了三种 APD 与被动个人剂量计系统在介入工作人员实际临床环境中使用时的结果。结果表明,被动和主动设备的比值存在较大差异。