Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University, ul. F. Joliot-Curie 14, 50-383, Wrocław, Poland.
J Mol Model. 2019 Dec 13;26(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00894-019-4268-0.
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy has been proven to be an important technique for studying paramagnetic systems. Probably, the most accessible EPR parameter and the one that provides a significant amount of information about molecular structure and spin density is the hyperfine coupling constant (HFCC). Hence, accurate quantum-chemical modeling of HFCCs is frequently essential to the adequate interpretation of EPR spectra. It requires the precise spin density, which is the difference between the densities of α- and β-electrons, and thus, its quality is expected to reflect the quality of the total electron density. The question of which approximate exchange-correlation density functional yields sufficiently accurate HFCCs, and thus, the spin density remains open. To assess the performance of well-established density functionals for calculating HFCCs, we used a series of 26 small paramagnetic species and compared the obtained results to the CCSD reference values. The performance of DFT was also tested on EPR-studied o-semiquinone radical interacting with water molecules and Mg cation. The HFCCs were additionally calculated by the DLPNO-CCSD method, and this wave function-based technique was found superior to all functionals we tested. Although some functionals were found, on average, to be fairly efficient, we found that the most accurate functional is system-dependent, and therefore, the DLPNO-CCSD method should be preferred for theoretical investigations of the HFCCs and spin density.
电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱已被证明是研究顺磁系统的重要技术。也许,最容易获得的 EPR 参数,也是提供关于分子结构和自旋密度的大量信息的参数是超精细耦合常数(HFCC)。因此,HFCC 的精确量子化学建模通常对于充分解释 EPR 光谱是必不可少的。它需要精确的自旋密度,即α-和β-电子密度之间的差异,因此,其质量有望反映总电子密度的质量。哪种近似交换相关密度泛函能够产生足够准确的 HFCC,从而产生自旋密度的问题仍然没有答案。为了评估用于计算 HFCC 的成熟密度泛函的性能,我们使用了一系列 26 种小顺磁体,并将获得的结果与 CCSD 参考值进行了比较。DFT 的性能也在与水分子和 Mg 阳离子相互作用的 EPR 研究的 o-半醌自由基上进行了测试。HFCC 还通过 DLPNO-CCSD 方法进行了计算,并且发现这种基于波函数的技术优于我们测试的所有功能。尽管发现某些功能平均来说相当有效,但我们发现最准确的功能是依赖于系统的,因此,对于 HFCC 和自旋密度的理论研究,应优先使用 DLPNO-CCSD 方法。