Jonmarker Olof, Strand Fredrik, Brandberg Yvonne, Lindholm Peter
Department of Functional Imaging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Radiol Open. 2019 Dec 4;8(12):2058460119880315. doi: 10.1177/2058460119880315. eCollection 2019 Dec.
If screening participants do not trust computerized decision-making, screening participation may be affected by the introduction of such methods.
To survey breast cancer screening participants' attitudes towards potential future uses of computerization.
A survey was constructed. Women in a breast cancer screening program were invited via the final report letter to participate. Data were collected from February 2018 to March 2019 and 2196 surveys were completed. Questions asked participants to rate propositions using Likert scales. Data analysis was done using χ and logistic regression tests.
The mean age of participants was 61 years. Response rate was 1.3%. Of the submitted surveys, 97.5% were complete; 38% of respondents reported a preference for a computer-only examination. The highest level of confidence was given a computer-only reading followed by a physician reading. Participants with > 12 years of education were more likely to prefer a computer-only reading (odds ratio [OR] 1.655, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.168-2.344), had a greater trust in letting a computer determine screening intervals and the need for a supplemental MRI (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.171-2.202 and OR 1.577, 95% CI 1.107-2.247, respectively). Age was not found to be a significant predictor.
A high level of trust in computerized decision-making was expressed. Higher age was associated with a lower understanding of technology but did not affect attitudes to computerized decision-making. A lower level of education was associated with a lower trust in computerization. This may be valuable knowledge for future studies.
如果筛查参与者不信任计算机化决策,那么引入此类方法可能会影响筛查参与率。
调查乳腺癌筛查参与者对计算机化未来潜在用途的态度。
设计了一项调查问卷。通过最终报告信邀请乳腺癌筛查项目中的女性参与。于2018年2月至2019年3月收集数据,共完成2196份调查问卷。问题要求参与者使用李克特量表对各项提议进行评分。采用χ检验和逻辑回归检验进行数据分析。
参与者的平均年龄为61岁。回复率为1.3%。在提交的调查问卷中,97.5%为完整问卷;38%的受访者表示更倾向于仅由计算机进行检查。对仅由计算机解读的信任度最高,其次是医生解读。受教育年限超过12年的参与者更倾向于仅由计算机解读(优势比[OR]为1.655,95%置信区间[CI]为1.168 - 2.344),对让计算机确定筛查间隔和补充MRI必要性的信任度更高(分别为OR 1.606,95% CI 1.171 - 2.202和OR 1.577,95% CI 1.107 - 2.247)。未发现年龄是显著的预测因素。
参与者对计算机化决策表达了高度信任。年龄越大对技术的理解越低,但不影响对计算机化决策的态度。教育程度较低与对计算机化的信任度较低相关。这可能对未来的研究具有重要价值。