• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography: a simulation study.使用人工智能和合成乳腺摄影术降低数字乳腺断层合成筛查的工作量:一项模拟研究。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Nov;12(Suppl 2):S22005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Investigating the effect of adding comparisons with prior mammograms to standalone digital breast tomosynthesis screening.研究在独立数字乳腺断层合成筛查中添加与既往乳房X光检查结果对比的效果。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Nov;12(Suppl 2):S22003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22003. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
3
Comparing synthetic mammograms based on wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammograms.基于广角数字乳腺断层合成技术的合成乳腺钼靶图像与数字乳腺钼靶图像的比较。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13011. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13011. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
Automated assessment of task-based performance of digital mammography and tomosynthesis systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom and deep learning-based scoring.使用拟人化乳房模型和基于深度学习的评分对数字乳腺摄影和断层合成系统的基于任务的性能进行自动评估。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13005. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.断层合成二维乳腺 X 线摄影与单纯数字乳腺 X 线摄影相比,在致密型乳腺和年轻女性中能提高癌症检出率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jul;152:110324. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110324. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
7
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Breast cancer screening using synthesized two-dimensional mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于合成二维乳房 X 光摄影术的乳腺癌筛查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2021 Oct;59:270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.016. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing synthetic mammograms based on wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammograms.基于广角数字乳腺断层合成技术的合成乳腺钼靶图像与数字乳腺钼靶图像的比较。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13011. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13011. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
Role of Ethics in Developing AI-Based Applications in Medicine: Insights From Expert Interviews and Discussion of Implications.伦理在医学领域基于人工智能的应用开发中的作用:来自专家访谈的见解及影响探讨。
JMIR AI. 2024 Jan 12;3:e51204. doi: 10.2196/51204.
3
How long does it take to read a mammogram? Investigating the reading time of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.读一张乳腺 X 光片需要多长时间?研究数字乳腺断层合成和数字乳腺 X 光摄影的阅读时间。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Aug;177:111535. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111535. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.瑞典筛查性乳腺钼靶摄影中用于乳腺癌检测的人工智能:一项前瞻性、基于人群、配对读者、非劣效性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e703-e711. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00153-X. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
5
Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening.澳大利亚女性对在乳腺癌筛查中使用人工智能读取乳房X光片的看法。
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 7;9:20552076231191057. doi: 10.1177/20552076231191057. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.人工智能支持的屏幕阅读与人工智能筛查中的标准双读(MASAI)试验:一项随机、对照、非劣效、单盲、筛查准确性研究的临床安全性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Aug;24(8):936-944. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00298-X.
7
Personalized breast cancer screening with selective addition of digital breast tomosynthesis through artificial intelligence.通过人工智能选择性添加数字乳腺断层合成技术进行个性化乳腺癌筛查。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 2):S22408. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S2.S22408. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
8
Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.数字乳腺断层合成筛查乳腺癌:不同人工智能阅读策略的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3754-3765. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09316-y. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
9
Women's perceptions and attitudes to the use of AI in breast cancer screening: a survey in a cancer referral centre.女性对人工智能在乳腺癌筛查中应用的认知和态度:癌症转诊中心的一项调查。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jan 1;96(1141):20220569. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220569. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.人工智能计算机辅助检测合成钼靶图像与数字钼靶图像在虚拟筛查环境中单独使用和与断层合成图像联合使用的比较。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Jan;41(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01327-5. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

使用人工智能和合成乳腺摄影术降低数字乳腺断层合成筛查的工作量:一项模拟研究。

Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography: a simulation study.

作者信息

Dahlblom Victor, Dustler Magnus, Zackrisson Sophia, Tingberg Anders

机构信息

Lund University, Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Malmö, Sweden.

Skåne University Hospital, Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Nov;12(Suppl 2):S22005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22005
PMID:40313361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12042222/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To achieve the high sensitivity of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a time-consuming reading is necessary. However, synthetic mammography (SM) images, equivalent to digital mammography (DM), can be generated from DBT images. SM is faster to read and might be sufficient in many cases. We investigate using artificial intelligence (AI) to stratify examinations into reading of either SM or DBT to minimize workload and maximize accuracy.

APPROACH

This is a retrospective study based on double-read paired DM and one-view DBT from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. DBT examinations were analyzed with the cancer detection AI system ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7. For low-risk examinations, SM reading was simulated by assuming equality with DM reading. For high-risk examinations, the DBT reading results were used. Different combinations of single and double reading were studied.

RESULTS

By double-reading the DBT of 30% (4452/14,772) of the cases with the highest risk, and single-reading SM for the rest, 122 cancers would be detected with the same reading workload as DM double reading. That is 28% (27/95) more cancers would be detected than with DM double reading, and in total, 96% (122/127) of the cancers detectable with full DBT double reading would be found.

CONCLUSIONS

In a DBT-based screening program, AI could be used to select high-risk cases where the reading of DBT is valuable, whereas SM is sufficient for low-risk cases. Substantially, more cancers could be detected compared with DM only, with only a limited increase in reading workload. Prospective studies are necessary.

摘要

目的

为实现数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)的高灵敏度,需要进行耗时的阅片。然而,可以从DBT图像生成等同于数字乳腺摄影(DM)的合成乳腺摄影(SM)图像。SM阅片速度更快,在许多情况下可能就足够了。我们研究使用人工智能(AI)将检查分层为SM或DBT阅片,以最小化工作量并最大化准确性。

方法

这是一项基于马尔默乳腺断层合成筛查试验中双读配对DM和单视图DBT的回顾性研究。使用癌症检测AI系统ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7分析DBT检查。对于低风险检查,通过假设与DM阅片相同来模拟SM阅片。对于高风险检查,则使用DBT阅片结果。研究了单读和双读的不同组合。

结果

通过对30%(4452/14772)风险最高的病例进行DBT双读,其余病例进行SM单读,在与DM双读相同的阅片工作量下可检测到122例癌症。这比DM双读多检测到28%(27/95)的癌症,并且总共可发现全DBT双读可检测到的癌症的96%(122/127)。

结论

在基于DBT的筛查项目中,AI可用于选择DBT阅片有价值的高风险病例,而SM对于低风险病例就足够了。与仅使用DM相比,可检测到更多癌症,且阅片工作量仅有限增加。有必要进行前瞻性研究。