• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008-2017 年,纽约市校医院提供避孕措施对青少年怀孕率和避免成本的影响。

Provision of Contraception in New York City School-Based Health Centers: Impact on Teenage Pregnancy and Avoided Costs, 2008-2017.

机构信息

The Office of School Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York.

Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College, The City University of New York, New York.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;51(4):201-209. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12126.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12126
PMID:31840909
Abstract

CONTEXT

Since 2008, the School-Based Health Center Reproductive Health Project (SBHC RHP) has supported SBHCs in New York City (NYC) to increase the availability of effective contraception; however, its impact on teenage pregnancy and avoided costs has not been estimated.

METHODS

The impact of the SBHC RHP on patterns of contraceptive use and on the numbers of pregnancies, abortions and births averted in 2008-2017 was estimated using program data and public data from the NYC Bureau of Vital Statistics and Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Data from the Guttmacher Institute on the cost of publicly funded births and abortions were used to estimate costs avoided; NYC-specific teenage pregnancy outcome data were employed to estimate the proportion of overall declines attributable to the SBHC RHP.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, the SBHC RHP supported a substantial increase in the proportion of sexually active female clients using effective contraceptives. Most dramatically, 14% of clients in the SBHC RHP method mix used LARCs in 2017, compared with 2% in the non-SBHC RHP mix. The project averted an estimated 5,376 pregnancies, 2,104 births and 3,085 abortions, leading to an estimated $30,360,352 in avoided one-time costs of publicly funded births and abortions. These averted events accounted for 26-28% of the decline in teenage pregnancies, births and abortions in NYC.

CONCLUSIONS

When comprehensive reproductive health services are available in SBHCs, teenagers use them, resulting in substantially fewer pregnancies, abortions and births, and lower costs to public health systems.

摘要

背景

自 2008 年以来,学校健康中心生殖健康项目(SBHC RHP)一直支持纽约市(NYC)的 SBHC 增加有效避孕措施的可及性;然而,其对青少年怀孕和避免成本的影响尚未估计。

方法

使用项目数据和纽约市生命统计局和青年风险行为调查的公共数据,估计 SBHC RHP 对 2008-2017 年避孕措施使用模式以及避免的怀孕、堕胎和生育数量的影响。使用盖特马赫研究所关于公共资助生育和堕胎成本的数据来估计避免的成本;使用纽约市特有的青少年怀孕结果数据来估计归因于 SBHC RHP 的总体下降比例。

结果

在 2008 年至 2017 年期间,SBHC RHP 支持性行为活跃的女性客户使用有效避孕措施的比例大幅增加。最引人注目的是,2017 年 SBHC RHP 方法组合中 14%的客户使用了长效可逆避孕方法(LARCs),而在非 SBHC RHP 方法组合中这一比例仅为 2%。该项目避免了估计 5376 例怀孕、2104 例分娩和 3085 例堕胎,避免了公共资助生育和堕胎的一次性费用估计为 30360352 美元。这些避免的事件占纽约市青少年怀孕、分娩和堕胎下降的 26-28%。

结论

当 SBHC 提供全面的生殖健康服务时,青少年会使用这些服务,从而导致怀孕、堕胎和分娩的数量大幅减少,公共卫生系统的成本降低。

相似文献

1
Provision of Contraception in New York City School-Based Health Centers: Impact on Teenage Pregnancy and Avoided Costs, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年,纽约市校医院提供避孕措施对青少年怀孕率和避免成本的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;51(4):201-209. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12126.
2
Australian teenagers and pregnancy.澳大利亚青少年与怀孕。
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1984 Autumn;1:31-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03029374.
3
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
4
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.投资回报率:对美国公共资助计划生育项目的效益和成本节约情况进行更全面的评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):696-749. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12080. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
5
Integrating Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Services into New York City School-Based Health Centers: Quality Improvement to Ensure Provision of Youth-Friendly Services.将长效可逆避孕服务纳入纽约市学校健康中心:改进质量以确保提供适合青少年的服务。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Jun;30(3):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Unmet Need for Family Planning and Experience of Unintended Pregnancy Among Female Sex Workers in Urban Cameroon: Results From a National Cross-Sectional Study.喀麦隆城市地区女性性工作者的计划生育未满足需求和意外怀孕经历:一项全国性横断面研究的结果。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):82-99. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00330. Print 2020 Mar 30.
7
Pregnancies averted among U.S. teenagers by the use of contraceptives.美国青少年使用避孕药具避免怀孕的情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jan-Feb;31(1):29-34.
8
Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.提供免费长效避孕措施与青少年怀孕问题
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 2;371(14):1316-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400506.
9
The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.避孕措施改善对西方国家生育率和堕胎率的潜在影响。
Eur J Popul. 1987 Nov;3(1):7-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01797090.
10
Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.1 年内紧急避孕方案的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):508.e1-508.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond policy: perspectives of school health practitioners about providing contraception services to school-going adolescents in South Africa.超越政策:南非学校健康从业者对为在校青少年提供避孕服务的看法。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Nov 28;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00320-9.
2
When a school is more than just a school: Improving school-based health in the wake of COVID-19.当学校不仅仅是学校时:在新冠疫情后改善基于学校的健康状况。
World Med Health Policy. 2022 Mar;14(1):150-177. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.498. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
A comparison of contraceptive services for adolescents at school-based versus community health centers in Oregon.
俄勒冈州校办卫生中心与社区卫生中心提供的青少年避孕服务比较。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):145-151. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13889. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Provider Comfort with Prescribing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Adolescents.提供者对为青少年开具 HIV 暴露前预防药物的舒适度。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2021 Oct;35(10):411-417. doi: 10.1089/apc.2021.0045.
5
Joining the herd? U.S. public opinion and vaccination requirements across educational settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.加入群体?美国公众意见和 COVID-19 大流行期间教育环境中的疫苗接种要求。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2375-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
What will it take? Using an implementation research framework to identify facilitators and barriers in implementing a school-based referral system for sexual health services.需要什么?利用实施研究框架确定在学校实施性健康服务转介系统的促进因素和障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05147-z.