School of Public Policy, The Pennsylvania State University, 329 Pond Lab, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2375-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
With effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines beginning to be distributed across the United States, questions about who should receive the vaccine first have been the focus of public discussions. Yet, over the long-term, questions about the order of distribution will be displaced by questions about how to achieve high levels of vaccination rates. Historically, absent incentives or mandates, Americans have shown ambivalence, if not general antipathy, towards vaccinations, and vaccination rates have generally been low for many vaccines. There is evidence that vaccination requirements across educational settings are an effective policy instrument to increase vaccination rates. We administered a large national survey to assess American's attitudes towards vaccination requirements across three educational settings (daycare, K-12 schools, and universities) in general and for COVID-19 specifically. Partisanship, gender, race, rurality, and perceptions about the appropriate role schools should play in providing health services are substantive predictors of public opinion. While Americans generally support vaccination mandates across all three settings for both types of requirements, support is consistently and significantly lower for COVID19 requirements. The effect of partisanship is accentuated for COVID-19 requirements as compared to general requirements. Drop off in support between general and COVID-19 specific requirements are driven by partisanship, gender, political knowledge, rurality, and having children in the household. Nonetheless, mandates are supported by a majority of Americans. Assessing Americans' opinions of vaccination requirements in educational settings offers an important opportunity to explore the potential of mandates as policy instrument in the government's arsenal against COVID-19 and guide public policy on the issues.
随着有效且安全的 COVID-19 疫苗开始在美国各地分发,关于谁应该首先接种疫苗的问题成为了公众讨论的焦点。然而,从长期来看,关于分配顺序的问题将被如何实现高疫苗接种率的问题所取代。从历史上看,如果没有激励措施或强制要求,美国人对疫苗接种一直持矛盾态度,如果不是普遍反感的话,而且许多疫苗的接种率通常都很低。有证据表明,在教育机构中实施疫苗接种要求是提高疫苗接种率的有效政策手段。我们进行了一项大型全国性调查,以评估美国人对三个教育环境(日托、K-12 学校和大学)普遍以及对 COVID-19 特定的疫苗接种要求的态度。党派、性别、种族、农村和对学校在提供卫生服务方面应发挥的适当作用的看法是公众意见的实质性预测因素。尽管美国人普遍支持在所有三个环境中对这两种类型的要求实施疫苗接种授权,但对 COVID19 要求的支持率始终明显较低。与一般要求相比,党派的影响在 COVID-19 要求中更为突出。在一般要求和 COVID-19 特定要求之间支持率下降的原因是党派、性别、政治知识、农村和家庭中有孩子。尽管如此,大多数美国人还是支持授权。评估美国人对教育环境中疫苗接种要求的看法为探索授权作为政府对抗 COVID-19 的政策手段的潜力提供了一个重要机会,并为这些问题的公共政策提供了指导。