• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织整群抽样调查方法评估扩大免疫规划对目标疾病发病率的影响。

The use of the WHO cluster survey method for evaluating the impact of the expanded programme on immunization on target disease incidence.

作者信息

Cutts F T

机构信息

Save the Children Fund Epidemiologist, E.P.I., Ministry of Health, Mozambique.

出版信息

J Trop Med Hyg. 1988 Oct;91(5):231-9.

PMID:3184243
Abstract

A study was performed in Quelimane City, Mozambique, using the WHO EPI cluster sampling methodology to assess its applicability for evaluating the impact of the programme on target disease incidence rates in urban areas. Though the methodology was straightforward to use, difficulties were experienced in the retrospective diagnosis of the target diseases, which were felt to limit the reliability of the data obtained. Though results of measles incidence and mortality rates were useful to compare with routine data and discuss with local health staff, the variation in measles incidence rates between epidemic and non-epidemic years may make repeated surveys of this type inappropriate for evaluating programme impact, as it would be difficult to attribute any reduction found in one particular year to immunization and not to the variation in disease incidence which is known to occur in the absence of vaccination. It is suggested that resources would be more profitably used in establishing sentinel sites and improving the quality and utilization of routine data than in conducting repeated sample surveys.

摘要

在莫桑比克的克利马内市开展了一项研究,采用世界卫生组织扩大免疫规划(EPI)整群抽样方法来评估其在评估该规划对城市地区目标疾病发病率的影响方面的适用性。尽管该方法易于使用,但在目标疾病的回顾性诊断中遇到了困难,这被认为限制了所获数据的可靠性。虽然麻疹发病率和死亡率的结果对于与常规数据进行比较以及与当地卫生工作人员进行讨论很有用,但流行年份和非流行年份之间麻疹发病率的差异可能使得此类重复调查不适用于评估规划影响,因为很难将某一特定年份中发现的任何降低归因于免疫接种,而不是归因于在未接种疫苗情况下已知会出现的疾病发病率变化。建议将资源更有效地用于建立哨点以及提高常规数据的质量和利用率,而不是进行重复抽样调查。

相似文献

1
The use of the WHO cluster survey method for evaluating the impact of the expanded programme on immunization on target disease incidence.使用世界卫生组织整群抽样调查方法评估扩大免疫规划对目标疾病发病率的影响。
J Trop Med Hyg. 1988 Oct;91(5):231-9.
2
Rehabilitation of the expanded programme on immunization in Sudan following a poliomyelitis outbreak.苏丹脊髓灰质炎疫情后扩大免疫规划的恢复工作。
Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(4):335-41.
3
The use of evaluation to improve the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Mozambique.利用评估来改进莫桑比克的扩大免疫规划。
Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68(2):199-208.
4
Local area monitoring (LAM).局部区域监测(LAM)。
World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(1):19-25.
5
The EPI in Borno State, Nigeria: impact on routine disease notifications and hospital admissions.尼日利亚博尔诺州的扩大免疫规划:对常规疾病报告和住院情况的影响。
J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Dec;95(6):373-81.
6
[Morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases determined mass vaccination in children under 5 ans in Bamako District].[巴马科地区5岁以下儿童传染病的发病率和死亡率决定了大规模疫苗接种]
Mali Med. 2006;21(4):8-11.
7
Observations on the application of EPI cluster survey methods for estimating disease incidence.关于应用扩大免疫规划(EPI)整群抽样调查方法估计疾病发病率的观察
Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(1):93-9.
8
Surveillance for the Expanded Programme on Immunization.扩大免疫规划监测
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):633-9.
9
Community-based evaluation survey of immunizations in Burkina Faso.布基纳法索基于社区的免疫接种评估调查。
Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(5):583-90.
10
Evaluation of immunization coverage by lot quality assurance sampling compared with 30-cluster sampling in a primary health centre in India.在印度一家初级卫生中心,采用批量质量保证抽样法与30群组抽样法对免疫接种覆盖率进行评估。
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(3):269-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the vaccination coverage: validity of household-hold vaccination booklet and caregiver's recall.评估疫苗接种覆盖率:家庭疫苗接种本和照顾者回忆的有效性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):3034-3041. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1906151. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Analyzing the Urban-Rural Vaccination Coverage Disparity through a Fair Decomposition in Zhejiang Province, China.通过在中国浙江省的公平分解分析城乡疫苗接种覆盖率差距。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 19;16(22):4575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224575.
3
Validity of Maternal Recall to Assess Vaccination Coverage: Evidence from Six Districts in Zhejiang Province, China.
母体回忆法评估疫苗接种率的有效性:来自中国浙江省六个地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 18;16(6):957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060957.
4
Reliability and validity of a survey to identify vaccine hesitancy among parents in Changxing county, Zhejiang province.浙江省长兴县父母疫苗犹豫调查的信度和效度。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1092-1099. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1572409. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
Measles vaccination coverage, determinants of delayed vaccination and reasons for non-vaccination among children aged 24-35 months in Zhejiang province, China.中国浙江省 24-35 月龄儿童麻疹疫苗接种率、延迟接种的决定因素和未接种疫苗的原因。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):1298. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6226-7.
6
Inequities in Childhood Vaccination Coverage in Zhejiang, Province: Evidence from a Decomposition Analysis on Two-Round Surveys.浙江省儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的不平等:两轮调查分解分析的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 13;15(9):2000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092000.
7
An Overview of Coverage of BCG Vaccination and Its Determinants Based on Data from the Coverage Survey in Zhejiang Province.浙江省覆盖情况调查中卡介苗接种覆盖率及其决定因素概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061155.
8
Timeliness of Childhood Primary Immunization and Risk Factors Related with Delays: Evidence from the 2014 Zhejiang Provincial Vaccination Coverage Survey.儿童期初次免疫接种的及时性及与延迟相关的风险因素:来自2014年浙江省疫苗接种覆盖率调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 20;14(9):1086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091086.
9
The use of evaluation to improve the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Mozambique.利用评估来改进莫桑比克的扩大免疫规划。
Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68(2):199-208.
10
Community-based evaluation survey of immunizations in Burkina Faso.布基纳法索基于社区的免疫接种评估调查。
Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(5):583-90.