Visser E Kathalijne, Kuypers Monique M F, Stam Jennifer S M, Riedstra Bernd
Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 374, 9250 AJ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Behavioural Biology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 12;9(12):1131. doi: 10.3390/ani9121131.
Understanding equestrians' noseband tightening practices and intentions is necessary to target welfare improvement strategies. Firstly, we measured tightness in dressage and show jumping horses in The Netherlands, shortly after implementation of the two-finger rule by the Royal Dutch Equestrian Federation. Noseband tightness decreased with age, was less tight in dressage horses than in show jumpers, and was dependent on the interaction between competition level and discipline. Fifty-nine percent of the riders tightened nosebands to such an extent that they adhered to the new regulation. Secondly, we conducted an online survey to gain insight into whether riders were aware of noseband use and tightening behaviour. Of the 386 respondents, 54.5% agreed with the new regulations, and 62% believe that it improves horses' welfare. Applying cluster analysis to statements regarding their own attitude, peer pressure, and behavioural control produced three clusters. Noticeably, a lower percentage of Cluster 1 respondents (38%) performing at higher levels was convinced that the new regulation improved welfare than Cluster 2 (77.9%) and 3 (89.0%) respondents. Designing strategies to ensure the successful implementation of the new regulation and to convince equestrians to comply would be most effective if targeted differentially, and should include a transparent and objective form of regulation.
了解马术运动员收紧鼻带的做法和意图对于制定改善福利的策略至关重要。首先,在荷兰皇家马术联合会实施两指规则后不久,我们测量了盛装舞步和场地障碍赛马匹的鼻带松紧度。鼻带松紧度随年龄增长而降低,盛装舞步马的鼻带比场地障碍赛马的鼻带松,且取决于比赛水平和项目之间的相互作用。59%的骑手将鼻带收紧到符合新规定的程度。其次,我们进行了一项在线调查,以了解骑手是否了解鼻带的使用和收紧行为。在386名受访者中,54.5%的人同意新规定,62%的人认为这改善了马匹的福利。对关于他们自己的态度、同伴压力和行为控制的陈述进行聚类分析,产生了三个类别。值得注意的是,与第2类(77.9%)和第3类(89.0%)受访者相比,在较高水平比赛的第1类受访者中,认为新规定改善了福利的比例较低(38%)。如果有针对性地制定策略,确保新规定的成功实施并说服马术运动员遵守,将是最有效的,并且应该包括一种透明和客观的监管形式。