Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett St, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
University of Liverpool Department of Public Health and Policy, 3rd Floor, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7895-6.
The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions.
Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented.
The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations.
The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review.
Protocol for umbrella review prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42017068357.
健康的社会决定因素已得到广泛认可,但对于构成健康的宏观经济决定因素以及可以采取哪些措施来解决这些因素,仍缺乏明确性。本研究对系统评价进行了伞式评价,以确定人口层面的宏观经济因素、策略、政策和干预措施对健康和健康不平等的影响的证据。
使用新的概念框架,在九个数据库中搜索符合效果摘要数据库(Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects,DARE)标准的系统评价。使用标准化工具评估研究质量,并对研究结果进行叙述性综述。
本研究发现了一个较大(n=62)但质量较低的系统评价证据基础。结果表明,促进就业和改善工作条件的行动有助于改善健康状况并减少基于性别的健康不平等。有证据表明,对烟草、酒精和食品进行市场监管可能有助于改善健康状况并减少健康不平等,包括对这些产品的高税收、限制广告和供应。公用事业和酒精行业的私有化、收入不平等和经济危机可能会增加健康不平等。中左派政府和福利国家慷慨程度可能对健康有积极影响,但特定福利干预措施的证据参差不齐。贸易和贸易政策的影响好坏参半。没有关于货币政策或中央银行和监管组织等大型经济机构对健康影响的系统评价。
本研究结果提供了一个简单而全面的框架,以支持决策者和从业者解决健康的宏观经济决定因素。还需要在低收入和中等收入国家开展进一步研究,并开展进一步的评价,以总结本评价确定的关键空白领域的证据。
本伞式评价的方案前瞻性地在 PROSPERO CRD42017068357 中注册。