• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草控制政策对围产期和儿童健康的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Faber Timor, Kumar Arun, Mackenbach Johan P, Millett Christopher, Basu Sanjay, Sheikh Aziz, Been Jasper V

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;2(9):e420-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5. eCollection 2017 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5
PMID:28944313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5592249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking and smoke exposure during pregnancy and childhood cause considerable childhood morbidity and mortality. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether implementation of WHO's recommended tobacco control policies (MPOWER) was of benefit to perinatal and child health.

METHODS

We searched 19 electronic databases, hand-searched references and citations, and consulted experts to identify studies assessing the association between implementation of MPOWER policies and child health. We did not apply any language restrictions, and searched the full time period available for each database, up to June 22, 2017. Our primary outcomes of interest were perinatal mortality, preterm birth, hospital attendance for asthma exacerbations, and hospital attendance for respiratory tract infections. Where possible and appropriate, we combined data from different studies in random-effects meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015023448.

FINDINGS

We identified 41 eligible studies (24 from North America, 16 from Europe, and one from China) that assessed combinations of the following MPOWER policies: smoke-free legislation (n=35), tobacco taxation (n=11), and smoking cessation services (n=3). Risk of bias was low in 23 studies, moderate in 16, and high in two. Implementation of smoke-free legislation was associated with reductions in rates of preterm birth (-3·77% [95% CI -6·37 to -1·16]; ten studies, 27 530 183 individuals), rates of hospital attendance for asthma exacerbations (-9·83% [-16·62 to -3·04]; five studies, 684 826 events), and rates of hospital attendance for all respiratory tract infections (-3·45% [-4·64 to -2·25]; two studies, 1 681 020 events) and for lower respiratory tract infections (-18·48% [-32·79 to -4·17]; three studies, 887 414 events). Associations appeared to be stronger when comprehensive smoke-free laws were implemented than when partial smoke-free laws were implemented. Among two studies assessing the association between smoke-free legislation and perinatal mortality, one showed significant reductions in stillbirth and neonatal mortality but did not report the overall effect on perinatal mortality, while the other showed no change in perinatal mortality. Meta-analysis of studies on other MPOWER policies was not possible; all four studies on increasing tobacco taxation and one of two on offering disadvantaged pregnant women help to quit smoking that reported on our primary outcomes had positive findings. Assessment of publication bias was only possible for studies assessing the association between smoke-free legislation and preterm birth, showing some degree of bias.

INTERPRETATION

Smoke-free legislation is associated with substantial benefits to child health. The majority of studies on other MPOWER policies also indicated a positive effect. These findings provide strong support for implementation of such policies comprehensively across the world.

FUNDING

Chief Scientist Office Scotland, Farr Institute, Netherlands Lung Foundation, Erasmus MC.

摘要

背景

孕期和儿童期吸烟及接触烟雾会导致儿童出现相当高的发病率和死亡率。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以调查世界卫生组织推荐的烟草控制政策(MPOWER)的实施是否对围产期和儿童健康有益。

方法

我们检索了19个电子数据库,手工检索参考文献和引文,并咨询专家以识别评估MPOWER政策实施与儿童健康之间关联的研究。我们未设置任何语言限制,并检索了每个数据库截至2017年6月22日的全部可用时间段。我们感兴趣的主要结局是围产期死亡率、早产、因哮喘加重而住院、因呼吸道感染而住院。在可能且合适的情况下,我们将不同研究的数据合并进行随机效应荟萃分析。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42015023448。

结果

我们确定了41项符合条件的研究(24项来自北美,16项来自欧洲,1项来自中国),这些研究评估了以下MPOWER政策的组合:无烟立法(n = 35)、烟草税(n = 11)和戒烟服务(n = 3)。23项研究的偏倚风险低,16项为中度,2项为高。实施无烟立法与早产率降低相关(-3.77% [95%CI -6.37至-1.16];10项研究,27530183人)、因哮喘加重而住院率降低(-9.83% [-16.62至-3.04];5项研究,684826例)、因所有呼吸道感染而住院率降低(-3.45% [-4.64至-2.25];2项研究,1681020例)以及因下呼吸道感染而住院率降低(-18.48% [-32.79至-4.17];3项研究,887414例)。实施全面无烟法律时的关联似乎比实施部分无烟法律时更强。在两项评估无烟立法与围产期死亡率之间关联的研究中,一项显示死产和新生儿死亡率显著降低,但未报告对围产期死亡率的总体影响,而另一项显示围产期死亡率无变化。对其他MPOWER政策的研究进行荟萃分析是不可能的;所有四项关于提高烟草税的研究以及两项关于为弱势孕妇提供戒烟帮助的研究中报告我们主要结局的一项有阳性结果。仅对评估无烟立法与早产之间关联的研究进行了发表偏倚评估,显示存在一定程度的偏倚。

解读

无烟立法对儿童健康有显著益处。大多数关于其他MPOWER政策的研究也表明有积极效果。这些发现为在全球全面实施此类政策提供了有力支持。

资金来源

苏格兰首席科学家办公室、法尔研究所、荷兰肺部基金会、伊拉斯姆斯医学中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/e69cfcbf2aa2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/5cf04bf6353c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/fd122d037a26/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/e69cfcbf2aa2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/5cf04bf6353c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/fd122d037a26/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2845/5592249/e69cfcbf2aa2/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.烟草控制政策对围产期和儿童健康的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;2(9):e420-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Tobacco control policies and perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.烟草控制政策与围产期及儿童健康:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 22;5(9):e008398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008398.
3
Effect of smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and private places on children's tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无烟政策对儿童接触烟草烟雾和呼吸道健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):e566-e578. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00097-9. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无烟立法对围产儿和儿童健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2014 May 3;383(9928):1549-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60082-9. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
6
Impact of expanding smoke-free policies beyond enclosed public places and workplaces on children's tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.超越封闭公共场所和工作场所的禁烟政策对儿童接触烟草烟雾和呼吸道健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e038234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038234.
7
The impact of smoke-free legislation on fetal, infant and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.无烟立法对胎儿、婴儿和儿童健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 13;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002261. Print 2013.
8
Evaluation of Population-Level Tobacco Control Interventions and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人群层面烟草控制干预措施和健康结果评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322341. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22341.
9
Smoke-free legislation and child health.无烟立法与儿童健康。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 17;26:16067. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.67.
10
Investigating the effect of England's smoke-free private vehicle regulation on changes in tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory disease in children: a quasi-experimental study.调查英格兰无烟私人车辆法规对儿童烟草烟雾暴露和呼吸道疾病变化的影响:一项准实验研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Dec;4(12):e607-e617. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30175-6. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Second hand smoke attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990 - 2021年204个国家和地区二手烟所致疾病负担:全球疾病负担研究2021的系统分析
Respir Res. 2025 May 7;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03228-3.
2
The association of COVID-19 lockdowns with adverse birth and pregnancy outcomes in 28 high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.28个高收入国家中新冠疫情封锁措施与不良出生及妊娠结局的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02139-z.
3
Discourses on smoke-free policies on Dutch Twitter: A social network analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study.实施世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的主要减少需求措施与 126 个国家吸烟率的变化:一项关联研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e166-e174. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30045-2. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
A missing voice: the human rights of children to a tobacco-free environment.一个被忽视的声音:儿童享有无烟环境的人权
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):3-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053657. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Smoke-Free Legislation in Spain and Prematurity.
荷兰推特上关于无烟政策的讨论:一项社会网络分析
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 14;11:20552076251325583. doi: 10.1177/20552076251325583. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Smoke-free hospitality environments and cognitive health: A population-based study in the United States.无烟酒店环境与认知健康:一项基于美国人群的研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jan 3;50:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102961. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
High Prevalence of Tobacco Consumption among Pregnant Women in a Southern European City (Seville): A Challenge for the Health System.南欧城市(塞维利亚)孕妇中烟草消费的高流行率:对卫生系统的一项挑战
Toxics. 2024 Oct 9;12(10):728. doi: 10.3390/toxics12100728.
6
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
7
Changes in Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in India: A Secondary Analysis of GATS Survey (2009-2017).印度儿童二手烟暴露流行率的变化:GATS 调查(2009-2017)的二次分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):3087-3096. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3087.
8
Asthma Inception: Epidemiologic Risk Factors and Natural History Across the Life Course.哮喘起始:全生命周期的流行病学风险因素和自然史。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 15;210(6):737-754. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2249SO.
9
Tobacco control policies and respiratory conditions among children presenting in primary care.在初级保健中,烟草控制政策与儿童呼吸状况。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 May 16;34(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00369-8.
10
Prevalence and factors associated with second hand smoke exposure among a sample of pregnant women in Cairo, Egypt.埃及开罗孕妇二手烟暴露的流行情况及其影响因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02821-2.
西班牙的无烟立法与早产
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2068. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
Changes in hospitalizations for chronic respiratory diseases after two successive smoking bans in Spain.西班牙连续两次实施禁烟令后慢性呼吸道疾病住院情况的变化
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0177979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177979. eCollection 2017.
5
Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990-2015 年 195 个国家和地区的吸烟流行率和可归因疾病负担:来自 2015 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1885-1906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30819-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Evaluation of a complex healthcare intervention to increase smoking cessation in pregnant women: interrupted time series analysis with economic evaluation.评估一项旨在增加孕妇戒烟率的复杂医疗干预措施:具有经济评价的中断时间序列分析。
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):90-98. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053476. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Cardiorespiratory hospitalisation and mortality reductions after smoking bans in Switzerland.瑞士实施禁烟令后心肺疾病住院率及死亡率的降低情况。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Dec 19;146:w14381. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14381. eCollection 2016.
8
Indoor tobacco legislation is associated with fewer emergency department visits for asthma exacerbation in children.室内烟草立法与儿童因哮喘加重而到急诊科就诊的次数减少有关。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Dec;117(6):641-645. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.10.005.
9
Smoke-free legislation and child health.无烟立法与儿童健康。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 17;26:16067. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.67.
10
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家310种疾病和损伤的发病率、患病率及伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.