• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部轮廓中上颌和颧骨中面部位置的区分。

Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile.

作者信息

Chalala Chimène, Ghafari Joseph G

机构信息

Departments of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lebanese University and American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Dec 10;7:e8200. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8200. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.8200
PMID:31844585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6910109/
Abstract

AIMS

To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: , , , ,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements.

RESULTS

All measurements were statistically significantly different between and groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (τ = 0.71; < 0.001) and NG and SG (τ = 0.70; < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces.

CONCLUSION

Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images.

摘要

目的

定义区分上颌和颧骨区域的面中部位置,并评估辨别面中部扁平度和丰满度的相应头影测量特征。

材料与方法

在我校正畸诊所筛选出183例未生长发育的正畸患者(年龄25.98±8.43岁)治疗前的头颅侧位X线片。根据鼻根点和蝶鞍点到J点和G点的距离(NJ、SJ、NG和SG),将正畸患者的头颅侧位片分为四组: , , , 。J是连接眶下点到A点距离的中点,G是连接眼眶、颧突和翼上颌裂的三角形的中心。统计分析包括测量值之间最佳相关性的肯德尔tau-b检验。

结果

组和 组之间所有测量值均有统计学显著差异。NJ与SJ之间的相关性最高(τ = 0.71;P < 0.001),NG与SG之间的相关性最高(τ = 0.70;P < 0.001)。面中部扁平的特征是颅底和腭平面倾斜、高度散开型和上颌后缩。面中部丰满的情况则相反。

结论

在鼻上颌和颧骨颧弓结构中对面中部骨骼位置进行了差异评估。根据这种分层确定了颅面特征,表明其在面部诊断中的应用潜力以及在三维锥形束计算机断层扫描图像上进行测试的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b52/6910109/1c47e3fb2517/peerj-07-8200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b52/6910109/9ffde9789eac/peerj-07-8200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b52/6910109/1c47e3fb2517/peerj-07-8200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b52/6910109/9ffde9789eac/peerj-07-8200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b52/6910109/1c47e3fb2517/peerj-07-8200-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile.面部轮廓中上颌和颧骨中面部位置的区分。
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 10;7:e8200. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8200. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.锥束计算机断层扫描在上颌区域配准中两个参考区域的比较及可重复性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):533-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.026.
3
Orthodontic Treatment Effect on Inclination of Maxillary Incisors and Growth Axes in Adult Patients with Various Mandibular Divergent Patterns.不同下颌骨发散型成人患者的正畸治疗对上颌切牙倾斜度和生长轴的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):1008-1013.
4
Gingivosupraperiosteoplasty following Presurgical Maxillary Orthopedics Is Associated with Normal Midface Growth in Complete Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Patients at Mixed Dentition.术前上颌骨矫形术后牙龈骨膜瓣转移术与混合牙列期完全单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者的正常面中部生长相关。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):1335-1346. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008582.
5
Relationship between pterygomaxillary fissure morphology and maxillary/mandibular position : A cone beam computed tomography assessment.翼上颌裂形态与上颌/下颌位置的关系:锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2020 May;81(3):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00215-4. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
"The pitfalls and merits of using commonly accepted orthodontic cephalometric analyses".使用公认的正畸头影测量分析方法的陷阱与优点
J Gen Orthod. 1997 Dec;8(4):6-17.
7
A cephalometric study to ascertain the use of nasion as a guide in locating the position of orbitale as an anterior reference point among a population of South Coastal Karnataka.一项头影测量研究,以确定在南卡纳塔克邦沿海人群中,将鼻根点用作确定眶点作为前参考点位置的指南的用途。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Jul;4(3):325-30. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.118382.
8
Zygomaticomaxillary modifications in the horizontal plane induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with CBCT images.颧骨-上颌骨在微植体支抗骨扩张器作用下的水平向改建:CBCT 影像分析。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Oct 22;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0240-2.
9
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的三维麦克纳马拉头影测量分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;29(4):895-899. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004248.
10
Assessment of anterior malar projection using visual photographs and lateral cephalograms: A comparative study.使用视觉照片和头颅侧位片评估颧骨前突:一项对比研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Sep 6;7:15. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_30_18. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Hard- and soft-tissue profiles of the midface region in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography multiplanar-reconstructed image analysis.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描多平面重建图像分析对Ⅲ类骨性错牙合患者中面部区域的软硬组织轮廓进行研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2018 May;48(3):143-152. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.143. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
2
Is Augmentation Required to Correct Malar Deficiency With Maxillary Advancement?上颌前徙矫正颧骨不足时是否需要植骨?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;76(6):1283-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Cheek and Chin Implants to Enhance Facelift Results.
脸颊和下巴植入物以提升面部提升效果。
Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;33(3):279-284. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598055. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.用于评估垂直生长型的各种头影测量参数的诊断效能
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):41-9. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.041-049.oar.
5
Reconsidering "The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics".重新审视“传统头影测量法的不恰当性”。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):784-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.011.
6
Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.临床推荐意见:关于在口腔正畸学中使用锥形束计算机断层扫描技术的问题。[更正]。美国口腔颌面放射学会的立场声明。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Aug;116(2):238-57. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002.
7
Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.正颌外科中的头影测量预测方法。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011 Sep;10(3):236-45. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0228-7. Epub 2011 May 17.
8
Age-dependant cephalometric standards as determined by multilevel modeling.通过多水平模型确定的年龄依赖性头影测量标准。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.025.
9
New posteroanterior cephalometric norms: a comparison with craniofacial measures of children treated with palatal expansion.
Angle Orthod. 2001 Aug;71(4):285-92. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0285:NPCNAC>2.0.CO;2.
10
Predicting upper lip response to 4-piece maxillary LeFort I osteotomy.预测上颌骨LeFort I型四片段截骨术后上唇的反应。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Aug;120(2):124-33. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.115614.