Järnefelt Heli, Härmä Mikko, Sallinen Mikael, Virkkala Jussi, Paajanen Teemu, Martimo Kari-Pekka, Hublin Christer
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Topeliuksenkatu 41 b, 00250, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Jul;93(5):535-550. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01504-6. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for insomnia (CBT-I) to that of a sleep hygiene intervention in a randomized controlled design among shift workers. We also studied whether the features of shift work disorder (SWD) affected the results.
A total of 83 shift workers with insomnia disorder were partially randomized into a group-based CBT-I, self-help CBT-I, or sleep hygiene control intervention. The outcomes were assessed before and after the interventions and at 6-month follow-up using questionnaires, a sleep diary, and actigraphy.
Perceived severity of insomnia, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs, burnout symptoms, restedness, recovery after a shift, and actigraphy-based total sleep time improved after the interventions, but we found no significant differences between the interventions. Mood symptoms improved only among the group-based CBT-I intervention participants. Non-SWD participants had more mental diseases and symptoms, used more sleep-promoting medication, and had pronounced insomnia severity and more dysfunctional beliefs than those with SWD. After the interventions, non-SWD participants showed more prominent improvements than those with SWD.
Our results showed no significant differences between the sleep improvements of the shift workers in the CBT-I interventions and of those in the sleep hygiene control intervention. Alleviation of mood symptoms seemed to be the main added value of the group-based CBT-I intervention compared to the control intervention. The clinical condition of the non-SWD participants was more severe and these participants benefitted more from the interventions than the SWD participants did.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02523079.
本研究旨在通过随机对照设计,比较认知行为疗法干预失眠(CBT-I)与睡眠卫生干预对轮班工作者的效果。我们还研究了轮班工作障碍(SWD)的特征是否会影响结果。
总共83名患有失眠症的轮班工作者被部分随机分为基于小组的CBT-I组、自助CBT-I组或睡眠卫生对照干预组。在干预前后以及6个月随访时,使用问卷、睡眠日记和活动记录仪对结果进行评估。
干预后,失眠的感知严重程度、与睡眠相关的功能失调信念、倦怠症状、休息程度、轮班后的恢复情况以及基于活动记录仪的总睡眠时间均有所改善,但我们发现各干预组之间没有显著差异。情绪症状仅在基于小组的CBT-I干预参与者中有所改善。与患有SWD的参与者相比,非SWD参与者患有更多的精神疾病和症状,使用更多的助眠药物,失眠严重程度更明显,功能失调信念更多。干预后,非SWD参与者的改善比患有SWD的参与者更显著。
我们的结果表明,CBT-I干预的轮班工作者与睡眠卫生对照干预的轮班工作者在睡眠改善方面没有显著差异。与对照干预相比,缓解情绪症状似乎是基于小组的CBT-I干预的主要附加价值。非SWD参与者的临床状况更严重,这些参与者从干预中获益比SWD参与者更多。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02523079。