Suppr超能文献

青少年物质使用治疗计划的需求和结果优先化:一项在线修正德尔菲法研究。

Prioritizing Needs and Outcomes for Adolescent Substance Use Treatment Planning: An Online Modified-Delphi Process.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (SG), RAND Corporation, CA (SG, ERP, SBH, DK), RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA (BAG).

出版信息

J Addict Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;14(4):e83-e88. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000605.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Key stakeholders can have differing views about which information is essential to inform placement decisions for all patients. This study examined consensus across stakeholder groups on the most important individual needs and treatment outcomes for informing decisions specifically about the level of care for an adolescent in substance use treatment.

METHODS

We conducted an online modified-Delphi process with treatment providers, policymakers, researchers, and parents of adolescents who have received substance use treatment. Participants rated 48 individual needs from the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Initial that were mapped onto the 6 dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine Criteria. In addition, participants rated 10 treatment outcomes from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Outcome Measures. We assessed consensus within stakeholder groups using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. We considered the items reaching consensus with the highest ratings across stakeholder groups as the most important individual needs and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We recruited 194 participants (81 providers, 54 policymakers, 32 researchers, 27 parents). Participants identified suicidality and severity of substance use disorder symptoms as the most important individual needs, and reduction in substance use as the most important treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized procedures for matching adolescents to levels of care for substance use treatment should at a minimum be based on assessments of suicidality and severity of substance use disorder symptoms, and consider reduction in substance use as a primary treatment outcome. These findings can progress the development of "level-of-care" decision rules specifically for adolescents.

摘要

目的

关键利益相关者对于哪些信息对于告知所有患者的安置决策至关重要可能存在不同的看法。本研究考察了利益相关者群体在特定于青少年物质使用治疗护理水平的决策中,告知决策的最重要的个体需求和治疗结果方面的共识。

方法

我们使用治疗提供者、政策制定者、研究人员和接受过物质使用治疗的青少年的父母进行了在线修改后的 Delphi 过程。参与者对映射到美国成瘾医学协会标准 6 个维度的全球个体需求初始评估中的 48 个个体需求进行了评分。此外,参与者还对物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局的国家结果衡量标准中的 10 个治疗结果进行了评分。我们使用 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法评估了利益相关者群体内的共识。我们认为在所有利益相关者群体中获得最高评分的项目是最重要的个体需求和治疗结果。

结果

我们招募了 194 名参与者(81 名提供者、54 名政策制定者、32 名研究人员、27 名父母)。参与者将自杀意念和物质使用障碍症状的严重程度确定为最重要的个体需求,将物质使用减少确定为最重要的治疗结果。

结论

用于匹配青少年接受物质使用治疗的护理水平的标准化程序至少应基于自杀意念和物质使用障碍症状的严重程度评估,并且应将物质使用减少作为主要治疗结果考虑。这些发现可以促进为青少年专门制定“护理水平”决策规则的发展。

相似文献

1
2
Practical factors determining adolescent substance use treatment settings: Results from four online stakeholder panels.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Feb;109:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
6
Achieving consensus across diverse stakeholders on quality measures for mental healthcare.
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1246-53. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00012.
9
Identifying optimal level-of-care placement decisions for adolescent substance use treatment.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107991. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107991. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Performance measures for early psychosis treatment services.
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Dec;56(12):1570-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.12.1570.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and implementability of state-level naloxone access policies: Expert consensus from an online modified-Delphi process.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Dec;98:103383. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103383. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Practical factors determining adolescent substance use treatment settings: Results from four online stakeholder panels.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Feb;109:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4S):S61-S75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.021.
3
4
Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 23;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174.
5
Access to treatment for adolescents with substance use and co-occurring disorders: challenges and opportunities.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;49(7):637-46; quiz 725-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 May 8.
6
Screening and assessing adolescent substance use disorders in clinical populations.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;47(7):740-4. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31817395cf.
7
Evidence-based practices for substance use disorders.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;26(4):991-1010. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00073-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验