Emery Michael A, Eitan Shoshana
Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA; Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience (TAMIN), USA.
Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA; Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience (TAMIN), USA.
Burns. 2020 May;46(3):503-513. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
Burn injury pain is a significant public health problem. Burn injury treatment has improved tremendously in recent decades. However, an unintended consequence is that a larger number of patients now survive more severe injuries, and face intense pain that is very hard to treat. Although many efforts have been made to find alternative treatments, opioids remain the most effective medication available. Burn patients are frequently prescribed opioids in doses and durations that are significantly higher and longer than standard analgesic dosing guidelines. Despite this, many continue to experience unrelieved pain. They are also placed at a higher risk for developing dependence and opioid use disorder. Burn injury profoundly alters the functional state of the immune system. It also alters the expression levels of receptor, effector, and signaling molecules within the spinal cord's dorsal horn. These alterations could explain the reduced potency of opioids. However, recent studies demonstrate that different opioids signal preferentially via differential signaling pathways. This ligand-specific signaling by different opioids implies that burn injury may reduce the antinociceptive potency of opioids to different degrees, in a drug-specific manner. Indeed, recent findings hint at drug-specific differences in the ability of opioids to manage burn pain early after injury, as well as differences in their ability to prevent or treat the development of chronic and neuropathic pain. Here we review the current state of opioid treatment, as well as new findings that could potentially lead to opioid-based pain management strategies that may be significantly more effective than the current solutions.
烧伤疼痛是一个重大的公共卫生问题。近几十年来,烧伤治疗有了巨大改善。然而,一个意外的后果是,现在有更多患者在更严重的烧伤中存活下来,但却面临着极难治疗的剧痛。尽管人们已经做出了许多努力来寻找替代治疗方法,但阿片类药物仍然是现有的最有效的药物。烧伤患者经常被开具阿片类药物,其剂量和使用时间显著高于和长于标准镇痛给药指南。尽管如此,许多患者仍持续经历疼痛无法缓解的情况。他们还面临着更高的产生依赖性和阿片类药物使用障碍的风险。烧伤会深刻改变免疫系统的功能状态。它还会改变脊髓背角内受体、效应器和信号分子的表达水平。这些改变可能解释了阿片类药物效力的降低。然而,最近的研究表明,不同的阿片类药物通过不同的信号通路优先发出信号。不同阿片类药物的这种配体特异性信号传导意味着,烧伤可能以药物特异性的方式不同程度地降低阿片类药物的镇痛效力。事实上,最近的研究结果暗示了阿片类药物在损伤后早期控制烧伤疼痛能力方面的药物特异性差异,以及它们预防或治疗慢性和神经性疼痛发展能力的差异。在此,我们综述阿片类药物治疗的现状,以及可能导致基于阿片类药物的疼痛管理策略的新发现,这些策略可能比目前的解决方案显著更有效。