• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿片类物质使用障碍患者中,美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮处方的心脏和死亡率结局差异。

Cardiac and mortality outcome differences between methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions in patients with an opioid use disorder.

机构信息

Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2023 Dec;79(12):2869-2883. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23582. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.23582
PMID:37584532
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

More than 109,000 Americans died of drug overdose in 2022, with 81,231 overdose deaths involving opioids. Methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone are the most widely used medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) and the most effective intervention for preventing overdose deaths. However, there is a concern that methadone results in long QT syndrome, which increases the risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias. Currently few studies have systematically evaluated both the short-term and long-term differences in cardiac and mortality outcomes between MOUD.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risks of cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome and overall mortality between patients with opioid use disorders (OUD) who were prescribed methadone, buprenorphine or naltrexone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter and nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States. The study population was comprised of 144,141 patients who had medical encounters for OUD in 2016-2022, were prescribed MOUD within 1 month following a medical encounter for OUD diagnosis and had no diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias or long QT syndrome before any MOUD prescription. The study population was divided into three cohorts: (1) Methadone cohort (n = 40,938)-who were only prescribed methadone. (2) Buprenorphine cohort (n = 80,055)-who were only prescribed buprenorphine. (3) Naltrexone cohort (n = 5,738)-who were only prescribed naltrexone.

EXPOSURES

methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome, and death. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of outcomes at six different follow-up time frames (1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year) by comparing propensity-score matched cohorts using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with OUD who were prescribed methadone had significantly higher risks of cardiac arrhythmias, long QT syndrome and death compared with propensity-score matched patients with OUD who were prescribed buprenorphine or naltrexone. For the 1-month follow-up, the overall risk for cardiac arrythmias was 1.03% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.87% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39); The overall risk for long QT syndrome was 0.35% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.15% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.75-3.28); The overall mortality was 0.59% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.41% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.21-1.81). The increased risk persisted for 5 years: cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23-1.38), long QT syndrome (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.76-3.58), death (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.41-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Methadone was associated with a significantly higher risk for cardiac and mortality outcomes than buprenorphine and naltrexone. These findings are relevant to the development of guidelines for medication selection when initiating MOUD treatment and inform future medication development for OUD that minimizes risks while maximizing benefits.

摘要

重要性

2022 年,美国有超过 109000 人死于药物过量,其中 81231 例与阿片类药物有关。美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)最广泛使用的药物,也是预防药物过量死亡的最有效干预措施。然而,有一种担忧是美沙酮会导致长 QT 综合征,从而增加致命性心律失常的风险。目前,很少有研究系统地评估 MOUD 之间在心脏和死亡率结果方面的短期和长期差异。

目的

比较患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患者在接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮治疗时发生心律失常、长 QT 综合征和总体死亡率的风险。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于美国多中心和全国范围内电子健康记录(EHR)的回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括 2016 年至 2022 年期间有 OUD 医疗就诊记录的 144141 名患者,他们在 OUD 诊断后 1 个月内接受了 MOUD 治疗,且在接受任何 MOUD 处方前没有心律失常或长 QT 综合征的诊断。研究人群分为三个队列:(1)美沙酮队列(n=40938)-仅接受美沙酮治疗;(2)丁丙诺啡队列(n=80055)-仅接受丁丙诺啡治疗;(3)纳曲酮队列(n=5738)-仅接受纳曲酮治疗。

暴露因素

美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮。

主要结果和测量

心脏性心律失常、长 QT 综合征和死亡。通过使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析比较倾向评分匹配队列,在六个不同的随访时间框架(1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、1 年、3 年和 5 年)内比较结局的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

与接受丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮治疗的 OUD 患者相比,接受美沙酮治疗的 OUD 患者在 1 个月的随访中,心律失常的总体风险为 1.03%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.87%(HR:1.20,95%CI:1.04-1.39);长 QT 综合征的总体风险为 0.35%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.15%(HR:2.40,95%CI:1.75-3.28);总死亡率为 0.59%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.41%(HR:1.48,95%CI:1.21-1.81)。这种风险增加持续了 5 年:心律失常(HR:1.31,95%CI:1.23-1.38)、长 QT 综合征(HR:3.14,95%CI:2.76-3.58)、死亡(HR:1.50,95%CI:1.41-1.59)。

结论和相关性

与丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮相比,美沙酮与心脏和死亡率结果的风险显著增加。这些发现与制定 MOUD 治疗开始时的药物选择指南有关,并为未来的阿片类药物使用障碍药物开发提供信息,在最大限度地提高益处的同时最小化风险。

相似文献

1
Cardiac and mortality outcome differences between methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions in patients with an opioid use disorder.阿片类物质使用障碍患者中,美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮处方的心脏和死亡率结局差异。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Dec;79(12):2869-2883. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23582. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Treatment Pathways for Opioid Use Disorder.不同阿片类药物使用障碍治疗途径的疗效比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20622.
3
Comparative Effectiveness Associated With Buprenorphine and Naltrexone in Opioid Use Disorder and Cooccurring Polysubstance Use.阿片类物质使用障碍及共病多种物质使用中丁丙诺啡与纳曲酮的疗效比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211363. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11363.
4
Evaluation of medications used for opioid use disorder in emergency departments: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.评估急诊科用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物:2020 年国家医院门诊医疗调查的横断面分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
Receipt of Telehealth Services, Receipt and Retention of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder, and Medically Treated Overdose Among Medicare Beneficiaries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.医疗保险受益人的远程医疗服务的接受情况、阿片类药物使用障碍药物的获得和保留情况,以及在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的药物治疗过量情况。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):981-992. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2284.
6
Pregnancy Rates Among Women Treated with Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的女性的妊娠率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jun;39(8):1342-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08689-8. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Opioid Overdose After Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Initiation Following Hospitalization or ED Visit.住院或急诊就诊后开始治疗阿片类药物使用障碍时的阿片类药物过量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423954. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23954.
8
Medication for Opioid Use Disorder After Nonfatal Opioid Overdose and Association With Mortality: A Cohort Study.非致死性阿片类药物过量后治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物与死亡率的关系:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Aug 7;169(3):137-145. doi: 10.7326/M17-3107. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Prior use of medications for opioid use disorder in ED patients with opioid overdose: prevalence, misuse and overdose severity.ED 患者中阿片类药物过量的药物治疗药物使用障碍的既往使用情况:流行率、误用和过量严重程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
Receipt of Timely Addiction Treatment and Association of Early Medication Treatment With Retention in Care Among Youths With Opioid Use Disorder.及时接受成瘾治疗与早期药物治疗对阿片类药物使用障碍青年患者治疗保留率的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1029-1037. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2143.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Assessment of Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder under Methadone Treatment.美沙酮治疗下阿片类物质使用障碍个体的心脏评估
J Res Pharm Pract. 2025 Aug 7;14(2):59-65. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_15_25. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Comparative analysis of methods for identifying multimorbidity patterns among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective single-cohort study.阿片类物质使用障碍患者中多重疾病模式识别方法的比较分析:一项回顾性单队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0324548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324548. eCollection 2025.
3
Detection of Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions in Fatal Torsades de Pointes: Disproportionality Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
致命性尖端扭转型室速中具有临床意义的药物相互作用的检测:对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的不成比例分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 25;27:e65872. doi: 10.2196/65872.
4
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and 13 Obesity-Associated Cancers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病患者的 13 种肥胖相关癌症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21305.
5
Association of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence and Hepatic Decompensation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.GLP-1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病患者肝癌发病率和肝功能失代偿的相关性。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Sep;167(4):689-703. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.04.029. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Association of semaglutide with reduced incidence and relapse of cannabis use disorder in real-world populations: a retrospective cohort study.在真实人群中,与大麻使用障碍的发病率和复发率降低相关的司美格鲁肽:一项回顾性队列研究。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;29(8):2587-2598. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02498-5. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
Time trend and seasonality in medically attended respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in US children aged 0-5 years, January 2010-January 2023.美国 0-5 岁儿童因医疗干预的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染的时间趋势和季节性,2010 年 1 月-2023 年 1 月。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002453.
8
Association of COVID-19 with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in children aged 0-5 years in the USA in 2022: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.2022 年美国 0-5 岁儿童 COVID-19 与呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染的相关性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002456.