Suppr超能文献

阿片类物质使用障碍患者中,美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮处方的心脏和死亡率结局差异。

Cardiac and mortality outcome differences between methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions in patients with an opioid use disorder.

机构信息

Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2023 Dec;79(12):2869-2883. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23582. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

More than 109,000 Americans died of drug overdose in 2022, with 81,231 overdose deaths involving opioids. Methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone are the most widely used medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) and the most effective intervention for preventing overdose deaths. However, there is a concern that methadone results in long QT syndrome, which increases the risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias. Currently few studies have systematically evaluated both the short-term and long-term differences in cardiac and mortality outcomes between MOUD.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risks of cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome and overall mortality between patients with opioid use disorders (OUD) who were prescribed methadone, buprenorphine or naltrexone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter and nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States. The study population was comprised of 144,141 patients who had medical encounters for OUD in 2016-2022, were prescribed MOUD within 1 month following a medical encounter for OUD diagnosis and had no diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias or long QT syndrome before any MOUD prescription. The study population was divided into three cohorts: (1) Methadone cohort (n = 40,938)-who were only prescribed methadone. (2) Buprenorphine cohort (n = 80,055)-who were only prescribed buprenorphine. (3) Naltrexone cohort (n = 5,738)-who were only prescribed naltrexone.

EXPOSURES

methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome, and death. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of outcomes at six different follow-up time frames (1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year) by comparing propensity-score matched cohorts using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with OUD who were prescribed methadone had significantly higher risks of cardiac arrhythmias, long QT syndrome and death compared with propensity-score matched patients with OUD who were prescribed buprenorphine or naltrexone. For the 1-month follow-up, the overall risk for cardiac arrythmias was 1.03% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.87% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39); The overall risk for long QT syndrome was 0.35% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.15% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.75-3.28); The overall mortality was 0.59% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.41% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.21-1.81). The increased risk persisted for 5 years: cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23-1.38), long QT syndrome (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.76-3.58), death (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.41-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Methadone was associated with a significantly higher risk for cardiac and mortality outcomes than buprenorphine and naltrexone. These findings are relevant to the development of guidelines for medication selection when initiating MOUD treatment and inform future medication development for OUD that minimizes risks while maximizing benefits.

摘要

重要性

2022 年,美国有超过 109000 人死于药物过量,其中 81231 例与阿片类药物有关。美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)最广泛使用的药物,也是预防药物过量死亡的最有效干预措施。然而,有一种担忧是美沙酮会导致长 QT 综合征,从而增加致命性心律失常的风险。目前,很少有研究系统地评估 MOUD 之间在心脏和死亡率结果方面的短期和长期差异。

目的

比较患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患者在接受美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮治疗时发生心律失常、长 QT 综合征和总体死亡率的风险。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于美国多中心和全国范围内电子健康记录(EHR)的回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括 2016 年至 2022 年期间有 OUD 医疗就诊记录的 144141 名患者,他们在 OUD 诊断后 1 个月内接受了 MOUD 治疗,且在接受任何 MOUD 处方前没有心律失常或长 QT 综合征的诊断。研究人群分为三个队列:(1)美沙酮队列(n=40938)-仅接受美沙酮治疗;(2)丁丙诺啡队列(n=80055)-仅接受丁丙诺啡治疗;(3)纳曲酮队列(n=5738)-仅接受纳曲酮治疗。

暴露因素

美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮。

主要结果和测量

心脏性心律失常、长 QT 综合征和死亡。通过使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析比较倾向评分匹配队列,在六个不同的随访时间框架(1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、1 年、3 年和 5 年)内比较结局的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

与接受丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮治疗的 OUD 患者相比,接受美沙酮治疗的 OUD 患者在 1 个月的随访中,心律失常的总体风险为 1.03%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.87%(HR:1.20,95%CI:1.04-1.39);长 QT 综合征的总体风险为 0.35%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.15%(HR:2.40,95%CI:1.75-3.28);总死亡率为 0.59%,高于匹配的丁丙诺啡队列的 0.41%(HR:1.48,95%CI:1.21-1.81)。这种风险增加持续了 5 年:心律失常(HR:1.31,95%CI:1.23-1.38)、长 QT 综合征(HR:3.14,95%CI:2.76-3.58)、死亡(HR:1.50,95%CI:1.41-1.59)。

结论和相关性

与丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮相比,美沙酮与心脏和死亡率结果的风险显著增加。这些发现与制定 MOUD 治疗开始时的药物选择指南有关,并为未来的阿片类药物使用障碍药物开发提供信息,在最大限度地提高益处的同时最小化风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验