• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价数据仓库 (SRDR):公开可用数据的描述性特征及研究机会。

The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S121-8, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S121-8, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y
PMID:31862012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6925515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conducting systematic reviews ("reviews") requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort, standardizing data, supporting analyses to address secondary research questions, and facilitating methodologic research. Funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a free, web-based, open-source, data management and archival platform for reviews. Our specific objectives in this paper are to describe (1) the current extent of usage of SRDR and (2) the characteristics of all projects with publicly available data on the SRDR website.

METHODS

We examined all projects with data made publicly available through SRDR as of November 12, 2019. We extracted information about the characteristics of these projects. Two investigators extracted and verified the data.

RESULTS

SRDR has had 2552 individual user accounts belonging to users from 80 countries. Since SRDR's launch in 2012, data have been made available publicly for 152 of the 735 projects in SRDR (21%), at a rate of 24.5 projects per year, on average. Most projects are in clinical fields (144/152 projects; 95%); most have evaluated interventions (therapeutic or preventive) (109/152; 72%). The most frequent health areas addressed are mental and behavioral disorders (31/152; 20%) and diseases of the eye and ocular adnexa (23/152; 15%). Two-thirds of the projects (104/152; 67%) were funded by AHRQ, and one-sixth (23/152; 15%) are Cochrane reviews. The 152 projects each address a median of 3 research questions (IQR 1-5) and include a median of 70 studies (IQR 20-130).

CONCLUSIONS

Until we arrive at a future in which the systematic review and broader research communities are comfortable with the accuracy of automated data extraction, re-use of data extracted by humans has the potential to help reduce redundancy and costs. The 152 projects with publicly available data through SRDR, and the more than 15,000 studies therein, are freely available to researchers and the general public who might be working on similar reviews or updates of reviews or who want access to the data for decision-making, meta-research, or other purposes.

摘要

背景

进行系统评价(“综述”)需要大量的努力和资源。公开提取综述过程中所获得的数据可能会带来许多好处,包括减少不必要的重复工作、标准化数据、支持分析以解决次要研究问题,以及促进方法学研究。由美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)资助的系统评价数据存储库(SRDR)是一个免费的、基于网络的、开源的数据管理和存储平台,适用于综述。我们在本文中的具体目标是描述(1)SRDR 的当前使用程度,以及(2)SRDR 网站上具有公开可用数据的所有项目的特征。

方法

我们检查了截至 2019 年 11 月 12 日通过 SRDR 公开提供数据的所有项目。我们提取了这些项目特征的信息。两名调查员提取并验证了数据。

结果

SRDR 拥有来自 80 个国家的 2552 个用户的个人账户。自 2012 年 SRDR 推出以来,已有 152 个(21%)SRDR 中的项目的数据被公开提供,平均每年 24.5 个项目。大多数项目都在临床领域(144/152 个项目;95%),大多数项目评估了干预措施(治疗或预防)(109/152;72%)。涉及的最常见健康领域是精神和行为障碍(31/152;20%)和眼部及眼附属器疾病(23/152;15%)。三分之二的项目(104/152;67%)由 AHRQ 资助,六分之一(23/152;15%)是 Cochrane 综述。这 152 个项目每个项目都解决了中位数为 3 个研究问题(IQR 1-5),并包含中位数为 70 项研究(IQR 20-130)。

结论

在我们进入系统评价和更广泛的研究界对自动化数据提取的准确性感到满意的未来之前,由人类提取的数据的再利用有可能有助于减少冗余和成本。通过 SRDR 公开提供数据的 152 个项目,以及其中的 15000 多项研究,可供从事类似综述或综述更新的研究人员和公众免费使用,他们可能需要访问这些数据以进行决策、元研究或其他目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73fe/6925515/5256fdf5cac3/13643_2019_1250_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73fe/6925515/5256fdf5cac3/13643_2019_1250_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73fe/6925515/5256fdf5cac3/13643_2019_1250_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.系统评价数据仓库 (SRDR):公开可用数据的描述性特征及研究机会。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): Building the Evidence for Oral Health Interventions in the Population With Intellectual and Developmental Disability.一种使用系统评价数据存储库(SRDR)的结构化方法:为智力和发育障碍人群的口腔健康干预措施建立证据。
Eval Rev. 2017 Apr;41(2):111-129. doi: 10.1177/0193841X16664811. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.认知行为疗法治疗多种疾病的系统评价和全景元分析概述。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(9):1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta25090.
9
10
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of ayahuasca in preclinical studies with animals: a systematic review.阿亚瓦斯卡(一种南美传统饮料)在动物临床前研究中的作用:一项系统综述。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2025 Aug 29;58:e14687. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2025e14687. eCollection 2025.
2
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in Ethiopia: a systematic review.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇和围产期死亡监测与应对实施的促进因素和障碍:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 22;22(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02115-w.
3
Single-Stage Versus 2-Stage Facial Reanimation With a Free Functional Muscle Flap: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study.系统评价中结局选择和定义导致纳入荟萃分析的合格研究较少:一项病例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0898-2.
2
A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews.一项随机试验为系统评价中传统注释与电子注释提取方法的准确性和效率提供了新证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
单阶段与两阶段游离功能性肌瓣面部重建:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 21;14:e64009. doi: 10.2196/64009.
4
Effects of high-intensity interval training on patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review.高强度间歇训练对炎症性关节炎患者的影响:一项系统评价
BMC Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 7;9(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00540-9.
5
Dry eye post-cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白内障手术后干眼症:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03841-8.
6
Synthetic biology in Indonesia: Potential and projection in a country with mega biodiversity.印度尼西亚的合成生物学:一个拥有巨大多样性国家的潜力与展望。
Biotechnol Notes. 2023 Feb 28;4:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.biotno.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023.
7
The American Society for Microbiology collaboration with the CDC Laboratory Medicine Best Practices initiative for evidence-based laboratory medicine.美国微生物学会与美国疾病控制与预防中心实验室医学最佳实践倡议合作开展循证实验室医学。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Dec 10;37(4):e0006518. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00065-18. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
8
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses.九条开放元分析的快速提示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 25;20(7):e1012252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
What is the association between the microbiome and cognition? An umbrella review protocol.肠道菌群与认知之间有何关联?一项伞式评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 18;14(6):e077873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077873.
10
Interventions for Dry Eye: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.干眼干预措施:系统评价概述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;142(1):58-74. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.5751.
非 Cochrane 系统评价中,统计学意义并不影响发表时间:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Reliability of the Evidence Addressing Treatment of Corneal Diseases: A Summary of Systematic Reviews.评估角膜疾病治疗方法的证据的可靠性:系统评价综述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):775-785. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1063.
5
Editorial: Systematic review automation thematic series.社论:系统评价自动化专题系列
Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 11;8(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0974-z.
6
Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.自动化工具在系统评价中的使用。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):72-82. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1335. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence.系统评价相对于新证据的更新时间。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 17;7(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0856-9.
8
Features and functioning of Data Abstraction Assistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews.Data Abstraction Assistant 的特点和功能,这是一款用于系统评价数据提取的软件应用程序。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):2-14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1326. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Research Questions and Outcomes Prioritized by Patients With Dry Eye.干眼患者优先考虑的研究问题和结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 1;136(10):1170-1179. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3352.
10
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.PROSPERO 系统评价注册:30000 条记录,且仍在增加。
Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4.