• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

九条开放元分析的快速提示。

Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 25;20(7):e1012252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252
PMID:39052540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11271959/
Abstract

Open science principles are revolutionizing the transparency, reproducibility, and accessibility of research. Meta-analysis has become a key technique for synthesizing data across studies in a principled way; however, its impact is contingent on adherence to open science practices. Here, we outline 9 quick tips for open meta-analyses, aimed at guiding researchers to maximize the reach and utility of their findings. We advocate for outlining preregistering clear protocols, opting for open tools and software, and the use of version control systems to ensure transparency and facilitate collaboration. We further emphasize the importance of reproducibility, for example, by sharing search syntax and analysis scripts, and discuss the benefits of planning for dynamic updating to enable living meta-analyses. We also recommend publication in open-access formats, as well as open data, open code, and open access publication. We close by encouraging active promotion of research findings to bridge the gap between complex syntheses and public discourse, and provide a detailed submission checklist to equip researchers, reviewers and journal editors with a structured approach to conducting and reporting open meta-analyses.

摘要

开放科学原则正在彻底改变研究的透明度、可重复性和可获取性。元分析已成为一种通过有原则的方式综合研究数据的关键技术;然而,其影响取决于对开放科学实践的遵守。在这里,我们概述了 9 个用于开放元分析的快速技巧,旨在指导研究人员最大限度地扩大其研究结果的影响力和实用性。我们主张概述预先注册的明确方案,选择开放的工具和软件,并使用版本控制系统来确保透明度和促进协作。我们进一步强调了可重复性的重要性,例如,通过共享搜索语法和分析脚本,并讨论了为动态更新计划的好处,以实现实时元分析。我们还建议以开放获取的格式发表论文,以及开放数据、开放代码和开放获取出版。最后,我们鼓励积极推广研究结果,以缩小复杂综合与公众讨论之间的差距,并提供详细的提交清单,为研究人员、评论员和期刊编辑提供一种进行和报告开放元分析的结构化方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/11271959/5e5679560a1c/pcbi.1012252.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/11271959/5e5679560a1c/pcbi.1012252.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/11271959/5e5679560a1c/pcbi.1012252.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses.九条开放元分析的快速提示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 25;20(7):e1012252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Conducting a meta-analysis in the age of open science: Tools, tips, and practical recommendations.在开放科学时代进行荟萃分析:工具、技巧及实用建议。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Jun;27(3):426-432. doi: 10.1037/met0000351. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology.迈向开放且可重复的流行病学研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 6;192(4):658-664. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad007.
5
A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).对 2000 年至 2020 年间发表的临床心理干预元分析中与透明度和可重复性报告实践相关的元综述。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):334-349. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.生态学和进化生物学系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA 扩展。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Oct;96(5):1695-1722. doi: 10.1111/brv.12721. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.发表偏倚对生态学和进化生物学中的效应大小、统计功效和幅度(M 型)以及符号(S 型)错误有影响。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology.生态学中的开放科学、可重复性和透明度。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jan;29(1):e01822. doi: 10.1002/eap.1822. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of perches in promoting bird-mediated seed dispersal for natural forest regeneration: a systematic review.栖木在促进鸟类介导的种子传播以实现天然林更新方面的有效性:一项系统综述
Environ Evid. 2025 Jun 14;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13750-025-00363-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten simple rules for interpreting and evaluating a meta-analysis.解读和评估荟萃分析的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Sep 28;19(9):e1011461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011461. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Ten simple rules for designing and conducting undergraduate replication projects.设计和开展本科生复制项目的 10 个简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Mar 16;19(3):e1010957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010957. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.
医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
4
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
7
Conducting a meta-analysis in the age of open science: Tools, tips, and practical recommendations.在开放科学时代进行荟萃分析:工具、技巧及实用建议。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Jun;27(3):426-432. doi: 10.1037/met0000351. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.系统评价数据仓库 (SRDR):公开可用数据的描述性特征及研究机会。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis.revtools:一个支持证据综合文章筛选的 R 包。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Dec;10(4):606-614. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1374. Epub 2019 Oct 18.