School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1C7, Canada.
Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1C7, Canada.
J Safety Res. 2019 Dec;71:295-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
Age- and health-related changes, alongside declines in driving confidence and on-road exposure, have been implicated in crashes involving older drivers. Interventions aimed at improving behind-the-wheel behavior are diverse and their associated impact remains unclear. This systematic review examined evidence on older driver training with respect to (1) road safety knowledge; (2) self-perceived changes in driving abilities; and (3) behind-the-wheel performance. Method Nine databases were searched for English-language articles describing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of driver training interventions aimed at those aged 55+ who did not have medical or other impairments that precluded licensure. Quality appraisals were conducted using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool (RoB) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool (ROBINS - I). [PROSPERO; registration no. CRD42018087366]. Results Twenty-five RCTs and eight non-RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Interventions varied in their design and delivery where classroom-based education, or a combination of classroom-based education with on-road feedback, improved road safety knowledge. Training tailored to individual participants was found to improve self-perceived and behind-the-wheel outcomes, including crashes. Conclusions Interventions comprised of tailored training can improve knowledge of road safety, changes to self-perception of driving abilities, and improved behind-the-wheel performance of older drivers. Future research should compare modes of training delivery for this driver population to determine the optimal combinations of off- and/or on-road training. Practical applications Training programs aimed at older drivers should be supported by theory and research evidence. By conducting comparative trials with a sufficient sample size alongside well-defined outcomes that are designed in accordance with reporting guidelines, the most effective approaches for training older drivers will be identified.
年龄和健康相关的变化,以及驾驶信心和道路经验的下降,都与老年驾驶员的事故有关。旨在改善驾驶行为的干预措施多种多样,其相关影响尚不清楚。本系统评价研究了针对老年驾驶员培训的证据,涉及(1)道路安全知识;(2)自我感知的驾驶能力变化;以及(3)驾驶表现。方法 检索了 9 个数据库,以获取描述针对 55 岁以上且无医学或其他残疾从而无法获得驾照的驾驶员培训干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)和非 RCT 的英文文章。质量评估使用 Cochrane 的偏倚风险工具(RoB)和非随机干预研究偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-I)进行。[PROSPERO;注册号 CRD42018087366]。结果 25 项 RCT 和 8 项非 RCT 符合纳入标准。干预措施在设计和实施方式上有所不同,其中基于课堂的教育或课堂教育与道路反馈相结合,可以提高道路安全知识。针对个别参与者的培训被发现可以改善自我感知和驾驶表现,包括事故。结论 由量身定制的培训组成的干预措施可以提高老年驾驶员的道路安全知识、自我感知驾驶能力的变化以及驾驶表现。未来的研究应比较针对该驾驶员群体的培训模式,以确定离线和/或在线培训的最佳组合。实际应用 针对老年驾驶员的培训计划应得到理论和研究证据的支持。通过对具有足够样本量的比较试验以及根据报告指南设计的明确结果进行研究,可以确定培训老年驾驶员的最有效方法。