Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Meibergdreef 75, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Meibergdreef 75, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102116. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102116. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
Given the restricted total scanning time for clinical neuroimaging, it is unclear whether clinical diffusion MRI protocols would benefit more from higher spatial resolution or higher angular resolution. In this work, we investigated the relative benefit of improving spatial or angular resolution in diffusion MRI to separate two parallel running white matter tracts that are targets for deep brain stimulation: the anterior thalamic radiation and the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle. Both these tracts are situated in the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule, and recent studies suggest that targeting a specific tract could improve treatment efficacy. Therefore, we scanned 19 healthy volunteers at 3T and 7T according to three diffusion MRI protocols with respectively standard clinical settings, increased spatial resolution of 1.4 mm, and increased angular resolution (64 additional gradient directions at b = 2200s/mm). We performed probabilistic tractography for all protocols and quantified the separability of both tracts. The higher spatial resolution protocol improved separability by 41% with respect to the clinical standard, presumably due to decreased partial voluming. The higher angular resolution protocol resulted in increased apparent tract volumes and overlap, which is disadvantageous for application in precise treatment planning. We thus recommend to increase the spatial resolution for deep brain stimulation planning to 1.4 mm while maintaining angular resolution. This recommendation complements the general advice to aim for high angular resolution to resolve crossing fibers, confirming that the specific application and anatomical considerations are leading in clinical diffusion MRI protocol optimization.
鉴于临床神经影像学的总扫描时间有限,尚不清楚临床扩散 MRI 方案是从更高的空间分辨率还是更高的角分辨率中获益更多。在这项工作中,我们研究了在扩散 MRI 中提高空间分辨率或角分辨率以分离两条平行运行的白质束的相对益处,这两条白质束是深部脑刺激的目标:前丘脑辐射和内侧前脑束的超外侧分支。这两条束都位于内囊的腹前肢,最近的研究表明,针对特定束可能会提高治疗效果。因此,我们根据三种扩散 MRI 方案对 19 名健康志愿者在 3T 和 7T 上进行了扫描,这些方案分别具有标准临床设置、1.4mm 的更高空间分辨率和更高的角分辨率(b=2200s/mm 时增加了 64 个额外的梯度方向)。我们对所有方案进行了概率追踪,并量化了两条束的可分离性。更高空间分辨率的方案相对于临床标准提高了 41%的可分离性,这可能是由于部分容积效应降低所致。更高角分辨率的方案导致表观束体积增加和重叠,这不利于精确治疗计划的应用。因此,我们建议将深部脑刺激计划的空间分辨率提高到 1.4mm,同时保持角分辨率。这一建议补充了旨在提高角分辨率以解析交叉纤维的一般建议,证实了特定应用和解剖学考虑因素在临床扩散 MRI 方案优化中起着主导作用。