Likhitrakarn Natdanai, Golovatch Sergei I, Semenyuk Irina, Efeykin Boris D, Panha Somsak
Division of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand Maejo University Chiang Mai Thailand.
Severtsov Institute for Problems of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr. 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia Severtsov Institute for Problems of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia.
Zookeys. 2019 Dec 10;898:121-158. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.898.39265. eCollection 2019.
The genus is shown to currently be represented in Vietnam by ten species or varieties, including new records of (Attems, 1937), (de Saussure, 1860), (Attems, 1937) and Jeekel, 1964, and two new species, and A key to all eight species and two varieties known to occur in Vietnam is provided. Although the morphological characters that have been traditionally used for taxonomy are here considered superior to molecular ones, molecular-based phylogenetic relationships and taxon assignments within the tribe Orthomorphini are provisionally analyzed using fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) mitochondrial gene. The preferred phylograms, both rooted and unrooted, demonstrate the monophyly of the tribe Orthomorphini, but due to the special, uncertain or even controversial position of , which occurs closer to the genera and , the genus in current usage appears to be polyphyletic. However, if is to be treated within the monotypic genus , the monophyly of becomes manifest. On the other hand, a cautious approach is followed to avoid descriptions of suspicious new taxa/species. Thus, solely because the average genetic distance between and , as well as that between and , are both found to be negligibly small, the statuses of the sympatric and closest yet morphologically different varieties are treated only as such, i.e., infrasubspecific categories. The apparent discord observed between morphological and molecular data is obviously due to only partial and single-gene topologies used, possibly also to hybridization already known to occur in some closely related and sympatric paradoxosomatid species or even genera.
现已证明,该属目前在越南有10个物种或变种,包括(阿滕斯,1937年)、(德索绪尔,1860年)、(阿滕斯,1937年)和杰克尔,1964年的新记录,以及两个新物种, 和 。提供了越南已知的所有8个物种和2个变种的检索表。虽然传统上用于分类学的形态特征在这里被认为优于分子特征,但使用细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I(COI)线粒体基因片段对直形螨科内基于分子的系统发育关系和分类单元归属进行了初步分析。首选的系统发育树,无论是有根的还是无根的,都证明了直形螨科的单系性,但由于 更接近 属和 属,其特殊、不确定甚至有争议的位置,目前使用的 属似乎是多系的。然而,如果 将 归入单型属 , 属的单系性就会显现出来。另一方面,采用了谨慎的方法来避免描述可疑的新分类单元/物种。因此,仅仅因为发现 和 之间以及 和 之间的平均遗传距离都小到可以忽略不计,同域且形态上最接近但不同的变种的地位仅被视为亚种以下的类别。形态学和分子数据之间明显的不一致显然是由于仅使用了部分和单基因拓扑结构,也可能是由于已知在一些密切相关且同域的异足螨科物种甚至属中发生的杂交。