Research & Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Dodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box DD 1 Dodowa-Accra, Ghana; Sociology of Development and Change Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW, Hollandsweg 1, P. O. Box 8130 Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Research & Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Dodowa Health Research Centre, P. O. Box DD 1 Dodowa-Accra, Ghana; Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons, 54 Independence Avenue, Ridge, Accra, Ghana.
Midwifery. 2020 Mar;82:102576. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102576. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
Providers' adherence to case management protocols can affect quality of care. However, how and why protocols are adhered to by frontline health workers in low- and middle-income countries is not always clear. This study explored midwives' adherence to national postnatal care protocols in two public hospitals in Southern Ghana using an ethnographic study design. Ninety participant observations and 88 conversations were conducted over a 20-months period, and two group interviews held with the midwives in the two hospitals. Data was analysed using a grounded theory approach. Findings: Midwives collectively decided when to adhere, modify or totally ignore postnatal care protocols. Adherence often occurred if required resources (equipment, tools, supplies) were available. Modification occurred when midwives felt that strict adherence could have negative implications for patients and they could be seen as acting 'unprofessionally'. Ignoring or modifying protocols also occurred when midwives were uncertain of the patient's health condition; basic supplies, logistics and infrastructure needed for adherence were unavailable or inappropriate; or midwives felt they might expose themselves or their clients to physical, psychological, emotional, financial or social harm. Regardless of the reasons that midwives felt justified to ignore or modify postnatal care protocols, it appeared in many instances to lead to the provision of care of suboptimal quality. Conclusion and recommendations: Providing clinical decision-making protocols is not enough to improve mother and new born care quality and outcomes. Faced with constraining conditions of work, providers are likely to modify guidelines as part of coping behaviour. Addressing constraining conditions of work must accompany guidelines. This includes adequate risks protection for health workers and clients; and resolution of deficits in essential equipment, infrastructure, supplies and staffing.
提供者对病例管理方案的遵守情况可能会影响医疗质量。然而,在中低收入国家,一线卫生工作者如何以及为何遵守方案并不总是很清楚。本研究采用民族志研究设计,探讨了加纳南部两家公立医院的助产士对国家产后护理方案的遵守情况。在 20 个月的时间里进行了 90 次参与者观察和 88 次对话,并在这两家医院与助产士举行了两次小组访谈。使用扎根理论方法分析数据。研究结果:助产士集体决定何时遵守、修改或完全忽略产后护理方案。如果有必要的资源(设备、工具、用品),则通常会遵守。如果助产士认为严格遵守可能对患者产生负面影响,并且可能被视为行为“不专业”,则会进行修改。当助产士不确定患者的健康状况时,或者遵守方案所需的基本供应品、后勤和基础设施不可用或不适当,或者助产士感到可能会使自己或客户面临身体、心理、情感、经济或社会伤害时,也会忽略或修改协议。无论助产士认为忽略或修改产后护理方案的理由是什么,这似乎在许多情况下导致提供的护理质量不佳。结论和建议:提供临床决策方案不足以改善母婴护理质量和结果。面对工作的限制条件,提供者可能会修改指南作为应对行为的一部分。必须同时解决工作的限制条件和指南。这包括为卫生工作者和客户提供足够的风险保护;解决基本设备、基础设施、用品和人员配备方面的不足。