• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identifying the 'incredible'! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review.

作者信息

Büttner Fionn, Winters Marinus, Delahunt Eamonn, Elbers Roy, Lura Carolina B, Khan Karim M, Weir Adam, Ardern Clare L

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):801-808. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675
PMID:31871014
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Identifying the 'incredible'! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review.识别“不可思议之事”！第二部分：找出差异——严格的偏倚风险评估可能会改变系统评价的主要结果。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):801-808. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
Identifying the 'incredible'! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews.识别“不可思议之事”！第一部分：评估系统评价中纳入结果的偏倚风险。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):798-800. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers.常见的偏倚风险评估工具结构和方法：对系统评价者的启示
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Mar 1;22(3):389-393. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00463.
4
Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 2: exploring the role of the comparator, diversity, risk of bias and confidence.这项系统评价和荟萃分析会改变我的临床实践吗？第2部分：探讨对照物、多样性、偏倚风险和可信度的作用。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(23):1493-1497. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099959. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Synthesising 'best evidence in systematic reviews when randomised controlled trials are absent: three tips for authors to add value for clinician readers.在缺乏随机对照试验时，如何在系统评价中综合“最佳证据”：给作者的三个建议，为临床医生读者增添价值。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(15):948-949. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097881. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
6
Different interventions, same outcomes? Here are four good reasons.不同的干预措施，相同的结果？这里有四个充分的理由。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(15):951-952. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098978. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
7
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量：研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.运动医学系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Was it a good idea to combine the studies? Why clinicians should care about heterogeneity when making decisions based on systematic reviews.将这些研究合并是个好主意吗？为何临床医生在基于系统评价做决策时应关注异质性。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;53(7):399-401. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099516. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis.三种偏倚风险工具在观察性研究综合分析中得出相反的结论。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review.择期手部手术后术前干预对术后结局的影响：一项系统评价。
Hand Ther. 2025 Mar;30(1):19-33. doi: 10.1177/17589983241301449. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations.系统评价研究中健康状态效用值研究的质量评价：概念性考虑。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jul;42(7):767-782. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01365-z. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Effects of home-based interventions using exergames on physical and cognitive functions in community-dwelling older adults: a PRISMA-P-compliant protocol for a systematic review.
基于家用运动游戏的干预措施对社区居住老年人身体和认知功能的影响：一项符合PRISMA-P标准的系统评价方案
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:1291120. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1291120. eCollection 2023.
4
Accuracy of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.运动员静息代谢率预测方程的准确性：系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2023 Dec;53(12):2373-2398. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01896-z. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
5
The relationship between adipose tissue RAAS activity and the risk factors of prediabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脂肪组织 RAAS 活性与糖尿病前期危险因素的关系：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adipocyte. 2023 Dec;12(1):2249763. doi: 10.1080/21623945.2023.2249763.
6
Predicting the outcome of plantar heel pain in adults: a systematic review of prognostic factors.预测成年人足底足跟痛的结局：预后因素的系统评价。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 May 12;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00626-y.
7
Look into my eyes: What can eye-based measures tell us about the relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance?凝视我的双眼：基于眼部的测量指标能告诉我们多少关于身体活动和认知表现之间的关系？
J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Sep;12(5):568-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Nutritional Strategies in the Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Athletes: A Systematic Integrative Review.运动员运动系统损伤康复中的营养策略：系统综合评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 5;15(4):819. doi: 10.3390/nu15040819.
9
Alexa, let's train now! - A systematic review and classification approach to digital and home-based physical training interventions aiming to support healthy cognitive aging.Alexa，我们现在开始训练吧！——一项针对旨在支持健康认知老化的数字和家庭为基础的身体训练干预措施的系统评价和分类方法。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Jan;13(1):30-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
10
Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis.健康状态效用值的系统文献综述质量评价：描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01784-6.