Suppr超能文献

在BRAF突变型黑色素瘤治疗中,丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)抑制剂的间歇给药与持续给药对比

Intermittent Versus Continuous Dosing of MAPK Inhibitors in the Treatment of BRAF-Mutated Melanoma.

作者信息

Reger de Moura Coralie, Vercellino Laetitia, Jouenne Fanélie, Baroudjian Barouyr, Sadoux Aurélie, Louveau Baptiste, Delyon Julie, Serror Kevin, Goldwirt Lauriane, Merlet Pascal, Bouquet Fanny, Battistella Maxime, Lebbé Céleste, Mourah Samia

机构信息

Université de Paris, Inserm, UMR_S976, Paris, France; Department of Pharmacogenomics, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Transl Oncol. 2020 Feb;13(2):275-286. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Abstract

The development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) has led to major advances in melanoma treatment. However, the emergence of resistance mechanisms limits the benefit duration and a complete response occurs in less than 20% of patients receiving BRAFi ± MEKi. In this study, we evaluated the impact of an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule of BRAF/MEK inhibition in a melanoma model mildly sensitive to a BRAF inhibitor. The combination of a BRAFi with three different MEKi was studied with a continuous or intermittent dosing schedule in vivo, in a xenografted melanoma model and ex vivo using histoculture drug response assays (HDRAs) of patient-derived xenografts (PDX). To further understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of therapeutic efficacy, a biomarker pharmacodynamic readout was evaluated. An equal impact on tumor growth was observed in monotherapy or bitherapy regimens whether we used continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, with no significant differences in biomarkers expression between the treatments. The antitumoral effect was mostly due to modulations of expression of cell cycle and apoptotic mediators. Moreover, ex vivo studies did not show significant differences between the dosing schedules. In this context, our preclinical and pharmacodynamic results converged to show the similarity between intermittent and continuous treatments with either BRAFi or MEKi alone or with the combination of both.

摘要

BRAF和MEK抑制剂(BRAFi/MEKi)的研发推动了黑色素瘤治疗取得重大进展。然而,耐药机制的出现限制了获益时长,接受BRAFi±MEKi治疗的患者中,完全缓解的比例不到20%。在本研究中,我们在对BRAF抑制剂轻度敏感的黑色素瘤模型中,评估了BRAF/MEK抑制的间歇给药方案与连续给药方案的影响。在体内的异种移植黑色素瘤模型中,以及使用患者来源异种移植瘤(PDX)的组织培养药物反应测定(HDRA)进行体外研究时,研究了BRAFi与三种不同MEKi的联合用药,并采用连续或间歇给药方案。为了进一步了解治疗效果的潜在分子机制,评估了生物标志物药效学读数。无论是单药治疗还是联合治疗方案,无论采用连续给药方案还是间歇给药方案,对肿瘤生长的影响均相同,各治疗组之间生物标志物表达无显著差异。抗肿瘤作用主要归因于细胞周期和凋亡介质表达的调节。此外,体外研究未显示给药方案之间存在显著差异。在此背景下,我们的临床前和药效学结果一致表明,BRAFi或MEKi单独使用或两者联合使用时,间歇治疗和连续治疗具有相似性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f10/6931208/0eb846edae47/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验