Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Valiant Clinic/Houston Methodist Group, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; School of Medicine, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):913-922. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
Since the introduction of acromioplasty by Neer in 1971 and arthroscopic subacromial decompression (SAD) by Ellman in 1987, the outcomes have been reported to be consistently good. Recently it was suggested that supervised physical therapy is comparable with SAD, which was contested by other studies claiming that SAD is clearly superior to nonoperative treatment. Before consideration for treatment, the diagnosis of impingement with an intact rotator cuff must be determined by clinical history, a detailed and structured clinical examination, and appropriate imaging. In favor of SAD are published long-term studies with a minimum of 10 years outlining significant functional and clinical improvement. The main factor for failure reported was workers compensation, calcific tendinopathy, and high-grade partial-thickness tears. Studies nonsupportive of SAD suffer from bias, crossover from the nonoperative group to the operative group following failure of conservative treatment, and loss of follow-up. Recently, lateral acromion resection has been suggested as a viable alternative, effectively reducing the critical shoulder angle. Following nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks, SAD is a viable and good surgical option for the treatment of shoulder impingement with an intact rotator cuff. Care should be taken to avoid resection of the acromioclavicular ligament. Five millimeters of lateral acromion resection is the recommended amount of resection. Patients with chronic calcific tendinitis, workers compensation, and partial-thickness tears should not be treated by SAD alone.
自 Neer 于 1971 年引入肩峰成形术和 Ellman 于 1987 年引入关节镜下肩峰下减压术(SAD)以来,其疗效一直被报道为良好。最近有研究表明,监督下的物理治疗与 SAD 效果相当,但其他研究则认为 SAD 明显优于非手术治疗,对此观点提出了质疑。在考虑治疗之前,必须通过临床病史、详细和结构化的临床检查以及适当的影像学检查来确定肩峰下撞击症合并完整肩袖的诊断。支持 SAD 的是已发表的至少 10 年的长期研究,这些研究表明其具有显著的功能和临床改善。报告的主要失败因素是工人赔偿、钙化性肌腱炎和高分级部分厚度撕裂。不支持 SAD 的研究存在偏倚,在保守治疗失败后从非手术组交叉到手术组,并且存在随访丢失。最近,外侧肩峰切除术已被认为是一种可行的替代方法,可有效减小临界肩角。对于合并完整肩袖的肩峰下撞击症,在至少 6 周的非手术治疗后,SAD 是一种可行且良好的手术选择。应注意避免切除肩锁关节韧带。建议切除 5 毫米的外侧肩峰。对于慢性钙化性肌腱炎、工人赔偿和部分厚度撕裂的患者,不应单独采用 SAD 治疗。