• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师主导的干预对首次心血管药物处方患者依从性的影响:挪威药房的一项随机对照试验。

Effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on adherence among patients with a first-time prescription for a cardiovascular medicine: a randomized controlled trial in Norwegian pharmacies.

机构信息

Apokus, National Centre for Development of Pharmacy Practice, Oslo, Norway.

Norwegian Pharmacy Association, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Aug;28(4):337-345. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12598. Epub 2019 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1111/ijpp.12598
PMID:31886591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7384053/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether a pharmacist-led intervention improves medication adherence among patients who have filled a first-time prescription for a cardiovascular medicine.

METHODS

Design: Unblinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

67 Norwegian pharmacies, October 2014-June 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

1480 adults with a first-time prescription for a cardiovascular medicine.

INTERVENTION

Participants in the intervention group received two consultations with a pharmacist 1-2 and 3-5 weeks after filling the prescription. Participants in the control group received care according to usual practice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was self-reported adherence as measured by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), at 7 and 18 weeks after filling the prescription. Adherence from baseline to week 52 was estimated using data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NPD).

KEY FINDINGS

Data from MMAS-8 showed that 91.3% of the patients in the intervention group were adherent after 7 weeks versus 86.8% in the control group (4.5% difference, 95% CI 0.8-8.2, P = 0.017). The corresponding proportions were 88.7% versus 83.7% after 18 weeks (5.0% difference, 95% CI 0.8-9.2, P = 0.021). NPD data (n = 1294) showed no significant difference in adherence after 52 weeks (95% CI -2.0 to 7.8, P = 0.24). However, adherence among statin users (n = 182) was 66.5% in the intervention group versus 57.4% among new statin users in the general population (n = 1500) (difference 9.1%, 95% CI 1.5-16.0, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The main outcome measure indicates that a short, structured pharmacist-led intervention may increase medication adherence for patients starting on chronic cardiovascular medication. However, these findings could not be confirmed by the NPD data analysis.

摘要

目的

考察药剂师主导的干预措施是否能提高首次开具心血管药物处方患者的药物依从性。

方法

设计:非盲随机对照试验。

地点

2014 年 10 月至 2015 年 6 月,挪威 67 家药店。

参与者

1480 名首次开具心血管药物处方的成年人。

干预措施

干预组患者在服药后 1-2 周和 3-5 周时各接受一次与药剂师的咨询。对照组患者接受常规护理。

主要结局测量

主要结局是通过 Morisky 药物依从性量表(MMAS-8)在服药后 7 周和 18 周时自我报告的依从性。通过挪威处方数据库(NPD)的数据来估计从基线到第 52 周的依从性。

主要发现

MMAS-8 数据显示,干预组患者在第 7 周时的依从率为 91.3%,而对照组为 86.8%(差异为 4.5%,95%CI 0.8-8.2,P=0.017)。第 18 周时的相应比例分别为 88.7%和 83.7%(差异为 5.0%,95%CI 0.8-9.2,P=0.021)。NPD 数据(n=1294)显示,第 52 周时的依从性无显著差异(95%CI -2.0 至 7.8,P=0.24)。然而,在接受他汀类药物治疗的患者(n=182)中,干预组的依从率为 66.5%,而在普通人群中(n=1500)新开始使用他汀类药物的患者中为 57.4%(差异 9.1%,95%CI 1.5-16.0,P=0.019)。

结论

主要结局测量表明,短期、结构化的药剂师主导的干预措施可能会提高开始服用慢性心血管药物患者的药物依从性。然而,这些发现无法通过 NPD 数据分析得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae4/7384053/a234d8e24255/IJPP-28-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae4/7384053/a234d8e24255/IJPP-28-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae4/7384053/a234d8e24255/IJPP-28-337-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of a pharmacist-led intervention on adherence among patients with a first-time prescription for a cardiovascular medicine: a randomized controlled trial in Norwegian pharmacies.药剂师主导的干预对首次心血管药物处方患者依从性的影响:挪威药房的一项随机对照试验。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Aug;28(4):337-345. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12598. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
2
Community Pharmacists Assisting in Total Cardiovascular Health (CPATCH): A Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Trial Testing a Focused Adherence Strategy Involving Community Pharmacies.社区药剂师助力全面心血管健康(CPATCH):一项群组随机对照试验,测试一项涉及社区药房的针对性依从性策略
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1055-1064. doi: 10.1002/phar.1831. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
Impact of a community pharmacist-led medication review on medicines use in patients on polypharmacy--a prospective randomised controlled trial.社区药剂师主导的用药审查对多重用药患者药物使用的影响——一项前瞻性随机对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 23;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1384-8.
4
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led intervention to improve medication adherence in patients initiating dabigatran treatment: a comparison with standard pharmacy practice in Poland.评价药师主导的干预措施对开始接受达比加群治疗的患者用药依从性的改善作用:与波兰标准药学实践的比较。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 19;23(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01821-9.
5
Pharmacist-to-prescriber intervention to close therapeutic gaps for statin use in patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.药剂师对开处方者进行干预以缩小糖尿病患者他汀类药物治疗差距:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3S):S236-S242.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.04.009.
6
The (cost-)effectiveness of a patient-tailored intervention programme to enhance adherence to antihypertensive medication in community pharmacies: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一项针对社区药房患者定制干预方案以提高抗高血压药物依从性的(成本-)效益分析:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1696-3.
7
Medication adherence communications in community pharmacies: A naturalistic investigation.社区药房中的药物依从性沟通:一项自然主义调查。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.药师主导的教育干预对老年人不合理用药处方的影响:D-PRESCRIBE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131.
9
Association Between Pharmacy Closures and Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications Among Older US Adults.美国老年人中,药店关闭与心血管药物治疗依从性之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192606. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2606.
10
Effects of a TELephone Counselling Intervention by Pharmacist (TelCIP) on medication adherence, patient beliefs and satisfaction with information for patients starting treatment: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.药剂师电话咨询干预(TelCIP)对开始治疗的患者用药依从性、患者信念及信息满意度的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 15;14:219. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-219.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns and predictors of self-medication behavior of weight loss medications: a cross-sectional analysis of social media influence and role of pharmacist intervention.减肥药物自我用药行为的模式及预测因素:社交媒体影响与药剂师干预作用的横断面分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 14;16:1606566. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606566. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.药师主导的干预对慢性病患者药物依从性的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 22;19:2161-2178. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S530503. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting adherence for people starting a new medication for a long-term condition through community pharmacies: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the New Medicine Service.通过社区药房支持长期疾病患者开始服用新药的依从性:新药服务的实用随机对照试验
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):747-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004400. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
2
Motivational interviewing for medication adherence.用于药物依从性的动机性访谈
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jul-Aug;55(4):e354-61; quiz e362-3. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.15532.
3
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.
Development of a behavioural theory-based New Medicine Service toolkit for community pharmacists to promote medication adherence.
为社区药剂师开发基于行为理论的新型药物服务工具包,以促进药物依从性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01959-3.
4
Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善降脂药物依从性的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 26;84:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103270. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study.药师主导的干预措施对资源有限中心哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:一项干预性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 1;18:1395-1408. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S460810. eCollection 2024.
6
An evaluation of written materials for supporting hypertensive patient education and counselling when performing a new medicine service in Poland.评估在波兰开展新药服务时,用于支持高血压患者教育和咨询的书面材料。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 10;24(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05523-x.
7
Enhancing Patient Adherence to Newly-Prescribed Medicine for Chronic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and Cost-Effective Approach to Implementing the New Medicine Service in Community Pharmacies in Poland.提高慢性病患者对新处方药物的依从性:波兰社区药房实施新药服务的综合综述及成本效益方法。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 3;30:e942923. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942923.
8
A systematic review on experimental studies about patient adherence to treatment.系统综述:关于患者治疗依从性的实验研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Feb;12(1):e1166. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1166.
9
Pharmacist's interventions in factors contributing to medication errors reduces medication errors in self-management of patients in the rehabilitation ward.药剂师对导致用药错误的因素进行干预,可减少康复病房患者自我管理中的用药错误。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2022 Dec 12;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40780-022-00268-5.
10
Reimbursed medication adherence enhancing interventions in 12 european countries: Current state of the art and future challenges.12个欧洲国家中报销药物依从性增强干预措施:现状与未来挑战
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 11;13:944829. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.944829. eCollection 2022.
全球、地区和国家按年龄、性别划分的 240 种死因的全死因和特定死因死亡率,1990-2013 年:2013 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.
5
The Pennsylvania Project: pharmacist intervention improved medication adherence and reduced health care costs.宾夕法尼亚项目:药剂师干预提高了药物依从性并降低了医疗保健成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Aug;33(8):1444-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1398.
6
Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework.理解患者对长期疾病所开药物的依从性相关信念:必要性-担忧框架的荟萃分析综述
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e80633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080633. eCollection 2013.
7
Protocol for the New Medicine Service Study: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation with qualitative appraisal comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the New Medicine Service in community pharmacies in England.新药服务研究方案:一项随机对照试验和经济评价,结合定性评估,比较英国社区药店中新药服务的有效性和成本效益。
Trials. 2013 Dec 1;14:411. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-411.
8
Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients.预防心血管疾病药物的依从性:对 376,162 名患者的荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2012 Sep;125(9):882-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
9
Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors.改善自我报告的药物治疗不依从性的测量:对作者的回应
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
10
New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension.老年高血压患者的新型药物依从性量表与药房配药率对比
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):59-66.