Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56688-1.
Invasive Salmonella diseases, both typhoid and invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS), are seasonal bloodstream infections causing important morbidity and mortality globally in Africa. The reservoirs and transmission of both are not fully understood. We hypothesised that differences in the time-lagged relationships of rainfall or temperature with typhoid and iNTS incidence might infer differences in epidemiology. We assessed the dynamics of invasive Salmonella incidence over a 16-year period of surveillance, quantifying incidence peaks, seasonal variations, and nonlinear effects of rainfall and temperature exposures on the relative risks of typhoid and iNTS, using monthly lags. An increased relative risk of iNTS incidence was short-lasting but immediate after the onset of the rains, whereas that of typhoid was long-lasting but with a two months delayed start, implying a possible difference in transmission. The relative-risk function of temperature for typhoid was bimodal, with higher risk at both lower (with a 1 month lag) and higher (with a ≥4 months lag) temperatures, possibly reflecting the known patterns of short and long cycle typhoid transmission. In contrast, the relative-risk of iNTS was only increased at lower temperatures, suggesting distinct transmission mechanisms. Environmental and sanitation control strategies may be different for iNTS compared to typhoid disease.
侵袭性沙门氏菌病,包括伤寒和侵袭性非伤寒沙门氏菌(iNTS),是季节性血液感染病,在全球范围内导致了重要的发病率和死亡率,尤其在非洲。目前尚未完全了解这些疾病的传染源和传播途径。我们假设,降雨或温度与伤寒和 iNTS 发病率之间的时间滞后关系的差异可能暗示着流行病学方面的差异。我们评估了在 16 年的监测期间侵袭性沙门氏菌发病率的动态变化,通过每月的滞后,量化了发病率峰值、季节性变化以及降雨和温度暴露对伤寒和 iNTS 的相对风险的非线性影响。iNTS 发病率的相对风险增加是短暂但立即的,而伤寒的相对风险增加则是持久的,但开始时间延迟了两个月,这表明传播方式可能存在差异。伤寒的温度相对风险函数呈双峰型,较低温度(滞后 1 个月)和较高温度(滞后≥4 个月)的风险更高,这可能反映了已知的短周期和长周期伤寒传播模式。相比之下,iNTS 的相对风险仅在较低温度下增加,这表明存在不同的传播机制。环境和卫生控制策略可能因 iNTS 与伤寒疾病而有所不同。