• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子治疗态度与流程量表(eTAP)的开发:一种用于心理健康电子干预中态度和流程的简短测量工具。

Development of the eTAP: A brief measure of attitudes and process in e-interventions for mental health.

作者信息

Clough Bonnie A, Eigeland Jessica A, Madden Imogen R, Rowland Dale, Casey Leanne M

机构信息

School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2019 Jun 18;18:100256. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100256. eCollection 2019 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2019.100256
PMID:31890610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6926169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considerable evidence supports the efficacy of e-interventions for mental health treatment and support. However, client engagement and adherence to these interventions are less than optimal and remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to develop and investigate the psychometric properties of the e-Therapy Attitudes and Process questionnaire (eTAP). Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), the eTAP was designed to measure factors related to client engagement in e-interventions for mental health.

METHODS

Participants were 220 adults who reported current use of an e-intervention for mental health support. Participants completed the eTAP and related measures, with a subsample of 49 participants completing a one-week follow up assessment.

RESULTS

A 16-item version of the eTAP produced a clear four-factor structure, explaining 70.25% of variance. The factors were consistent with the TPB, namely, Intention, Subjective Norm, Attitudes, and Perceived Behavioural Control. Internal consistency of the total and subscales was high, and adequate to good one-week test retest reliability was found. Convergent and divergent validity of the total and subscales was supported, as was the predictive validity. Specifically, eTAP Intentions correctly predicted engagement in e-interventions with 84% accuracy and non-engagement with 74% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The eTAP was developed as a measure of factors related to engagement and adherence with e-interventions for mental health. Psychometric investigation supported the validity and reliability of the eTAP. The eTAP may be a valuable tool to understand, predict, and guide interventions to increase engagement and adherence to e-interventions for mental health.

摘要

背景

大量证据支持电子干预在心理健康治疗和支持方面的有效性。然而,客户对这些干预措施的参与度和依从性并不理想,且仍未得到充分理解。

目的

本研究的目的是开发并调查电子治疗态度与过程问卷(eTAP)的心理测量特性。基于计划行为理论(TPB),eTAP旨在测量与客户参与心理健康电子干预相关的因素。

方法

参与者为220名报告当前正在使用电子干预措施以获得心理健康支持的成年人。参与者完成了eTAP及相关测量,其中49名参与者的子样本完成了为期一周的随访评估。

结果

16项版本的eTAP产生了清晰的四因素结构,解释了70.25%的方差。这些因素与TPB一致,即意图、主观规范、态度和感知行为控制。总量表和子量表的内部一致性较高,且发现了足够好的一周重测信度。总量表和子量表的收敛效度和区分效度均得到支持,预测效度也是如此。具体而言,eTAP意图以84%的准确率正确预测了对电子干预的参与情况,以74%的准确率正确预测了未参与情况。

结论

开发eTAP是为了测量与参与和坚持心理健康电子干预相关的因素。心理测量学调查支持了eTAP的效度和信度。eTAP可能是一种有价值的工具,可用于理解、预测和指导干预措施,以提高对心理健康电子干预的参与度和依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/6926169/cb286e2ac392/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/6926169/2ea47ef3c309/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/6926169/cb286e2ac392/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/6926169/2ea47ef3c309/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c8/6926169/cb286e2ac392/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the eTAP: A brief measure of attitudes and process in e-interventions for mental health.电子治疗态度与流程量表(eTAP)的开发:一种用于心理健康电子干预中态度和流程的简短测量工具。
Internet Interv. 2019 Jun 18;18:100256. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100256. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Development of the eTAP-T: A measure of mental health professionals' attitudes and process towards e-interventions.eTAP-T的开发:一项衡量心理健康专业人员对电子干预措施的态度及过程的指标。
Internet Interv. 2019 Oct 21;18:100288. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100288. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Understanding client engagement in digital mental health interventions: An investigation of the eTherapy Attitudes and Process Questionnaire.理解客户对数字心理健康干预的参与度:电子治疗态度和过程问卷的调查。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;78(9):1785-1805. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23342. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the TWente Engagement with Ehealth Technologies Scale (TWEETS): Evaluation Study.TWente 健康技术参与量表(TWEETS)的心理计量学评估:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e17757. doi: 10.2196/17757.
5
The Therapy Attitudes and Process Questionnaire: A Brief Measure of Factors Related to Psychotherapy Appointment Attendance.《治疗态度与过程问卷:与心理治疗预约出勤率相关因素的简短测量工具》
Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):237-250. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0199-3.
6
Mental Help Seeking Attitudes Scale (MHSAS): Development, reliability, validity, and comparison with the ATSPPH-SF and IASMHS-PO.心理求助态度量表(MHSAS):编制、信度、效度,以及与 ATSPPH-SF 和 IASMHS-PO 的比较。
J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jan;65(1):74-85. doi: 10.1037/cou0000248.
7
Explaining adults' mental health help-seeking through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: a scoping review.从计划行为理论视角阐释成年人心理健康求助:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;11(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02034-y.
8
Development and validation of a generic questionnaire for the implementation of complex medical interventions.用于实施复杂医疗干预措施的通用问卷的开发与验证
Ger Med Sci. 2014 Apr 1;12:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/000193. eCollection 2014.
9
Predicting healthy eating intention and adherence to dietary recommendations during pregnancy in Australia using the Theory of Planned Behaviour.采用计划行为理论预测澳大利亚孕妇的健康饮食意愿和对饮食建议的依从性。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 20.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Topic-Based Chatbots on Mental Health Self-Care and Mental Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于主题的聊天机器人对心理健康自我护理和心理健康的有效性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e70436. doi: 10.2196/70436.
2
An internet-based self-help intervention for the reduction of consumption of ultra-processed products and increase of physical activity in Mexican university population: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项基于互联网的自助干预措施,旨在减少墨西哥大学生群体中超加工食品的摄入量并增加身体活动量:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 29;11:1325528. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1325528. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Type I and Type II Error Rates and Overall Accuracy of the Revised Parallel Analysis Method for Determining the Number of Factors.用于确定因子数量的修订平行分析方法的I型和II型错误率及总体准确性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):428-457. doi: 10.1177/0013164414546566. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
2
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
What do help-seeking measures assess? Building a conceptualization framework for help-seeking intentions through a systematic review of measure content.
Investigating non-inferiority of internet-delivered versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I): a randomised controlled trial (iSleep well).
互联网传递式与面对面认知行为疗法治疗失眠症(CBT-I)的非劣效性研究:一项随机对照试验(iSleep well)。
Trials. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08214-6.
4
Navigating Social Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Protocol for a Pilot Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Study for Remote Avatar-Assisted Cognitive Remediation Therapy.应对精神分裂症谱系障碍中的社会认知障碍:一项针对远程化身辅助认知康复治疗的前后准实验性试点研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 13;13:e54251. doi: 10.2196/54251.
5
A Decade in Review: A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Interventions for Emotional Disorders.十年回顾:对虚拟现实干预情绪障碍的系统评价
Psychosoc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):1-20. doi: 10.5093/pi2021a8. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Validation of the Attitudes Towards Psychological Online Interventions Questionnaire Among Black Americans: Cross-cultural Confirmatory Factor Analysis.美国黑人对在线心理干预问卷态度的验证:跨文化验证性因素分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Apr 27;10:e43929. doi: 10.2196/43929.
7
Will they or won't they? Understanding New Zealand adults' attitudes towards using digital interventions.他们会还是不会?了解新西兰成年人对使用数字干预措施的态度。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 8;5:1008564. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1008564. eCollection 2023.
8
Understanding client engagement in digital mental health interventions: An investigation of the eTherapy Attitudes and Process Questionnaire.理解客户对数字心理健康干预的参与度:电子治疗态度和过程问卷的调查。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;78(9):1785-1805. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23342. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Remote group therapies for cognitive health in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: Feasible, acceptable, engaging.精神分裂症谱系障碍认知健康的远程团体治疗:可行、可接受、有吸引力。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Dec 6;28:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Attentional Features of Mindfulness are Better Predictors of Face Recognition than Empathy and Compassion-Based Constructs.正念的注意特征比基于同理心和同情心的构念更好地预测人脸识别。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1481-1515. doi: 10.1177/00332941211061698. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
求助措施评估什么?通过对测量内容的系统回顾,构建求助意向的概念化框架。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Going global: do consumer preferences, attitudes, and barriers to using e-mental health services differ across countries?走向全球:消费者对使用电子心理健康服务的偏好、态度和障碍是否因国家而异?
J Ment Health. 2019 Feb;28(1):17-25. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370639. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Current Views and Perspectives on E-Mental Health: An Exploratory Survey Study for Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Psychotherapy in Germany.关于电子心理健康的当前观点与展望:一项探索性调查研究,旨在了解德国公众对基于互联网的心理治疗的态度
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Feb 23;4(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/mental.6375.
6
The Therapy Attitudes and Process Questionnaire: A Brief Measure of Factors Related to Psychotherapy Appointment Attendance.《治疗态度与过程问卷:与心理治疗预约出勤率相关因素的简短测量工具》
Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):237-250. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0199-3.
7
The Use of Smartphones for Health Research.智能手机在健康研究中的应用。
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):157-160. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001205.
8
A Systematic Review of Predictors of, and Reasons for, Adherence to Online Psychological Interventions.在线心理干预依从性的预测因素及原因的系统评价
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;23(6):776-794. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9.
9
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
10
Establishing and Governing e-Mental Health Care in Australia: A Systematic Review of Challenges and A Call For Policy-Focussed Research.澳大利亚电子心理健康护理的建立与管理:挑战的系统综述及对聚焦政策研究的呼吁
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 13;18(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4827.