Wang Lei, Fang Hong, Xia Qinghua, Liu Xiaona, Chen Yingyao, Zhou Peng, Yan Yujie, Yao Baodong, Wei Yan, Jiang Yu, Rothman Russell L, Xu Wanghong
School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.
Minhang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 962 Zhong Yi Road, Shanghai, China.
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Nov 19;17:100211. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.004. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The diabetes patients in China have low health literacy and low levels of physical activities which may result in the poor glycemic control and other clinical outcomes. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of health literacy and exercise-focused interventions on clinical outcomes among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
In this cluster randomized controlled trial, 799 T2DM patients with the most recent A1c ≥ 7·5% (58 mmol/mol, or fasting glucose level ≥10 mmol/L) were recruited from 35 clinics in 8 communities in Shanghai, China, and randomized into one standard care (control) arm and three intervention arms receiving interventions focused on health literacy, exercise or both. A1c (primary outcome), blood pressure and lipids (secondary outcomes) were measured at baseline, 3-, 6-, 12-months of intervention period and 12-months after completion of the interventions. This trial is registered with the International Standard RCT Number Register, number ISRCTN76130594.
The three intervention groups had more reductions in A1c than the control group, with 0·90% reduction in the health literacy, 0·83% in the exercise and 0·54% in the comprehensive group at 12-months (<0·001) and these improvements remained even after a 1-year follow-up period post intervention. The risk of suboptimal A1c (≥7·0% or 53 mmol/mol) was also significantly lower in three intervention groups than control group at each follow-up visit, with adjusted risk ratios (RR) ranging from 0.06 to 0.16. However, the control group has greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) than the health literacy group from baseline to 12-months (β=0·55, <0·0001) and from baseline to 24-months (β=0·62, <0·0001). A higher risk of abnormal LDL was also observed for the health literacy group at 12-months [adjusted risk ratio (RR): 2·22, 95%CI: 1·11-4·44] and 24-months [adjusted risk ratio (RR): 2·37, 95%CI: 1·16-4·87] compared to the control group. No significant benefits in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and low-density lipoprotein (HDL) were observed from the interventions compared to the usual care.
The health literacy and exercise interventions result in significant improvements in A1c. However, no significant benefits in blood pressure and lipids control were observed. These effective interventions may have potential of scaling up in China and other countries to help diabetes patients manage their blood glucose levels.
This Study was supported by the China Medical Board (CMB) Open Competition Project (No.13-159) and the Social Science Fund of China National Ministry of Education (No.14YJAZH092).
中国糖尿病患者的健康素养较低,身体活动水平也较低,这可能导致血糖控制不佳及其他临床后果。本研究旨在评估以健康素养和运动为重点的干预措施对中国2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者临床结局的有效性。
在这项整群随机对照试验中,从中国上海8个社区的35家诊所招募了799例糖化血红蛋白(A1c)≥7.5%(58 mmol/mol)或空腹血糖水平≥10 mmol/L的T2DM患者,并随机分为一个标准护理(对照)组和三个干预组,分别接受以健康素养、运动或两者为重点的干预措施。在基线、干预期的3个月、6个月、12个月以及干预结束后12个月测量A1c(主要结局)、血压和血脂(次要结局)。本试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库注册,编号为ISRCTN76130594。
三个干预组的A1c降低幅度均大于对照组,在12个月时,健康素养组降低了0.90%,运动组降低了0.83%,综合组降低了0.54%(P<0.001),且这些改善在干预后1年的随访期内仍然存在。在每次随访时,三个干预组糖化血红蛋白控制不佳(≥7.0%或53 mmol/mol)的风险也显著低于对照组,调整后的风险比(RR)在0.06至0.16之间。然而,从基线到12个月(β=0.55,P<0.0001)以及从基线到24个月(β=0.62,P<0.0001),对照组的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)降低幅度大于健康素养组。与对照组相比,健康素养组在12个月[调整后风险比(RR):2.22,95%置信区间(CI):1.11 - 4.44]和24个月[调整后风险比(RR):2.37,95%CI:1.16 - 4.87]时出现低密度脂蛋白异常的风险更高。与常规护理相比,干预措施在收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)方面未观察到显著益处。
健康素养和运动干预可显著改善A1c。然而,在血压和血脂控制方面未观察到显著益处。这些有效的干预措施可能有在中国及其他国家扩大规模以帮助糖尿病患者控制血糖水平的潜力。
本研究由美国中华医学基金会(CMB)开放竞争项目(编号13 - 159)和中国国家教育部社会科学基金(编号14YJAZH092)资助。